The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection
Article first published online: 17 AUG 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 23, Issue 10, pages 2031–2045, October 2010
How to Cite
INGLEBY, F. C., HUNT, J. and HOSKEN, D. J. (2010), The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 2031–2045. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02080.x
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 17 AUG 2010
- Received 13 April 2010; revised 21 June 2010; accepted 28 June 2010
- 2008. Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275: 2645–2650. &
- 2009. Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information. Biol. Lett. 5: 449–451. &
- 1999. The study of intersexual selection using quantitative genetics. Behaviour 136: 1237–1265.
- 2001. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 71–76. , , , &
- 1975. Modes of animal speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 339–364.
- 2008. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica 143: 69–78. , , , &
- 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78: 575–595.
- 2005. Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 1415–1425. &
- 2006. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 532–542. , &
- 2009. Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance. Genetica 136: 27–36. , &
- 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406: 186–188. , , &
- 2008. Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 145–160.
- 2003. Genetic basis of male sexual behavior. J. Neurobiol. 54: 93–100. &
- 2008. Genetic variance and genotype reaction norms in response to larval food manipulation for a trait important in scorpionfly sperm competition. Funct. Ecol. 22: 127–133.
- 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61: 1106–1119. , , , , &
- 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am. Nat. 86: 293–298.
- 1989. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121: 129–138. &
- 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144: 517–546.
- 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296: 707–711. &
- 2004. Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68: 1461–1468. &
- 2000. Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 54: 1712–1724.
- 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 13390–13395.
- 1976. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 1–32. , &
- 2006. Paternal age and offspring growth: separating the intrinsic quality of young from rearing effects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 672–682. , &
- 2009. Environmental heterogeneity, genotype-by-interactions and the reliability of sexual traits as indicators of mate quality. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279: 1153–1159. &
- 1999. Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 96–101. &
- 2003. Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in male field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol. 14: 353–359. , &
- 1997. When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1057–1063. &
- 2000. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54: 953–967. , &
- 1995. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol. Rev. 70: 1–65.
- 1996. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, New York. &
- 2007. Condition dependence, quantitative genetics, and the potential signal content of iridescent ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Evolution 61: 168–183. &
- 2008. Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 18: 1384–1389. , , , &
- 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33–38. &
- 2008. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 132: 209–216. &
- 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 42–66. , &
- 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection of polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721–3725.
- 2006. Genome-wide scan reveals that genetic variation for transcriptional plasticity in yeast is biased towards multi-copy and dispensable genes. Gene, 366: 343–351. , , &
- 2008. Effects of genetics and light environment on colour expression in threespine sticklebacks. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 663–673. &
- 2006. Mapping determinants of gene expression plasticity by genetical genomics in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2: 2155–2161. , , , , , , , , , , &
- 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. &
- 1980. Genetic variance, fitness, and homeostasis in varying environments: an experimental check of the theory. Evolution 34: 1219–1222.
- 2004. Quantitative models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 264–271. &
- 2005. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness. Evolution 59: 2414–2425. &
- 2007. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 1279–1286. &
- 2007. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution 61: 1748–1757. , , , , &
- 1999. Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 85–91. &
- 2008. Hemiclonal analysis reveals significant genetic, environmental and genotype x environment effects on sperm size in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1692–1702. , &
- 2007. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 831–844. , &
- 1980. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49: 1271–1277. &
- 1999. Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53: 1564–1572.
- 2003. Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57: 1304–1313. &
- 1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage Publications, California.
- 1999. Competition and genotype-by-environment interaction in natural breeding substrates of Drosophila. Evolution 53: 175–186. , &
- 2003a. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav. 65: 721–727. , &
- 2003b. The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 1779–1784. , &
- 2005. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 59: 645–657. , , , , &
- 1999. Quantitative trait loci affecting survival and fertility-related traits in Caenorhabditis elegans show genotype-environment interactions, pleiotropy and epistasis. Genetics 153: 1233–1243. &
- 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. &
- 1996. Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1305–1311. &
- 2007. The heritability of attractiveness. Curr. Biol. 17: R959–R960. , &
- 1995. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: genetic variability within and across different grains in Tribolium castaneum. Heredity 74: 80–90. &
- 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505–522. &
- 1990. Genotype-environment interaction for climate and competition in a natural population of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 44: 2004–2011.
- 2000. Epistasis as a genetic constraint within populations and an accelerant of adaptive divergence among them. In: Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J.B.Wolf, E.D.Brodie & M.J.Wade, eds), pp. 213–231. Oxford University Press, New York.
- 1999. Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53: 620–625. &
- 2003. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57: 883–893.
- 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.
- 2000. Evidence of social effects on mate choice in vertebrates. Behav. Process. 51: 167–175. &
- 2010. Interacting phenotypes and indirect genetic effects. In: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (D.F.Westneat & C.W.Fox, eds), pp. 225–245. Oxford University Press, New York. &
- 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64–69. , , , &
- 1999. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153: 254–266. , &
- 2004. The genotype-environment interaction and evolution when the environment contains genes. In: Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches (T.J.DeWitt & S.M.Scheiner, eds), pp. 173–190. Oxford University Press, New York. , &
- 2008. The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition. Genetica 134: 89–97. , &
- 1975. Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.