SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arak, A. 1983. Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Mate Choice (P.Bateson, ed), pp. 332. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Arnqvist, G. 2006. Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 361: 375386.
  • Barnard, C. 2004. Animal Behaviour: Mechanism, Development, Ecology and Evolution. Pearson & Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex.
  • Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer, Sunderland.
  • Burghardt, G.M. 1970. Defining “communication”. In: Advances in Chemoreception, Volume I: Communication by Chemical Signals (J.W.Johnston, D.G.Moulton & A.Turk, eds), pp. 518. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
  • Cheney, D. & Seyfarth, R. 1990. Attending to behaviour versus attending to knowledge: examining monkeys’ attribution of mental states. Anim. Behav. 40: 742753.
  • Cuthill, I. 2009. The study of function in behavioural ecology. In: Tinbergen’s Legacy (J.J.Bolhuis & S.Verhulst, eds), pp. 107126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Dall, S.R.X., Giraldeau, L.A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J.M. & Stephens, D.W. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. TREE 20: 187193.
  • Dawkins, M.S. 1995. Unravelling Animal Behaviour, 2nd edn. Longman, Harlow, Essex.
  • Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. 1978. Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (J.R.Krebs & N.B.Davies, eds), pp. 380402. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Endler, J.A. & Basolo, A.L. 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. TREE 13: 415420.
  • Evans, C.S. 1997. Referential signals. In: Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 12 (D.Owings, M.D.Beecher & N.S.Thompson, eds), pp. 99143. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Fleishman, L.J. 1992. The influence of the sensory system and the environment on motion patterns in the visual displays of anoline lizards and other vertebrates. Am. Nat. 139: S36S61.
  • Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theo. Biol. 144: 517546.
  • Green, S. & Marler, P. 1979. The analysis of animal communication. In: Social Behavior and Communication, Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, Vol. 3 (P.Marler & J.Vandenbergh, eds), pp. 73158. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Greenfield, M.D. 2002. Signallers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Grether, G.F. 2000. Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 54: 17121724.
  • Guilford, T. & Dawkins, M.S. 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim. Behav. 42: 114.
  • Hailman, J.P. 1977. Optical Signals: Animal Communication and Light. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
  • Halliday, T.R. 1983. Information and communication. In: Communication, Volume 2 (T.R.Halliday & P.J.B.Slater, eds), pp. 4381. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Harper, D.G.C. 1991. Communication. In: Behavioural Ecology; An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn (J.R.Krebs & N.B.Davies, eds), pp. 374397. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Hasson, O. 1989. Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection: a different emphasis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 235: 383406.
  • Hasson, O. 1990. The role of amplifiers in sexual selection: an integration of the amplifying and the Fisherian mechanisms. Evol. Ecol. 4: 277289.
  • Hasson, O. 1991. Sexual displays as amplifiers. Behav. Ecol. 2: 189197.
  • Hasson, O. 1994. Cheating signals. J. Theo. Biol. 167: 223238.
  • Hauser, M. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.
  • Hinde, R.A. 1981. Animal signals: ethological and games-theory approaches are not incompatible. Anim. Behav. 29: 535542.
  • Houde, E.H. & Torio, A.J. 1992. Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 3: 346351.
  • Hurd, P.L. & Enquist, M. 2001. Threat display in birds. Can. J. Zool. 79: 931942.
  • Johnstone, R.A. 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351: 329338.
  • Johnstone, R.A. 1997. The evolution of animal signals. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (J.R.Krebs & N.B.Davies, eds), pp. 155178. Blackwell, Cambridge.
  • Kodric-Brown, A. 1989. Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 393401.
  • Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Krebs, J.R. & Dawkins, R. 1984. Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (J.R.Krebs & N.B.Davies, eds), pp. 380402. Blackwell, Cambridge.
  • Lloyd, J.E. 1965. Aggressive mimicry in Photuris: firefly femmes fatales. Science 149: 653654.
  • Macías-García, C. & Ramirez, E. 2005. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434: 501504.
  • Marler, P. 1967. Animal communication signals. Science 157: 769774.
  • Marler, P. 1977. The evolution of communication. In: How Animals Communicate (T.A.Sebeok, ed), pp. 4570. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
  • Maynard Smith, J. 2000. The concept of information in biology. Phil. Sci. 67: 177194.
  • Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D.G.C. 1995. Animal signals: models and terminology. J. Theo. Biol. 177: 305311.
  • Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • McGregor, P.K. 2005. Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Millikan, R.G. 1989. Biosemantics. J. Phil. 86: 281297.
  • Morton, E.S. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am. Nat. 111: 855869.
  • Otte, D. 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 385417.
  • Owren, M.J. 2000. Standing evolution on its head: the uneasy role of evolutionary theory in comparative cognition and communication. Rev. Anthrop. 26: 5569.
  • Penn, D.C. & Povinelli, D.J. 2007. On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 362: 731744.
  • Rendall, D., Owren, M.J. & Ryan, M.J. 2009. What do animal signals mean? Anim. Behav. 78: 233240.
  • Rodd, H.F., Hughes, K.A., Grether, G.F. & Baril, C.T. 2002. A possible non-sexual origin for a mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 275281.
  • Rowe, C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim. Behav. 58: 921931.
  • Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1993. Phylogenetic patterns of behavioral mate recognition systems in Physalaemus pustulosus species (Anura: Leptodactyllidae): the role of ancestral and derived characters and sensory exploitation. Linnean Soc. Symp. Ser. 14: 251267.
  • Ryan, M.J., Fox, J.H., Wilczynski, W. & Rand, A.S. 1990. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343: 6667.
  • Scott-Phillips, T.C. 2008. Defining biological communication. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 387395.
  • Searcy, W.A. & Nowicki, S. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signalling Systems, 1st edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Seyfarth, R.M. & Cheney, D.L. 2003. Signallers and receivers in animal communication. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54: 145173.
  • Slater, P.J.B. 1983. The study of communication. In: Animal Behaviour, Volume 2: Communication (T.R.Halliday & P.J.B.Slater, eds), pp. 942. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Smith, W.J. 1977. The Behavior of Communicating (An Ethological Approach). Harvard University Press, London.
  • Stegmann, U.E. 2005. John Maynard Smith’s notion of animal signals. Biol. Phil. 20: 10111025.
  • Stuart-Fox, D. 2005. Deception and the origin of honest signals. TREE 20: 521523.
  • Taylor, P.W., Hasson, O. & Clark, D.L. 2000. Body postures and patterns as amplifiers of physical condition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 917922.
  • Tinbergen, N. 1951. The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Whiting, M.J. & Bateman, P.W. 1999. Male preference for large females in the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi (Sauria: Cordylidae). J. Herp. 33: 309312.
  • Whiting, M.J., Stuart-Fox, D., O’Connor, D., Firth, D., Bennett, N.C. & Blomberg, S.P. 2006. Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard. Anim. Behav. 72: 353363.
  • Whiting, M.J., Webb, J.N. & Keough, J.S. 2009. Flat lizard female mimics use sexual deception in visual but not chemical signals. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 15851591.
  • Wilczynski, W., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. 2001. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain Behav. Evol. 58: 137151.
  • Wiley, R.H. 1983. The evolution of communication: information and manipulation. In: Animal Behaviour, Volume 2 (T.R.Halliday & P.J.B.Slater, eds), pp. 156189. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Wiley, R.H. 1994. Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication. In: Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecology (L.Real, ed), pp. 157189. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.