SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • ageing;
  • great tit;
  • Lansing effect;
  • life-history;
  • Parus major;
  • senescence

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Ageing, long thought to be too infrequent to study effectively in natural populations, has recently been shown to be ubiquitous, even in the wild. A major challenge now is to explain variation in the rates of ageing within populations. Here, using 49 years of data from a population of great tits (Parus major), we show that offspring life-history trajectories vary with maternal age. Offspring hatched from older mothers perform better early in life, but suffer from an earlier onset, and stronger rate, of reproductive senescence later in life. Offspring reproductive lifespan is, however, unaffected by maternal age, and the different life-history trajectories result in a similar fitness payoff, measured as lifetime reproductive success. This study therefore identifies maternal age as a new factor underlying variation in rates of ageing, and, given the delayed trans-generational nature of this effect, poses the question as to proximate mechanisms linking age-effects across generations.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Senescence, a late-life reduction in reproductive performance and/or survival probability, is thought to have evolved because unavoidable extrinsic mortality weakens the force of natural selection with age (Fisher, 1930; Medawar, 1952; Williams, 1957; Hamilton, 1966). This so-called ‘selective shadow’ led to a long-held belief that senescence would seldom be observable in natural populations (Hayflick, 2000; Kirkwood & Austad, 2000), yet longitudinal studies of various vertebrate populations have recently provided compelling evidence for its ubiquity (Jones et al., 2008; Nussey et al., 2008). Age-specific deterioration has been found both for survival (Loison et al., 1999; Descamps et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2008; Keller et al., 2008) and for various reproductive traits, including measures close to fitness, such as the number of offspring that survive to breed (Brommer et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2007; Descamps et al., 2008; Bouwhuis et al., 2009).

Whereas declines in average performance with age within individuals are now well established, relatively little is known about whether rates of deterioration vary between individuals and, if so, which factors and mechanisms underlie these differences. First lines of evidence suggest that accelerated senescence may be associated with conditions early in life, specifically harsh environmental conditions [in red deer Cervus elaphus (Nussey et al., 2007) and common guillemots Uria aalge (Reed et al., 2008)] or high levels of reproductive effort [in red deer (Nussey et al., 2006) and red squirrels Tamiasciusus hudsonicus (Descamps et al., 2008)]. As yet unconsidered for natural populations, but the focus of an extensive body of work on laboratory model systems, is the possibility of maternal age at conception having long-term effects on offspring life histories (Mousseau & Fox, 1998a). These laboratory studies have not addressed the rates of ageing as such, yet some have focused on offspring lifespan, and found that offspring born from older mothers suffer from a reduced lifespan (Priest et al., 2002; Tarin et al., 2005). This pattern is referred to as the Lansing effect, after early work on rotifers Rotifer vulgaris by Albert Lansing (Lansing, 1947). Fitness consequences of a Lansing effect will depend on whether the reduction in offspring lifespan includes a reduction in reproductive lifespan, an issue which has received surprisingly little attention.

We examined trans-generational maternal age-effects by testing for a relationship between maternal age and offspring age-specific reproduction and reproductive lifespan. We used a large data set spanning 49 years of monitored breeding in a passerine bird, the great tit Parus major, for which we have previously shown reproduction to be age-specific, and senescence to occur (Bouwhuis et al., 2009). Our analyses reveal maternal age to be associated with offspring age-specific reproduction, but not reproductive lifespan, and as such identify a new factor underlying variation in rates of ageing in wild populations.

Material and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Study population and data collection

The great tit is a small passerine bird, which has been studied at the c. 380 ha mixed deciduous woodland of Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK, since 1947. From 1960 to 2008, 1020 nest boxes have been available for breeding, of which on average 217 were used by great tits each year. Nest boxes are checked every breeding season to obtain records of laying date, clutch size (i.e. number of eggs laid), brood size (i.e. number of chicks hatched, calculated as the difference between clutch size and the number of eggs left in the nest) and number of fledglings. Chicks are ringed with individually numbered metal rings 15 days post-hatching. Breeding birds are trapped at the nest whilst feeding their chicks, and identified by their ring number, or ringed if they are newly immigrated birds. Parental age is based on year of birth for locally hatched birds, or plumage characteristics (Svensson, 1994) at first catching for immigrants. Although immigration rates are high (47%, McCleery et al., 2004), most immigrants enter the population as yearlings, such that exact age is known for 91% of birds. Birds first caught with adult plumage are assigned a minimal age of 2. Birds that are not found breeding for two consecutive years are assumed to have died, and their age at last reproduction (ALR) is taken as an estimate of their reproductive lifespan (also see Bouwhuis et al., 2009).

Data selection

Previous analyses of age-specific reproduction in our population (Bouwhuis et al., 2009) focused on first broods by females of known reproductive lifespan only, because (1) Wytham great tits very rarely produce a second brood (McCleery & Perrins, 1989), (2) data on male reproductive performance are less complete and confounded by extrapair paternity and (3) reproductive lifespan (i.e. ALR) is an important factor to include in models aiming to estimate within-individual patterns of a dependent variable with age (van de Pol & Verhulst, 2006). In addition, breeding attempts which were subject to experimental manipulation were included for assessment of ALR, but excluded from analyses of reproductive performance, whilst assuming no carry-over effects to the next breeding season (Doligez et al., 2002). Here, we used the same data selection criteria, but for analyses of offspring age-specific reproduction, we furthermore selected only breeding attempts by females hatched from known-aged mothers. This resulted in a data set of 3722 breeding attempts by 2482 female offspring hatched from 1725 known-aged mothers.

Statistical analyses

Offspring age-specific reproduction

Models testing for the effect of maternal age on offspring age-specific reproductive performance were based on the minimal adequate models reported in (Bouwhuis et al., 2009). In short, these four models had clutch size, brood size, number of fledglings or number of recruits as dependent variables, and included fixed effects of female age, female age2, female ALR, year quality estimated as the total average fledgling number and local breeding density. The effect of maternal age was tested by also including maternal age, maternal age*female age, maternal age*female age2 and maternal ALR as fixed effects. Random effects included female identity, year and sector of the wood to account for repeated, nonindependent observations on the same bird and spatiotemporal environmental heterogeneity, respectively. Models were additive cross-classified random effect models fitted in MLwiN 2.02 using a Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithm and 100 000 iterations (Rasbash et al., 2005; Browne et al., 2007). The error structure used was normal for clutch size, brood size and number of fledglings, and Poisson for number of recruits. The full model (Table 1) was simplified by backward stepwise removal of nonsignificant terms, where significance was assessed using the Wald statistic. Note that if statistical tools allowing additive cross-classified random effect models for parameters with a combination of normal and Poisson error structures were available in a multivariate framework, the analyses described earlier could be combined in a single, multivariate analysis testing for overall effects of female and maternal age, or for age-effects on each reproductive trait whilst taking into account the covariance between these traits. At present such a modelling framework is, to the best of our knowledge, not available; hence, we report analyses of each dependent variable separately.

Table 1.   Additive cross-classified random effect models testing the effects of female age, maternal age and selected fixed effects on clutch size, brood size, number of fledglings and number of recruits.
 Clutch sizeBrood sizeNo. of fledglingsNo. of recruits
EstSEChiEstSEChiEstSEChiEstSEChi
  1. Estimates for random effects are marked by (r). Shown are parameter estimates with standard errors and significance (*< 0.001, **< 0.05, ***< 0.01).

  2. ALR, age at last reproduction.

Year quality0.510.0760.49*0.560.0847.85*0.970.05405.18*0.350.0540.77*
Local density−0.340.0630.90*−0.440.0737.25*−0.430.1018.60*−0.180.076.45**
Age0.550.1414.44*0.320.173.720.240.320.56−0.050.130.16
ALR0.020.030.460.020.030.400.090.053.270.030.022.25
Mat_age0.030.080.12−0.180.093.88**−0.160.161.02−0.080.071.20
Mat_ALR−0.050.033.11−0.030.030.720.020.040.160.030.022.04
Age2−0.070.036.26**−0.040.031.57−0.010.060.050.030.021.16
Mat_age*age0.020.070.090.230.087.76***0.200.151.790.110.072.91
Mat_age*age2−0.010.010.13−0.050.028.21***−0.040.032.32−0.030.014.23**
Female (r)1.140.07 0.960.08 1.390.21 0.090.05 
Year (r)0.130.04 0.220.07 0.010.01 0.130.04 
Area (r)1.250.05 2.160.08 5.830.22 0.010.01 
Offspring reproductive lifespan and lifetime reproductive success

To test the effect of maternal age on offspring reproductive lifespan (measured as ALR), and lifetime reproductive success (LRS, defined as the total number of recruits produced), we used two random effect models with Poisson distributed errors and a Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithm and 100 000 iterations in MLwiN 2.02. The models included maternal identity as a random effect to account for the fact that some offspring were hatched from the same mother. Fixed effects included in models for both female ALR and LRS were maternal age, maternal age2, maternal ALR and the interactions between maternal ALR and age.

Grand-recruits

Using all females for which we knew the number of grand-recruits produced by their daughters, i.e. 8023 breeding attempts by 5310 individual females, a first model testing the effect of female age on number of grand-recruits included fixed effects of female age, female age2, female ALR, female status (locally born vs. immigrant, 2-level class variable), year quality and local breeding density, and random effects of female identity, year and sector of the wood. In the second model, number of recruits was added as an extra covariate, to test whether age-effects surpassed those shown to affect their own offsprings’ recruitment (Bouwhuis et al., 2009). As described earlier, models were additive cross-classified random effect models fitted in MLwiN 2.02 using a Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithm and 100 000 iterations.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Offspring age-specific reproduction

Our previous analyses of age-specific reproduction revealed significant female age2 effects on four successive reproductive traits: clutch size, brood size, number of fledglings and number of recruits (Bouwhuis et al., 2009). For 3722 breeding attempts by 2482 female offsprings, aged 1 to 8, hatched from 1725 mothers of known age, we tested whether this quadratic effect of age interacted with the female’s mother’s age when she was hatched (maternal age, range 1–7 years) to explain reproductive performance. For clutch size, we found no evidence for such an interaction (Table 1), showing that females hatched from different-aged mothers show the same change in clutch size with age (Fig. 1a). For brood size, however, the interaction between maternal age and offspring age2 was significant (Table 1), such that offspring hatched from older mothers display a more pronounced decline at old age in the number of chicks they hatch than offspring hatched from younger mothers (Fig. 1b). For the number of young fledged, the parameter estimate for the interaction was identical to that for brood size, but failed to reach statistical significance (Table 1, Fig. 1c). For the number of recruited offspring, the interaction between maternal age and offspring age2 was again statistically significant (Table 1), the fitted model indicating higher early life reproductive output for offspring hatched from older mothers, but an earlier onset and stronger rate of senescence afterwards (Fig. 1d, and also see the Table S1 for analyses of the effect of maternal age per offspring age class).

image

Figure 1.  Age-specific reproductive performance in female great tits in relation to the age of their mother when they were hatched: (a) clutch size, (b) brood size, (c) number of fledglings, and (d) number of recruited offspring. Lines are the fitted values representing females hatched from mothers one standard deviation younger than average (short dash), females hatched from average-aged mothers (long dash) and females hatched from one standard deviation older than average-aged mothers (solid); the dotted line shows the overall mean.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Offspring reproductive lifespan and lifetime reproductive success

Among female recruits, ALR averaged 1.85 and ranged from 1 to 8 years. There was no evidence for a quadratic (mat_age2 = −0.006 ± 0.009, χ²1 = 0.425, = 0.514) or linear (mat_age = −0.013 ± 0.019, χ²1 = 0.519, = 0.471) effect of maternal age at hatching on offspring ALR (Fig. 2). There was, however, a nonsignificant tendency for maternal reproductive lifespan (which ranged from 1 to 9 years) to covary positively with offspring reproductive lifespan (mat_ALR = 0.017 ± 0.010, χ²1 = 3.032, = 0.082).

image

Figure 2.  Reproductive lifespan (age at last reproduction (ALR), black circles) and lifetime reproductive success (LRS, white circles) in female great tits in relation to the age of their mother when they were hatched, with 95% confidence intervals and sample size.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Female offspring LRS averaged 1.26 and ranged from 0 to 14 recruits. Again, there was no significant effect of maternal age, either quadratic (mat_age2 = 0.000 ± 0.015, χ²1 = 0.001, = 0.975), or linear (mat_age = −0.032 ± 0.029, χ²1 = 1.230, = 0.267, Fig. 2). There also was no effect of maternal reproductive lifespan (mat_ALR = 0.029 ± 0.019, χ²1 = 2.292, = 0.130) on offspring LRS.

Grand-recruits

As offspring LRS does not vary with maternal age, a female’s number of grand-recruits should mainly depend on her number of recruits, instead of her age. Indeed, our analyses of a female’s number of grand-recruits shows that her age is an important predictor when her number of recruits is not included as a covariate in the model, but is no longer significant when the number of recruits is added (Table 2).

Table 2.   Additive cross-classified random effect models testing the effects of female age and selected fixed effects on her number of grand-recruits without (left) and with (right) the number of recruits as a covariate.
 No. of grand-recruitsNo. of grand-recruits
EstSEChiEstSEChi
  1. Estimates for random effects are marked by (r). Shown are parameter estimates with standard errors and significance (**< 0.01, ***< 0.001).

  2. ALR, age at last reproduction.

No. of recruitsN/A  1.110.031514.99***
Year quality0.430.1020.16***0.130.092.03
Local density−0.370.147.26**−0.170.122.10
Status0.150.083.290.050.080.33
Female age0.230.088.92**0.090.090.93
ALR0.200.0431.96***0.110.0311.29***
Female age2−0.050.0112.06***−0.020.022.25
Female (r)3.160.19 1.980.12 
Year (r)0.520.15 0.490.14 
Area (r)3.187.63 0.030.03 

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Recently, several long-term studies have demonstrated age-specificity in recruit production (Brommer et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2007; Descamps et al., 2008; Bouwhuis et al., 2009). Here, we extended these analyses of offspring number to test for trans-generational effects of maternal age on the quality of recruited offspring.

We found no evidence for an effect of maternal age on offspring reproductive lifespan. Hence, whereas survival over the first year of life (i.e. survival to recruit to the breeding population) is compromised in offspring hatched from older mothers (Bouwhuis et al., 2009), survival during subsequent reproductive life is not. We therefore have no evidence for a classic Lansing effect (i.e. offspring longevity declining with maternal age, Lansing, 1947) in great tits, although this effect is commonly found in laboratory model species (Priest et al., 2002), including vertebrates (Tarin et al., 2005). Future studies may be able to test whether the absence of a Lansing effect is generally true in natural populations.

In contrast, our key result suggests that the effect of maternal age on offspring fitness becomes apparent through offspring reproduction and is mediated through differences in survival of the grand-offspring (to hatching, fledging, or recruitment) as a function of both maternal age and grand-maternal age when the mother was hatched. This follows from our finding that offspring hatched from older mothers are more successful in recruiting offspring early in life, but then suffer from advanced and stronger deterioration in reproductive performance later in life, despite laying the same number of eggs as offspring hatched from younger mothers. This finding resembles one in Drosophila, where daughters born from mothers which had mated more often, and were producing fewer offspring themselves, experienced enhanced early life, but reduced late-life, fertility (Priest et al., 2008). What could be the mechanism underlying such alternative life-history trajectories, in our case linking age-effects across generations? One possibility is that older mothers, whilst themselves suffering from physiological deterioration outweighing increased breeding experience, can still socially transfer their accumulated knowledge to their offspring (Maestripieri & Mateo, 2009). Increased early life reproductive output in these offspring might then be associated with higher costs of reproduction, exacerbating senescence later in life (as in Nussey et al., 2007; Descamps et al., 2008; Reed et al., 2008). Besides transmission of skills, the likelihood of territory inheritance could be increased in offspring hatched from older mothers. However, low annual survival rates, as well as sex-biased dispersal by females in the great tit (e.g. Szulkin & Sheldon, 2008), which is independent of maternal age (Bouwhuis et al., 2009), suggest that this effect is unlikely to account for the patterns observed in our population. Alternatively, and with a more physiological basis, offspring hatched from older mothers might optimize their reproductive effort in response to having a low residual reproductive value, for example because of expected costs of catch-up growth or increased costs of reproduction, which would drive them to invest more in early life reproduction, but suffer from accelerated senescence. Recent findings that fitness traits in offspring can be affected by genomic imprinting effects in response to changes in the maternal environment (e.g. Hager et al., 2009; although we are unaware of an example in birds), provide a potential mechanism for this scenario, and might underlie such a maternal effect (Mousseau & Fox, 1998b; Wolf, 2000). A third possibility is that lower maternal reproductive value, resulting from lowered survival prospects in older mothers, selects for increased early life reproductive effort in their daughters owing to reduced likelihood of maternal-offspring competition. Again, however, low annual survival rates and female-biased dispersal suggest that this may be a relatively weak effect in the great tit, compared to the potential effects in primates (Cant & Johnstone, 2008). Why such processes would only affect offspring reproduction, and not survival, is also unclear, and a better understanding of offspring physiology and behaviour in relation to maternal age is clearly required to start answering this fascinating question.

Finally, our analyses show that there is no effect of maternal age on offspring lifetime reproductive success. This contrasts with recent findings of a quadratic effect of maternal age on offspring LRS in female European rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus reaching maturity (Rodel et al., 2009), but seems robust given our large sample size and the extremely small parameter estimates for the maternal age-effects. The absence of an effect of maternal age on offspring LRS has two important implications. The first is that, although daughters hatched from different-aged mothers follow different life-history trajectories, these trajectories can be viewed as alternative strategies with the same overall fitness payoff, at least in the environment in which these birds were studied. However, a change in adult mortality rate would result in a change in the relative fitness of these alternatives. The second implication is that average post-recruitment offspring quality is similar for mothers of all ages, implying that senescence estimates based on numbers of recruited offspring (as in Bouwhuis et al., 2009) are likely to be unbiased, at least in our study system. This last implication is also supported by our analysis of the effect of female age on her number of grand-recruits; whereas female age2 is a good predictor of her number of grand-recruits, this relationship is no longer significant when controlling for the female’s number of recruits produced.

In conclusion, this study has linked offspring age-specific reproduction to maternal age at conception and thereby identified a new factor underlying variation in rates of ageing in a natural population. Our data add to the small, but growing number of studies explaining variation in rates of ageing in the wild (Nussey et al., 2007; Descamps et al., 2008; Reed et al., 2008) and suggest that such effects can, in addition to resulting from effects early in the life of focal individuals, be transmitted across generations. Further work will need, in addition to life-history differences, to focus on the possible physiological and epigenetic differences associated with age and its transmission across generations.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

We are indebted to the many generations of Wytham field workers without whom this study would not have been possible, and thank William Browne, Jarrod Hadfield, Oscar Vedder and Marcel Visser for helpful discussion and statistical advice. Two anonymous referees provided comments that improved the manuscript. S.V. was supported by an NWO Vici-grant, and the collection of data has been funded by grants and studentships from the UK Natural Environment and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councils (NERC and BBSRC, respectively).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information
  • Bouwhuis, S., Sheldon, B.C., Verhulst, S. & Charmantier, A. 2009. Great tits growing old: selective disappearance and the partitioning of senescence to stages within the breeding cycle. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 27692777.
  • Brommer, J.E., Wilson, A.J. & Gustafsson, L. 2007. Exploring the genetics of aging in a wild passerine bird. Am. Nat. 170: 643650.
  • Browne, W.J., McCleery, R.H., Sheldon, B.C. & Pettifor, R.A. 2007. Using cross-classified multivariate mixed response models with application to life history traits in great tits (Parus major). Stat. Model. 7: 217238.
  • Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. 2008. Reproductive conflict and the separation of reproductive generations in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 53325336.
  • Descamps, S., Boutin, S., Berteaux, D. & Gaillard, J.M. 2008. Age-specific variation in survival, reproductive success and offspring quality in red squirrels: evidence of senescence. Oikos 117: 14061416.
  • Doligez, B., Clobert, J., Pettifor, R.A., Rowcliffe, M., Gustafsson, L., Perrins, C.M. & McCleery, R.H. 2002. Costs of reproduction: assessing responses to brood size manipulation on life-history and behavioural traits using multi-state capture-recapture models. J. Appl. Stat. 29: 407423.
  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
  • Hager, R., Cheverud, J.M. & Wolf, J.B. 2009. Change in maternal environment induced by cross-fostering alters genetic and epigenetic effects on complex traits in mice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 276: 29492954.
  • Hamilton, W.D. 1966. Moulding of senescence by natural selection. J. Theor. Biol. 12: 1245.
  • Hayflick, L. 2000. The future of ageing. Nature 408: 267269.
  • Jones, O.R., Gaillard, J.M., Tuljapurkar, S., Alho, J.S., Armitage, K.B., Becker, P.H., Bize, P., Brommer, J., Charmantier, A., Charpentier, M., Clutton-Brock, T., Dobson, F.S., Festa-Bianchet, M., Gustafsson, L., Jensen, H., Jones, C.G., Lillandt, B. G., McCleery, R., Merilä, J., Neuhaus, P., Nicoll, M.A., Norris, K., Oli, M.K., Pemberton, J., Pietiäinen, H., Ringsby, T.H., Roulin, A., Saether, B.E., Setchell, J.M., Sheldon, B.C., Thompson, P.M., Weimerskirch, H., Jean Wickings, E. & Coulson, T. 2008. Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast-slow life-history continuum. Ecol. Lett. 11: 664673.
  • Keller, L.F., Reid, J.M. & Arcese, P. 2008. Testing evolutionary models of senescence in a natural population: age and inbreeding effects on fitness components in song sparrows. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 597604.
  • Kirkwood, T.B.L. & Austad, S.N. 2000. Why do we age? Nature 408: 233238.
  • Lansing, A.I. 1947. A transmissible, cumulative, and reversible factor in aging. J. Gerontol. 2: 228239.
  • Loison, A., Festa-Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J.M., Jorgenson, J.T. & Jullien, J.M. 1999. Age-specific survival in five populations of ungulates: evidence of senescence. Ecology 80: 25392554.
  • Maestripieri, D. & Mateo, J.M. 2009. Maternal Effects in Mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • McCleery, R.H. & Perrins, C.M. 1989. Great tit. In: Lifetime reproduction in birds (I.Newton, ed), pp. 3574. Academic Press, London.
  • McCleery, R.H., Pettifor, R.A., Armbruster, P., Meyer, K., Sheldon, B.C. & Perrins, C.M. 2004. Components of variance underlying fitness in a natural population of the great tit Parus major. Am. Nat. 164: E62E72.
  • Medawar, P.B. 1952. An Unsolved Problem in Biology. H.K. Lewis & co Ltd, London.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998a. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Mousseau, T.A. & Fox, C.W. 1998b. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 403407.
  • Nussey, D.H., Kruuk, L.E.B., Donald, A., Fowlie, M. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2006. The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. Ecol. Lett. 9: 13421350.
  • Nussey, D.H., Kruuk, L.E.B., Morris, A. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2007. Environmental conditions in early life influence ageing rates in a wild population of red deer. Curr. Biol. 17: R1000R1001.
  • Nussey, D.H., Coulson, T., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Gaillard, J.M. 2008. Measuring senescence in wild animal populations: towards a longitudinal approach. Funct. Ecol. 22: 393406.
  • Van De Pol, M. & Verhulst, S. 2006. Age-dependent traits: a new statistical model to separate within- and between-individual effects. Am. Nat. 167: 766773.
  • Priest, N.K., Mackowiak, B. & Promislow, D.E.L. 2002. The role of parental age effects on the evolution of aging. Evolution 56: 927935.
  • Priest, N.K., Roach, D.A. & Galloway, L.F. 2008. Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biology Letters 4: 68.
  • Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. & Prosser, B. 2005. A User’s Guide to MLwiN – Version 2.0. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, London.
  • Reed, T.E., Kruuk, L.E.B., Wanless, S., Frederiksen, M., Cunningham, E.J.A. & Harris, M.P. 2008. Reproductive senescence in a long-lived seabird: rates of decline in late-life performance are associated with varying costs of early reproduction. Am. Nat. 171: E89E101.
  • Rodel, H.G., Von Holst, D. & Kraus, C. 2009. Family legacies: short- and long-term fitness consequences of early-life conditions in female European rabbits. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 789797.
  • Svensson, L. 1994. Identification Guide to European Passerines. Fingraf AB, Sweden.
  • Szulkin, M. & Sheldon, B.C. 2008. Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 703711.
  • Tarin, J.J., Gomez-Piquer, V., Rausell, F., Navarro, S., Hermenegildo, C. & Cano, A. 2005. Delayed motherhood decreases life expectancy of mouse offspring. Biol. Reprod. 72: 13361343.
  • Williams, G.C. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11: 398411.
  • Wilson, A.J., Nussey, D.H., Pemberton, J.M., Pilkington, J.G., Morris, A., Pelletier, F., Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2007. Evidence for a genetic basis of aging in two wild vertebrate populations. Curr. Biol. 17: 21362142.
  • Wolf, J.B. 2000. Gene interactions from maternal effects. Evolution 54: 18821898.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Table S1 Parameter estimates with standard errors for the effect of maternal age (range 1-9) on daughter age-specific recruit production. Positive estimates show that daughters hatched from older mothers have better reproductive performance, whereas negative estimates indicate reproductive performance of daughters hatched from older mothers to be reduced

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
JEB_1929_sm_Supportinginformation.doc39KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.