SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman, J.D., Meléndez-Ackerman, E.J. & Salguero-Faria, J. 1997. Variation in pollinator abundance and selection on fragrance phenotypes in an epiphytic orchid. Am. J. Bot. 84: 13831390.
  • Aigner, P.A. 2001. Optimality modelling and fitness trade-offs: when should plants became pollinator specialists? Oikos 95: 177184.
  • Anderson, B. & Johnson, S.D. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62: 220225.
  • Anderson, B. & Johnson, S.D. 2009. Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytol. 182: 533540.
  • Anderson, B. & Johnson, S.D. 2010. Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Evolution 64: 960972.
  • Andersson, S. 1994. Floral stability, pollination efficiency, and experimental manipulation of the corolla phenotype in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 81: 13971402.
  • Armbruster, W.S., Pélabon, C., Hansen, T.F. & Mulder, C.P.H. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M.Pigliucci & K.Preston, eds), pp. 2349. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Ashman, T.-L. & Majetic, C.J. 2006. Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96: 343352.
  • Ashman, T.-L. & Morgan, M.T. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 553559.
  • Benitez-Vieyra, S., Medina, A.M. & Cocucci, A.A. 2009. Variable selection patterns on the labellum shape of Geoblasta pennicillata, a sexually deceptive orchid. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 23542362.
  • Brodie, E.D. III & Ridenhour, B.J. 2003. Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43: 408419.
  • Brodie, E.D. III, Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313318.
  • Burd, M. 1994. A probabilistic analysis of pollinator behavior and seed production in Lobelia deckenii. Ecology 75: 16351646.
  • Campbell, D.R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43: 318334.
  • Campbell, D.R. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am. Nat. 137: 713737.
  • Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M. & Meléndez-Ackerman, E.J. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am. Nat. 149: 295315.
  • Caruso, C.M., Peterson, S.B. & Ridley, C.E. 2003. Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation. Am. J. Bot. 90: 13331340.
  • Cocucci, A.A. 1991. Pollination biology of Nierembergia (Solanaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 174: 1735.
  • Cocucci, A.A., Sérsic, A.N. & Roig-Alsina, A. 2000. Oil-collecting structures in Tapinotaspidini: their diversity, function and probable origin (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mitt. Münch. Entomol. Ges. 90: 5174.
  • Conner, J.K., Rush, S. & Jennetten, P. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). I. Selection through lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50: 11271136.
  • Cosacov, A., Nattero, J. & Cocucci, A.A. 2008. Variation of pollinator assemblages and pollen limitation in a locally specialized system: the oil producing Nierembergia linariifolia (Solanaceae). Ann. Bot. 102: 723734.
  • Dafni, A. & Kevan, P.G. 1997. Flower size and shape: implications in pollination. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45: 201211.
  • Faegri, K. & Van Der Pijl, L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • Fenster, C.B., Armbruster, W.S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M.R. & Thomson, J.T. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 375403.
  • Fenster, C.B., Cheely, G., Dudash, M.R. & Reynolds, R.J. 2006. Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93: 18001807.
  • Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882890.
  • Galen, C. 2000. High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am. Nat. 156: 7283.
  • Galen, C. & Cuba, J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55: 19631971.
  • Galen, C. & Stanton, M. 1989. Bumble bee pollination and floral morphology: factors influencing pollen dispersal in the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76: 419426.
  • Geber, M.A. 1985. The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata. Ecology 66: 762772.
  • Gómez, J.M., Perfectti, F. & Camacho, J.P.M. 2006. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. Am. Nat. 168: 531545.
  • Gomulkiewicz, R., Drown, D.M., Dybdahl, M.F., Godsoe, W., Nuismer, S.L., Pepin, K.M., Ridenhour, B.J., Smith, C.I. & Yoder, J.B. 2007. Dos and don’ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Heredity 98: 249258.
  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. University of Oslo, Oslo.
  • Hanifin, C.T., Brodie, E.D. Jr & Brodie, E.D. 2008. Phenotypic mismatches reveal escape from arms-race coevolution. PLoS Biol. 6: 471482.
  • Heisler, I.L. & Damuth, J. 1987. A method for analyzing selection in hierarchically structured populations. Am. Nat. 130: 582602.
  • Herrera, C.M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawkmoth-pollinated violet. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 251275.
  • Herrera, C.M. 2001. Deconstructing a floral phenotype: do pollinators select for corolla integration in Lavandula latifolia? J. Evol. Biol. 14: 574584.
  • Herrera, C.M., Castellanos, M.C. & Medrano, M. 2006. Geographical context of floral evolution: towards an improved research programme in floral diversification. In: Ecology and Evolution of Flowers (L.D.Harder & S.C.H.Barrett, eds), pp. 278294. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Johnson, S.D. & Dafni, A. 1998. Response of bee-flies to the shape and pattern of model flowers: implications for floral evolution in a Mediterranean herb. Func. Ecol. 12: 289297.
  • Johnson, S.G., Delph, L.F. & Elderkin, C.L. 1995. The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana. Oecologia 102: 174179.
  • Johnston, M.O. 1991. Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45: 14681479.
  • Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245261.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurements of selection on correlated traits. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Lehrer, M., Horridge, G.A., Zhang, S.W. & Gadagkar, R. 1995. Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 347: 123137.
  • Maad, J. 2000. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54: 112123.
  • Maad, J. & Alexandersson, R. 2004. Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 642650.
  • Medel, R., Botto-Mahan, C. & Kalin-Arroyo, M. 2003. Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 84: 17211732.
  • Medel, R., Valiente, A., Botto-Mahan, C., Carvallo, G., Pérez, F., Pohl, N. & Navarro, L. 2007. The influence of insects and hummingbirds on the geographical variation of the flower phenotype in Mimulus luteus. Ecography 30: 812818.
  • Miller, R.B. 1981. Hawkmoths and the geographic patterns of floral variation in Aquilegia caerula. Evolution 35: 763774.
  • Mitchell, R.J. 1994. Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am. Nat. 143: 870889.
  • Nagy, E.S. 1997. Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution 51: 14691480.
  • Nattero, J. & Cocucci, A.A. 2007. Geographical variation in floral traits of the tree tobacco in relation to its hummingbird pollinator fauna. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90: 657667.
  • Pellmyr, O. 1988. Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) assess pollen availability in Anemonopsis macrophylla (Ranunculaceae) through floral shape. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81: 792797.
  • Rohlf, F.J. & Marcus, L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 129132.
  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849861.
  • Simpson, B.B. & Neff, J.L. 1981. Floral rewards: alternatives to pollen and nectar. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 68: 301322.
  • Stebbins, G.L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1: 307326.
  • Stinchcombe, J.R., Agrawal, A.F., Hohenlohe, P.A., Arnold, S.J. & Blows, M.W. 2008. Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing?. Evolution 62: 24352440.
  • Stone, G.N., Willmer, P. & Rowe, J.A. 1998. Partitioning of pollinators during flowering in an African Acacia community. Ecology 79: 28082827.
  • Thompson, J.N. 2005. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Totland, Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology 82: 22332244.
  • Utelli, A.B. & Roy, B.A. 2000. Pollinator abundance and behaviour on Aconitum lycoctonum (Ranunculaceae): an analysis of the quantity and quality components of pollination. Oikos 89: 461470.
  • Vaughton, G. & Ramsey, M. 1998. Floral display, pollina-tor visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia 115: 93101.
  • Waser, N.M. 1983. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. In: Pollination Biology (L.Real, ed), pp. 241285. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  • Waser, N.M. & Campbell, D.R. 2004. Ecological speciation in flowering plants. In: Adaptive Speciation (U.Dieckmann, M.Doebeli, J.A.J.Metz & D.Tautz, eds), pp. 264277. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Waser, N.M. & Price, M. 1983. Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and nature of plant-pollinator interaction. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C.Jones & R.Little, eds), pp. 341359. Van Nostrand-Reinhold Publishers, New York.
  • Waser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M. & Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 10431060.
  • Whittall, J.B. & Hodges, S.A. 2007. Pollination shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447: 706709.
  • Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D. & Fink, W.L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, London.