SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D.C. 2008. Phylogenetic meta-analysis. Evolution 62: 567572.
  • Becker, B.J. 2005. Fail safe n or file-drawer number. In: Publication Bias in Meta-analysis : Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (H.Rothstein, A.J.Sutton & M.Borenstein, eds.), pp. 111125. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Bergmann, C. 1847. Über die verhältnisse der wärmeökonomie der thiere zu ihrer grosse. Göttinger Studien 1: 595708.
  • Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K.E., MacPhee, R.D.E., Beck, R.M.D., Grenyer, R., Price, S.A., Vos, R.A., Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446: 507512.
  • Bunch, D.S. 1991. Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transport. Res. B-Meth. 25: 112.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Harvey, P.H. 1977. Primate ecology and social-organization. J. Zool. 183: 139.
  • Congdon, P. 2003. Applied Bayesian Modelling. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Congdon, P. 2005. Bayesian Models for Categorical Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  • Daganzo, C. 1979. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting. Academic Press, New York.
  • Davis, T.A. 2006. Direct Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. Fundamentals of Algorithms. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. & Rubin, D.B. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 39: 138.
  • Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., De Sant'ana, C.E.R. & Bini, L.M. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52: 12471262.
  • Duval, S. 2005. The trim and fill method. In: Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (H.Rothstein, A.J.Sutton & M.Borenstein, eds.), pp. 127144. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Duval, S. & Tweedie, R. 2000a. A nonparametric ‘‘trim and fill’’ method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95: 8998.
  • Duval, S. & Tweedie, R. 2000b. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56: 455463.
  • Falconer, D. 1983. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group, Harlow, UK.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 115.
  • Felsenstein, J. 2005. Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 14271434.
  • Felsenstein, J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171: 713725.
  • Fisher, D.O., Blomberg, S.P. & Owens, I.P.F. 2003. Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270: 18011808.
  • Foulley, J.L., Gianola, D. & Thompson, R. 1983. Prediction of genetic merit from data on binary and quantitative variates with an application to calving difficulty, birth-weight and pelvic opening. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15: 401423.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712726.
  • Garcia-Cortes, L.A. & Sorensen, D. 2001. Alternative implementations of Monte Carlo EM algorithms for likelihood inferences. Genet. Sel. Evol. 33: 443452.
  • Garland, T. & Ives, A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155: 346364.
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S. & Rubin, D.B. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis. Texts in Statistical Science.Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, 2nd edn.
  • Geman, S. & Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEET. Pattern Anal. 6: 721741.
  • Gianola, D. & Foulley, J.L. 1983. Sire evaluation for ordered categorical-data with a threshold-model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15: 201223.
  • Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R. 2002. ASReml User Guide Release 1.0 [www document]. URL http://www.VSN-Intl.com.
  • Hadfield, J.D. 2008. Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 275: 723734.
  • Hadfield, J. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software (in press).
  • Hansen, T.F. & Martins, E.P. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50: 14041417.
  • Hastings, W.K. 1970. Monte-Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97109.
  • Hedeker, D. 2003. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model. Stat. Med. 22: 14331446.
  • Henderson, C.R. 1976. Simple method for computing inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 6983.
  • Higgins, J.P.T., Thompson, S.G. & Spiegelhalter, D.J. 2009. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A-Stat. Soc. 172: 137159.
  • Housworth, E.A., Martins, E.P. & Lynch, M. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. Am. Nat. 163: 8496.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J.P. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52: 131158.
  • Im, S., Fernando, R.L. & Gianola, D. 1989. Likelihood inferences in animal breeding under selection – a missing-data theory view point. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21: 399414.
  • Ives, A.R. & Zhu, J. 2006. Statistics for correlated data: phylogenies, space, and time. Ecol. Appl. 16: 2032.
  • Ives, A.R., Midford, P.E. & Garland, T. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 56: 252270.
  • Jennions, M.D. & Moller, A.P. 2002. Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 4348.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Gomulkiewicz, R. & Carter, P.A. 2001. Variation, selection and evolution of function-valued traits. Genetica 112: 87104.
  • Korsgaard, I.R., Lund, M.S., Sorensen, D., Gianola, D., Madsen, P. & Jensen, J. 2003. Multivariate Bayesian analysis of Gaussian, right censored Gaussian, ordered categorical and binary traits using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35: 159183.
  • Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S. & Staudte, R.B. 2008. Meta Analysis: A Guide to Calibrating and Combining Statistical Evidence. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Lapointe, F.J. & Garland, T. 2001. A generalized permutation model for the analysis of cross-species data. J. Classif. 18: 109127.
  • Little, R.J.A. & Rubin, D.B. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd edn.
  • Lush, J.L. & Shrode, R.R. 1950. Changes in milk production with age and milking frequency. J. Dairy Sci. 33: 338357.
  • Lynch, M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45: 10651080.
  • Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Macaskill, P., Walter, S.D. & Irwig, L. 2001. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 20: 641654.
  • Martins, E.P. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression, and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50: 17501765.
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646667.
  • Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H. & Teller, E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21: 10871092.
  • Meuwissen, T.H.E. & Luo, Z. 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 24: 305313.
  • Moller, A.P. & Jennions, M.D. 2001. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 580586.
  • Nakagawa, S. & Freckleton, R.P. 2008. Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 592596.
  • Naya, H., Gianola, D., Romero, H., Urioste, J.I. & Musto, H. 2006. Inferring parameters shaping amino acid usage in prokaryotic genomes via Bayesian MCMC methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 203211.
  • O'Hara, R.B., Cano, J.M., Ovaskainen, O., Teplitsky, C. & Alho, J.S. 2008. Bayesian approaches in evolutionary quantitative genetics. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 949957.
  • Orwin, R.G. 1983. A fail-safe n for effect size n meta-analysis. J. Educ. Stat. 8: 157159.
  • Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies – a general-method for the comparative-analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 255: 3745.
  • Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167: 808825.
  • Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Barker, D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53: 673684.
  • Paradis, E. 2006. Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Patterson, H.D. & Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545554.
  • Quaas, R.L. 1976. Computing diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 32: 949953.
  • Rao, J.N.K. & Wu, C.F.J. 1988. Resampling inference with complex survey data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83: 231241.
  • Revell, L.J., Harmon, L.J. & Collar, D.C. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57: 591601.
  • Roberts, G.O. & Sahu, S.K. 1997. Updating schemes, correlation structure, blocking and parameterization for the Gibbs sampler. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 59: 291317.
  • Rosenberg, M.S. 2005. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59: 464468.
  • Rosenthal, R. 1979. The ‘‘file drawer problem’’ and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 86: 638641.
  • Rothstein, H., Sutton, A.J. & Borenstein, M. (eds.), 2005. Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Rubin, D.B. 1976. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63: 581590.
  • Shao, J. & Tu, S. 1996. The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
  • Smith, D., Givens, G.H. & Tweedie, R. 2000. Adjusting for publication and quality bias in Bayesian meta-analysis. In: Meta-analysis in Medicine and Health Policy (D.Stangl & D.Berry, eds.), pp. 277304. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • Sorensen, D. & Gianola, D. 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Sorensen, D.A., Andersen, S., Gianola, D. & Korsgaard, I. 1995. Bayesian-inference in threshold models using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27: 229249.
  • Sterne, J.A.C. & Egger, M. 2005. Regression method to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In: Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (H.Rothstein, A.J.Sutton & M.Borenstein, eds), pp. 99125. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Sterne, J.A.C., Becker, B.J. & Egger, M. 2005. The funnel plot. In: Publication Bias in Meta-analysis : Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (H.Rothstein, A.J.Sutton & M.Borenstein, eds), pp. 7598. John Wiley, Chichester.
  • Tanner, M.A. & Wong, W.H. 1987. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82: 528540.
  • Thompson, R. 2008. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 275: 679686.
  • Thompson, R., Brotherstone, S. & White, I.M.S. 2005. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 14691477.
  • West, S.A. & Sheldon, B.C. 2002. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295: 16851688.
  • Wright, S. 1934a. An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19: 05060536.
  • Wright, S. 1934b. The results of crosses between inbred strains of guinea pigs, differing in number of digits. Genetics 19: 05370551.