SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andraso, G.M. 1997. A comparison of startle response in two morphs of the brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans): further evidence for a trade-off between defensive morphology and swimming ability. Evol. Ecol. 11: 8390.
  • Arnold, S.J. 1983. Morphology, performance and fitness. Am. Zool. 23: 347361.
  • Beamish, F.W.H. 1978. Swimming capacity. In: Fish Physiology, Vol. 7 (W.S.Hoar & J.D.Randall, eds), pp. 101187. Academic Press, New York.
  • Bergstrom, C.A. 2002. Fast-start swimming performance and reduction in lateral plate number in threespine stickleback. Can. J. Zool. 80: 207213.
  • Berner, D., Adams, D.C., Grandchamp, A.-C. & Hendry, A.P. 2008. Natural selection drives patterns of lake-stream divergence in stickleback foraging morphology. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 16531665.
  • Berner, D., Grandchamp, A.-C. & Hendry, A.P. 2009. Variable progress toward ecological speciation in parapatry: stickleback across eight lake-stream transitions. Evolution 63: 17401753.
  • Billerbeck, J.M., Lankford, T.E. Jr & Conover, D.O. 2001. Evolution of intrinsic growth and energy acquisition rates. I. Trade-offs with swimming performance in Menidia menidia. Evolution 55: 18631872.
  • Blake, R.W. 2004. Fish functional design and swimming performance. J. Fish Biol. 65: 11931222.
  • Blake, R.W., Law, T.C., Chan, K.H.S. & Li, J.F.Z. 2005. Comparison of the prolonged swimming performances of closely related, morphologically distinct three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus spp. J. Fish Biol. 67: 834848.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Brett, J.R. 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 21: 11831226.
  • Calsbeek, R. 2008. An ecological twist on the morphology-performance-fitness axis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10: 197212.
  • Delcourt, M., Räsänen, K. & Hendry, A.P. 2008. Genetic and plastic components of divergent male intersexual behavior in Misty lake/stream stickleback. Behav. Ecol. 19: 12171224.
  • Domenici, P. 2003. Habitat, body design and the swimming performance of fish. In: Vertebrate Biomechanics and Evolution (V.L.Bels, J.-P.Gasc & A.Casinos, eds), pp. 137160. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford.
  • Domenici, P. & Blake, R.W. 1997. The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J. Exp. Biol. 200: 11651178.
  • Emerson, S.B., Travis, J. & Koehl, M.A.R. 1990. Functional complexes and additivity in performance: a test case with “flying” frogs. Evolution 44: 21532157.
  • Garenc, C., Couture, P., Laflamme, M.-A. & Guderley, H. 1999. Metabolic correlates of burst swimming capacity of juvenile and adult threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Comp. Physiol. B. 169: 113122.
  • Ghalambor, C.K., Walker, J.A. & Reznick, D.N. 2003. Multi-trait selection, adaptation, and constraints on the evolution of burst swimming performance. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43: 431438.
  • Ghalambor, C.K., Reznick, D.N. & Walker, J.A. 2004. Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start swimming performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Peocilia reticulata). Am. Nat. 164: 3850.
  • Gross, H.P. 1978. Natural selection by predators on the defensive apparatus of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Can. J. Zool. 56: 398413.
  • Hagen, D.W. & Gilbertson, L.G. 1972. Geographic variation and environmental selection in Gasterosteus aculeatus L. in the Pacific Northwest, America. Evolution 26: 3251.
  • Harper, D.G. & Blake, R.W. 1988. On the error involved in high-speed film when used to evaluate maximum accelerations of fish. Can. J. Zool. 67: 19291936.
  • Hatfield, T. & Schluter, D. 1996. A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 50: 24292434.
  • Hendry, A.P., Taylor, E.B. & McPhail, J.D. 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution 56: 11991216.
  • Herrel, A., Huyghe, K., Vanhooydonck, B., Backeljau, T., Breugelmans, K., Grbac, I., Van Damme, R. & Irschick, D.J. 2008. Rapid large-scale evolutionary divergence in morphology and performance associated with exploitation of a different dietary source. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105: 47924795.
  • Irschick, D.J. & Meyers, J.J. 2007. An analysis of the relative roles of plasticity and natural selection in the morphology and performance of a lizard. Oecologia 153: 489499.
  • Irschick, D.J., Ramos, M., Buckley, C., Elstrott, J., Carlisle, E., Lailvaux, S.P., Bloch, N., Herrel, A. & Vanhooydonck, B. 2006. Are morphology-performance relationships invariant across different seasons? A test with the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Oikos 114: 4959.
  • Irschick, D.J., Meyers, J.J., Husak, J.F. & Le Galliard, J.-F. 2008. How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10: 177196.
  • Kitano, J., Mori, S. & Peichel, C.L. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the external morphology of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Copeia 2007: 336349.
  • Koehl, M.A.R. 1996. When does morphology matter? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 501542.
  • Langerhans, R.B. 2009a. Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 48: 750758.
  • Langerhans, R.B. 2009b. Morphology, performance, fitness: functional insight into a post-Pleistocene radiation of mosquitofish. Biol. Lett. 5: 488491.
  • Langerhans, R.B. 2009c. Trade-off between steady and unsteady swimming underlies predator-driven divergence in Gambusia affinis. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 10571075.
  • Langerhans, R.B. & Reznick, D.N. 2009. Ecology and evolution of swimming performance in fishes: predicting evolution with biomechanics. In: Fish Locomotion: An Etho-ecological Perspective (P.Domenici & B.G.Kapoor, eds), pp. 200248. Science Publishers, Enfield.
  • Langerhans, R.B., Layman, C.A., Shokrollahi, A.M. & DeWitt, T.J. 2004. Predator-driven phentoypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58: 23052318.
  • Lavin, P.A. & McPhail, J.D. 1993. Parapatric lake and stream sticklebacks on northern Vancouver Island: disjunct distribution or parallel evolution? Can. J. Zool. 71: 1117.
  • Law, T.C. & Blake, R.W. 1996. Comparison of the fast-start performances of closely related morphologically distinct threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus spp.). J. Exp. Biol. 199: 25952604.
  • McGuigan, K., Franklin, C.E., Moritz, C. & Blows, M.W. 2003. Adaptation of rainbow fish to lake and stream habitats. Evolution 57: 104118.
  • Moore, J.-S. & Hendry, A.P. 2005. Both selection and gene flow are necessary to explain adaptive divergence: evidence from clinal variation in stream stickleback. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7: 871886.
  • Moore, J.-S., Gow, J.L., Taylor, E.B. & Hendry, A.P. 2007. Quantifying the constraining influence of gene flow on adaptive divergence in the lake-stream threespine stickleback system. Evolution 61: 20152026.
  • van Noordwijk, A.J. & de Jong, G. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 128: 137142.
  • Plaut, I. 2000a. Effects of fin size on swimming performance, swimming behaviour and routine activity of zebrafish Danio rerio. J. Exp. Biol. 203: 813820.
  • Plaut, I. 2000b. Resting metabolic rate, critical swimming speed, and routine activity of the euryhaline cyprinodontid, Aphanius dispar, acclimated to wide range of salinities. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73: 590596.
  • Plaut, I. 2001. Critical swimming speed: its ecological relevance. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 131: 4150.
  • Raeymaekers, J.A.M., Delaire, L. & Hendry, A.P. 2009. Genetically-based differences in nest characteristics between lake, inlet, and hybrid threespine stickleback from the Misty system, British Columbia, Canada. Evol. Ecol. Res. 11: 905919.
  • Reimchen, T.E. 1994. Predators and morphological evolution in threespine stickleback. In: The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (M.A.Bell & S.A.Foster, eds), pp. 240276. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  • Schaarschmidt, Th. & Jürss, K. 2003. Locomotory capacity of Baltic Sea and freshwater populations of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 135: 411424.
  • Sharpe, D.M.T., Räsänen, K., Berner, D. & Hendry, A.P. 2009. Genetic and environmental contributions to the morphology of lake and stream stickleback: implications for gene flow and reproductive isolation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10: 849866.
  • Swain, D.P. 1992. The functional basis of natural selection for vertebral traits of larvae in the stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Evolution 46: 987997.
  • Taylor, E.B. & McPhail, J.D. 1986. Prolonged and burst swimming in anadromous and freshwater threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Can. J. Zool. 64: 416420.
  • Thompson, C.E., Taylor, E.B. & McPhail, J.D. 1997. Parallel evolution of lake-stream pairs of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) inferred from mitochondrial DNA variation. Evolution 51: 19551965.
  • Tudorache, C., Blust, R. & De Boeck, G. 2007. Swimming capacity and energetics of migrating and non-migrating morphs of three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. and their ecological implications. J. Fish Biol. 71: 14481456.
  • Van Damme, R., Entin, P., Vanhooydonck, B. & Herrel, A. 2008. Causes of sexual dimorphism in performance traits: a comparative approach. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10: 229250.
  • Walker, J.A. 1997. Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 350.
  • Walker, J.A. 2002. Functional morphology and virtual models: physical constraints on the design of oscillating wings, fins, legs, and feet at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42: 232242.
  • Walker, J.A. 2004. Dynamics of pectoral fin rowing in a fish with an extreme rowing stroke: the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Exp. Biol. 207: 19251939.
  • Walker, J.A. 2007. A general model of functional constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 170: 681689.
  • Walker, J.A. 2010. An integrative model of evolutionary covariance: a symposium on body shape in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol., doi: 10.1093/icb/icq014.
  • Walker, J.A. & Westneat, M.W. 2002. Performance limits of labriform propulsion and correlates with fin shape and motion. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 177187.
  • Walker, J.A., Ghalambor, C.K., Griset, O.L., McKenney, D. & Reznick, D.N. 2005. Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Funct. Ecol. 19: 808815.
  • Warner, D.A. & Shine, R. 2006. Morphological variation does not influence locomotor performance within a cohort of hatching lizards (Amphibolurus muricatus, Agamidae). Oikos 114: 126134.
  • Webb, P.W. 1982. Locomotor patterns in the evolution of actinopterygian fishes. Am. Zool. 22: 329342.
  • Webb, P.W. 1984. Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Am. Zool. 24: 107120.