SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Armbruster, W.S., Antonsen, L. & Pélabon, C. 2005. Phenotypic selection on Dalechampia blossoms: honest signaling affects pollination success. Ecology 86: 33233333.
  • Ashman, T.-L. & Majetic, C.J. 2006. Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96: 343352.
  • Barret, S.C.H. 1978. Heterostyly in a tropical weed: the reproductive biology of Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Can. J. Bot. 56: 17131725.
  • Benitez-Vieyra, S., Medina, A.M., Glinos, E. & Cocucci, A.A. 2006. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Funct. Ecol. 20: 948957.
  • Biernaskie, J.M., Walker, S.C. & Gegear, R.J. 2009. Bumblebees learn to forage like bayesians. Am. Nat. 174: 413423.
  • Blarer, A., Keasar, T. & Shmida, A. 2002. Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees. Ethology 108: 341351.
  • Box, G.E.P & Tiao, G.C. 1979. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Brodie III, E.D., Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313318.
  • Castillo, R.A., Cordero, C. & Domínguez, C.A. 2002. Are reward polymorphisms subject to frequency- and density-dependent selection? Evidence from a monoecious species pollinated by deceit. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 544552.
  • Chittka, L. & Raine, N.E. 2006. Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9: 428435.
  • Chittka, L., Skorupski, P. & Raine, N.E. 2009. Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 400407.
  • Cresswell, J.E. & Galen, C. 1991. Frequency-dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations: the pollination of Polemonium viscosum. Am. Nat. 138: 13421353.
  • Cruden, R.W., Hermann-Parker, S.M. & Peterson, S. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant pollinator coevolution. In: Biology of Nectaries (T.S.Elias & B.A.Bentley, eds), pp. 80125. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Cuautle, M. & Rico-Gray, V. 2003. The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Funct. Ecol. 17: 417423.
  • Cuautle, M., Rico-Gray, V. & Diaz-Castelazo, C. 2005. Effects of ant behaviour and presence of extrafloral nectaries on seed dispersal of the Neotropical myrmecochore Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86: 6777.
  • Dafni, A. 1984. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 259278.
  • Dall, S.R.X., Giraldeau, L.-A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J.M. & Stephens, D.W. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 187196.
  • Dixon, P.M. 1993. Population sampling and bootstrapping in complex designs. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (S.M.Scheiner & J.Gurevitch, eds), pp. 290318. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Dukas, R. & Real, L.A. 1993. Effects of recent experience on foraging decisions by bumble bees. Oecologia 94: 244246.
  • Elias, T.S., Rozich, W.R. & Newcombe, L. 1975. The foliar and floral nectaries of Turnera ulmifolia L. Am. J. Bot. 62: 570576.
  • Feinsinger, P. 1983. Variable nectar secretion in a Heliconia species pollinated by hermit hummingbirds. Biotropica 15:4852.
  • Fenster, C.B., Cheely, G., Dudash, M.R. & Reynolds, R.J. 2006. Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93: 18001807.
  • Garrido, J.L., Rey, P.J. & Herrera, C.M. 2009. Influence of elaiosome on postdispersal dynamics of an ant-dispersed plant. Acta Oecol. 35: 393399.
  • Golubov, J., Eguiarte, L.E., Mandujano, M.C., López-Portillo, J. & Montaña, C. 1999. Why be a honeyless honey mesquite? Reproduction and mating system of nectarful and nectarless individuals. Am. J. Bot. 86: 955963.
  • Gómez, J.M., Bosch, J., Perfectti, F., Fernández, J.D., Abdelaziz, M. & Camacho, J.P.M. 2008. Association between floral traits and rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Ann. Bot. 101: 14131420.
  • Gross, J., Husband, B.C. & Stewart, S.C. 1998. Phenotypic selection in a natural population of Impatiens pallida Nutt. (Balsaminaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 11: 589609.
  • Haining, R. 2003. Spatial Data Analysis. Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Harder, L.D. & Johnson, S.D. 2009. Darwin’s beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytol. 183: 530545.
  • Healy, S.D. & Hurly, T.A. 2001. Foraging and spatial learning in hummingbirds. In: Cognitive Ecology of Pollination (L.Chittka & J.D.Thomson, eds), pp. 127147. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Herrera, C.M. 2009. Multiplicity in Unity. Plant Subindividual Variation & Interactions with Animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Kearns, C.A. & Inouye, D.W. 1993. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.
  • Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Leiss, K.A., Vrieling, K. & Klinkhamer, P.G.L. 2004. Heritability of nectar production in Echium vulgare. Heredity 92: 446451.
  • Maad, J. & Alexandersson, R. 2004. Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 642650.
  • Martin, N.H. 2004. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 777782.
  • Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D.G.C. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • McLinn, C.M. & Stephens, D.W. 2006. What makes information valuable: signal reliability and environmental uncertainty. Anim. Behav. 71: 11191129.
  • Ohashi, K. & Yahara, T. 2002. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Funct. Ecol. 16: 492503.
  • Ordano, M. & Ornelas, J.F. 2005. The cost of nectar replenishment in two epiphytic bromeliads. J. Trop. Ecol. 21: 541547.
  • Pleasants, J.M. & Chaplin, S.J. 1983. Nectar production rates of Asclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation. Oecologia 59: 232238.
  • Pyke, G.H. 1991. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350: 5859.
  • Raguso, R.A. 2004. Flowers as sensory billboards: progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 434440.
  • Raguso, R.A. 2008. Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 549569.
  • Rathcke, B.J. 1992. Nectar distribution, pollinator behaviour, and plant reproductive success. In: Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal-Plant Interactions (M.D.Hunter, T.Ohgushi & P.W.Price, eds), pp. 113118. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Renner, S.S. 2006. Rewardless flowers in Angiosperms and the role of insect cognition in their evolution. In: Plant-Pollinator Interactions. From Specialization to Generalization (N.M.Waser & J.Ollerton, eds), pp. 123144. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Schaefer, H.M., Scheafer, V. & Levey, D.J. 2004. How plant–animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 577584.
  • Schiestl, F.P. 2005. On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids. Naturwissenschaften 92: 255264.
  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849861.
  • Simpson, B.B. & Neff, J.L. 1983. Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C.E.Jones & R.J.Little, eds), pp. 142153. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
  • Southwick, E.E. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment. Ecology 65: 17751779.
  • Torres-Hernández, L., Rico-Gray, V., Castillo-Guevara, C. & Vergara, J.A. 2000. Effect of nectar-foraging ants on the reproductive fitness of Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae) in a coastal sand dune in Mexico. Acta Zool. Mex. 81: 1321.
  • Valone, T.J. 2006. Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos 112: 252259.
  • Weiss, M.R. 2001. Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In: Cognitive Ecology of Pollination (L.Chittka & J.D.Thomson, eds), pp. 171190. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.