Does a trade-off between current reproductive success and survival affect the honesty of male signalling in species with male parental care?
Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 23, Issue 11, pages 2461–2473, November 2010
How to Cite
KELLY, N. B. and ALONZO, S. H. (2010), Does a trade-off between current reproductive success and survival affect the honesty of male signalling in species with male parental care?. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 2461–2473. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02111.x
- Issue published online: 21 OCT 2010
- Article first published online: 21 SEP 2010
- Received 18 April 2010; revised 10 August 2010; accepted 12 August 2010
- 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804–816.
- 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- 2003. Context-dependent sexual advertisement: plasticity in development of sexual ornamentation throughout the lifetime of a passerine bird. J. Evol. Bio. 16: 1065–1076. &
- 2002. Paternal care as a conditional strategy: distinct reproductive tactics associated with elaboration of plumage ornamentation in the house finch. Behav. Ecol. 13: 591–597. &
- 1994. Female mate choice and male red coloration in a natural three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) population. Behav. Ecol. 5: 74–80. &
- 1999. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim. Behav. 58: 1261–1267.
- 2000a. Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2425–2430.
- 2000b. Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male-male competition ensures honesty. Anim. Behav. 60: 417–422.
- 2004. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428: 742–745. , &
- 2003. Elaborately ornamented males avoid costly parental care in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus): a proximate perspective. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 176–183. , &
- 1990a. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144: 517–546.
- 1990b. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144: 473–516.
- 2009. Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow. Behav. Ecol. 20: 1072–1078. , , &
- 1997. The Diversity of Fishes. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford. , &
- 2002. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 97–104. &
- 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72: 283–327. &
- 2008. Evolution of parental favoritism among different-aged offspring. Behav. Ecol. 19: 344–352.
- 2009. Will male advertisement be a reliable indicator of paternal care, if offspring survival depends on male care? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276: 3175–3183. &
- 1998. Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1871–1878.
- 2005. Female Iberian wall lizards prefer male scents that signal a better cell-mediated immune response. Biol. Lett. 1: 404–406. &
- 1979. Models of parent-offspring conflict. III. Intra-brood conflict. Anim. Behav. 27: 1202–1209. &
- 2003. Quantifying male attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 1925–1932. , , , &
- 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88: 401–415. &
- 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 397–407. &
- 1989. How selfish should stronger sibs be? Am. Nat. 133: 846–868. , &
- 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48: 187–211. , &
- 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, New York.
- 1992. Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 247: 169–174.
- 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- 1975. Mate selection – selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.