SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abdala-Roberts, L. & Marquis, R.J. 2007. Test of local adaptation to biotic interactions and soil abiotic conditions in the ant-tended Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Oecologia 154: 315326.
  • Abdala-Roberts, L., Parra-Tabla, V., Salinas-Peba, L. & Herrera, C.M. 2009a. Noncorrelated effects of seed predation and pollination on the perennial herb Ruellia nudiflora remain spatially consistent. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 800807.
  • Abdala-Roberts, L., Parra-Tabla, V., Salinas-Peba, L., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Delfín-González, H. 2009b. Spatial variation in the strength of a trophic cascade involving Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae), an insect seed predator and its associated parasitoid fauna. Biotropica. in press.
  • Alpert, P. & Simms, E.L. 2002. The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol. Ecol. 16: 285297.
  • Amarillo-Suarez, A. & Fox, C. 2006. Population differences in host use by a seed-beetle: local adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects. Oecologia 150: 247258.
  • Antonovics, J. & Bradshaw, A.D. 1970. Evolution of closely related adjacent plant populations. VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25: 349362.
  • Arellano-Rodríguez, A., Flores, S., Tun, J. & Cruz, M. 2003. Nomenclatura, forma de vida, uso, manejo y distribución de las especies vegetales de la Península de Yucatán. Etnoflora Yucatanense. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Yucatán.
  • Barrett, S.H.C. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 9911004.
  • Bazzaz, F.A. 1996. Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Becker, U., Colling, G., Dostal, P., Jakobsson, A. & Matthies, D. 2006. Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 150: 506518.
  • Berenbaum, M.R. & Zangerl, A.R. 1998. Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95: 1374313748.
  • Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. 1994. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Biere, A. & Verhoeven, K.J.F. 2008. Local adaptation and the consequences of being dislocated from coevolved enemies. New Phytol. 180: 265268.
  • Bradshaw, A.D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13: 115155.
  • Chávez, M. 1995. Dzibichaltún Parque Nacional: Flora y Fauna. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad, Yucatán.
  • Chico-Ponce de León, P.A. 1999. Atlas de procesos territoriales de Yucatán. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Yucatán.
  • Coley, P.D. & Barone, J.A. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 305335.
  • Crawley, M. 1997. Plant–herbivore dynamics. In: Plant Ecology (M.Crawley, ed.), pp. 401474. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Crémieux, L., Bischoff, A., Šmilauerová, M., Lawson, C.S., Mortimer, S.R., Doležal, J., Lanta, V., Edwards, A.R., Brook, A.J., Tscheulin, T., Macel, M., Lepš, J., Müller-Schärer, H. & Steinger, T. 2008. Potential contribution of natural enemies to patterns of local adaptation in plants. New Phytol. 180: 524533.
  • Dechamps, C., Noret, N., Mozek, R., Escarré, J., Lefebvre, C., Gruber, W. & Meerts, P. 2008. Cost of adaptation to a metalliferous environment for Thlaspi caerulescens: a field reciprocal transplantation approach. New Phytol. 177: 167177.
  • DeVries, P.J. 1987. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  • Diniz, I.R. & Morais, H.C. 2002. Local patterns of host plant utilization by lepidopteran larvae in the cerrado vegetation. Entomotropica 17: 115119.
  • Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586608.
  • Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Monographs in Population Biology 21. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  • Gómez, J.M. & Zamora, R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormatophylla spinosa (Cruciferaceae). Am. Nat. 155: 589668.
  • Greischar, M.A. & Koskella, B. 2007. A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 10: 418434.
  • Hanks, L. & Denno, R. 1994. Local adaptation in the armored scale insect Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Ecology 75: 23012310.
  • Hereford, J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Nat. 173: 579588.
  • Herrera, C.M., Medrano, M., Rey, P., Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M., García, M., Guitián, J. & Manzaneda, A. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 1682316828.
  • Janzen, D.H. 1980. When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611612.
  • Kawecki, T. & Ebert, D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 12251241.
  • Keane, R.M. & Crawley, M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164170.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Pfenning, D.W. & Servedio, M.R. 2002. Migration, local adaptation and the evolution of plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 540541.
  • Kolb, A., Ehrlén, J. & Eriksson, O. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 9: 79100.
  • Lederhouse, R., Codella, S., Grossmueller, D. & Maccarone, A. 1992. Host plant-based territoriality in the white peacock butterfly, Anartia jatrophae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 7217218.
  • Leger, E.A. & Rice, K.J. 2007. Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica). J. Evol. Biol. 20: 10901103.
  • Leimu, R. & Lehtilä, K. 2006. Effects of two types of herbivores on the population dynamics of a perennial herb. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7: 224235.
  • Linhart, Y. & Grant, M. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237277.
  • Littell, R., Milliken, G., Stroup, W. & Wolfinger, R. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, North Carolina.
  • Lortie, C.J. & Aarssen, L.W. 1996. The specialization hypothesis for phenotypic plasticity in plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 484487.
  • Marquis, R. 1992. The selective impact of herbivores. In: Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution and Genetics (R.Fritz & E.Simms, eds), pp. 301325. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Mopper, S. & Strauss, S. 1998. Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations: Effects of Ecology, Life History, and Behavior. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Mopper, S., Beck, M., Simberloff, D. & Stiling, P. 1995. Local adaptation and agents of selection in a mobile insect. Evolution 49: 810815.
  • Novotny, V. & Basset, Y. 2005. Host specificity on insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 10831090.
  • Nuismer, S. & Gandon, S. 2008. Moving beyond common-garden and transplant designs: insight into the causes of local adaptation in species interactions. Am. Nat. 171: 658668.
  • Núñez-Farfán, J., Fornoni, J. & Valverde, P.L. 2007. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 541566.
  • Rey, P.J., Herrera, C.M., Guitián, J., Cerdá, X., Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M., Medrano, M. & Garrido, J.L. 2006. The geographic mosaic in predispersal interactions and selection on Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 19: 2134.
  • Ruhnke, H., Schädler, M., Matthies, D., Klotz, S. & Brandl, R. 2006. Are sawflies adapted to individual host tress? A test of the adaptive deme formation hypothesis Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 10391048.
  • Santamaría, L., Figuerola, J., Pilon, J.J., Mjelde, M., Green, A.J., De Boer, T., King, R.A. & Gornall, R.J. 2003. Plant performance across latitude: the role of plasticity and local adaptation in an aquatic plant. Ecology 84: 24542461.
  • SAS 2002. SAS, Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., North Carolina.
  • Schemske, D.W. 1984. Population structure and local selection in Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. Evolution 38: 817832.
  • Schmid, B. 1994. Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands of Solidago altissima- evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations. J. Ecol. 82: 165175.
  • Schwaegerle, K.E. & Bazzaz, F.A. 1987. Differentiation among nine populations of Phlox: response to environmental gradients. Ecology 68: 5464.
  • Sork, V., Stowe, K. & Hochwender, C. 1993. Evidence for local adaptation in closely adjacent subpopulations of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) expressed as resistance to leaf herbivores. Am. Nat. 142: 928936.
  • Standley, P., Williams, L. & Gibson, D. 1974. Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana Bot. 24: 328462.
  • Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Sultan, S.E. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 363383.
  • Sultan, S.E. & Spencer, H.G. 2002. Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am. Nat. 160: 271283.
  • Thompson, J.N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Thompson, J.N. 2002. Plant animal interactions: Future directions. In: Plant-Animal Interactions. An Evolutionary Approach (C.M.Herrera & O.Pellmyr, eds), pp. 236247. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Tripp, E. 2007. Evolutionary relationships within the species-rich genus Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Syst. Bot. 32: 628649.
  • Van Tienderen, P.H. 1992. Variation in a population of Plantago lanceolata along a topographical gradient. Oikos 64: 560572.