SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahlén, I. 1995. An isolated population of Metrioptera roeseli Hagenbach 1822 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) on the south coast of Sweden. Entomol. Tidssk. 116: 187188.
  • Alleaume-Benharira, M., Pen, I.R. & Ronce, O. 2006. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species’ range: interactions between drift and gene flow. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 203215.
  • Angilletta, J.M.J. & Dunham, A.E. 2003. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat. 162: 332342.
  • Arnett, A.E. & Gotelli, N.J. 1999. Geographic variation in life-history traits of the ant lion, Myrmeleon immaculatus: evolutionary implications of Bergmann’s rule. Evolution 53: 11801188.
  • Atkinson, D. & Sibly, R.M. 1997. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 235239.
  • Atkinson, D., Begon, M. & Fitter, A.H. 1994 Temperature and organism size – a biological law for ectotherms? In: Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 25 (M.Begon & A.H. Fitter, eds), pp. 158. Academic Press, Oxford.
  • Barton, N. 2001 Adaptation at the edge of a species′ range. In: Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context (J.Silvertown & J.Antonovics, eds), pp. 365392. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Bavnhoj, H. 1996. Nye fund af lovgraeshoppen Metrioptera roeseli (Hagenbach) i Danmark. Flora og Fauna 101: 6164.
  • Begin, M. & Roff, D.A. 2004. The common quantitative genetic basis of wing morphology and diapause occurrence in the cricket Gryllus veletis. Heredity 89: 473479.
  • Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. & Bonhomme, F. 2001. GENETIX 4.02 logiciel sous windows TM pour la Génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier.
  • Bellmann, H. 1985. Heuschrecken, beobachten, bestimmen. J Neumann – Neudamm GmbH, Melsungen, Germany.
  • Berggren, Å. 2001. Colonization success in Roesel′s bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli: the effects of propagule size. Ecology 82: 274280.
  • Besold, J., Schmitt, T., Tammaru, T. & Cassel-Lundhagen, A. 2008. Strong genetic impoverishment from the centre of distribution in southern Europe to peripheral Baltic and isolated Scandinavian populations. J. Biogeogr. 35: 20902101.
  • Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J. & Loder, N. 1999. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers. Distrib. 5: 165174.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Demont, M. 2004. Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr. Comp. Biol. 44: 413424.
  • Bolnick, D.I. & Nosil, P. 2007. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 61: 22292243.
  • Bridle, J.R. & Vines, T.H. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 140147.
  • Bridle, J.R., Polechová, J., Kawata, M. & Butlin, R.K. 2010. Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations. Ecol. Lett. 13: 485494.
  • Burnham, K. & Anderson, D. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. Springer, New York, USA.
  • Carroll, S.P., Hendry, A.P., Reznick, D.N. & Fox, C.W. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct. Ecol. 21: 387393.
  • Cassel-Lundhagen, A. 2010 Peripheral relict populations of widespread species evolutionary hotspots or just more of the same?. In: Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology (J.C.Habel & T.Assmann, eds), pp. 267275. Springer, Berlin.
  • Cassel-Lundhagen, A., Tammaru, T., Windig, J., Ryrholm, N. & Nylin, S. 2009. Are peripheral populations special? Congruent patterns in two butterfly species. Ecography 32: 591600.
  • Chapuis, M. & Estoup, A. 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 621631.
  • Chown, S. & Gaston, K. 2010. Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol. Rev. 85: 139169.
  • Ciplak, B., Sirin, D., Taylan, M.S. & Kaya, S. 2008. Altitudinal size clines, species richness and population density: case studies in Orthoptera. J. Orthop. Res. 17: 157163.
  • Cushman, J.H., Lawton, J.H. & Manly, B.F.J. 1993. Latitudinal patterns in European ant assemblages: variation in species richness and body size. Oecologia 95: 3037.
  • Danner, B.J. & Joern, A. 2003. Resource-mediated impact of spider predation risk on performance in the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 137: 352359.
  • Danner, B.J. & Joern, A. 2004. Development, growth, and egg production of Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in response to spider predation risk and elevated resource quality. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 111.
  • Danyk, T., Mackauer, M. & Johnson, D.L. 2005. The influence of host suitability on the range of grasshopper species utilized by Blaesoxipha atlanis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in the field. Bull. Entomol. Res. 95: 571578.
  • David, J., Legout, H. & Moreteau, B. 2006. Phenotypic plasticity of body size in a temperate population of Drosophila melanogaster: when the temperature—size rule does not apply. J. Genet. 85: 923.
  • De Block, M., Slos, S., Johansson, F. & Stoks, R. 2008. Integrating life history and physiology to understand latitudinal size variation in a damselfly. Ecography 31: 115123.
  • Demont, M., Blanckenhorn, W.U., Hosken, D.J. & Garner, T.W.J. 2008. Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation across Europe in yellow dung flies. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 14921503.
  • Farwig, N., Bailey, D., Bochud, E., Herrmann, J., Kindler, E., Reusser, N., Schuepp, C. & Schmidt-Entling, M. 2009. Isolation from forest reduces pollination, seed predation and insect scavenging in Swiss farmland. Landscape Ecol. 24: 919927.
  • Frankham, R. 2004. Resolving the genetic paradox in invasive species. Heredity 94: 385.
  • Frankham, R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126: 131140.
  • Garant, D., Forde, S. & Hendry, A. 2007. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct. Ecol. 21: 434443.
  • Garcia-Ramos, G. & Kirkpatrick, M. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51: 2128.
  • Gienapp, P., Teplitsky, C., Alho, J.S., Mills, J.A. & Merila, J. 2008. Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol. Ecol. 17: 167178.
  • Gillespie, R.G. & Roderick, G.K. 2002. Arthropods on islands: colonization, speciation, and conservation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 595632.
  • Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485486.
  • Harz, K. 1957. Die Geradfliigler Mitteleuropas, pp. 1494. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.
  • Hassall, M., Walters, R.J., Telfer, M. & Hassall, R.J. 2006. Why does a grasshopper have fewer, larger offspring at its range limits? J. Evol. Biol. 19: 267276.
  • van der Have, T.M. & de Jong, G. 1996. Adult size in ectotherms: temperature effects on growth and differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 183: 329340.
  • Ho, C.-K., Pennings, S. & Carefoot, T. 2010. Is diet quality an overlooked mechanism for Bergmann′s rule? Am. Nat. 175: 269276.
  • Hochkirch, A. & Damerau, M. 2009. Rapid range expansion of a wing-dimorphic bush-cricket after the 2003 climatic anomaly. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 97: 118127.
  • Hoffmann, A.A., Ratna, E., SgrÒ, C.M., Barton, M., Blacket, M., Hallas, R., De Garis, S. & Weeks, A.R. 2007. Antagonistic selection between adult thorax and wing size in field released Drosophila melanogaster independent of thermal conditions. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 22192227.
  • Huey, R.B., Gilchrist, G.W., Carlson, M.L., Berrigan, D. & Serra, L. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287: 308309.
  • Hufbauer, R.A. 2008. Biological invasions: paradox lost and paradise gained. Curr. Biol. 18: R246R247.
  • Ingrisch 1986. The purennial life of the European Tettigoniidae (Insecta: Orthoptera), 1 the effect of temperature in embryonic development and hatching. Oecologia 70: 606616.
  • James, F.C. 1970. Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51: 365–390.
  • de Jong, J. & Kindvall, O. 1991. Cikadavårtbitaren Metrioptera roeseli– nykomling eller hotad relikt? (The Roesel’s bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli– new in Sweden or a threatened relict species?). Fauna och Flora 86: 86.
  • Kaňuch, P., Pfunder, M., Berggren, Å. & Cassel-Lundhagen, A. 2010. Description of nine new microsatellite loci in Metrioptera roeselii (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) and their multiplex PCR protocols. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10: 404408.
  • Kawecki, T.J. 2000. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Bio. Sci. 267: 13151320.
  • Kawecki, T.J. 2008. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 321342.
  • Kawecki, T. & Ebert, D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 12251241.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N.H. 1997. Evolution of a species’ range. Am. Nat. 150: 123.
  • Leinonen, T., O’Hara, R.B., Cano, J.M. & Merilä, J. 2008. Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 117.
  • Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 183189.
  • Maas, S., Detzel, P. & Staudt, A. 2002. Gefährdungsanalyse der Heuschrecken Deutschlands Verbreitungsatlas, Gefährdungseinstufung und Schutzkonzepte. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn–Bad Godesberg.
  • Macdonald, D.W. & Johnson, D.D.P. 2001. Dispersal in theory and practice: consequences for conservation biology. In: Dispersal (J.Clobert, E.Danchin, A.A.Dhondt & J.D.Nichols, eds), pp. 359372. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209220.
  • Marshall, J. & Haes, E. 1988. Grasshoppers and Allied Insects of Great Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, Martins, Great Horkesley, Colchester, Essex, UK.
  • McKechnie, S.W., Blacket, M.J., Song, S.V., Rako, L., Carroll, X., Johnson, T.K., Jensen, L.T., Lee, S.F., Wee, C.W. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2010. A clinally varying promoter polymorphism associated with adaptive variation in wing size in Drosophila. Mol. Ecol. 19: 775784.
  • Mousseau, T. 1997. Ectoterms follow the converse to Bergmann’s Rule. Evolution 51: 630632.
  • Nylin, S. & Svärd, L. 1991. Latitudinal patterns in the size of european butterflies. Holarct. Ecol. 14: 192202.
  • van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W., Wills, D. & Shipley, P. 2004. Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 535538.
  • Partridge, L. & Coyne, J.A. 1997. Bergmann’s rule in ectotherms: is it adaptive? Evolution 51: 632635.
  • Perez, J.E., Alfonsi, C., Nirchio, M. & Barrios, J. 2006. The inbreeding paradox in invasive species. Interciencia 31: 544546.
  • Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. & Goldstein, H. 2009. A User’s Guide to MLwiN. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  • Rice, S.H. & Papadopoulos, A. 2009. Evolution with stochastic fitness and stochastic migration. PLoS ONE 4: e7130.
  • Roff, D. 1980. Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the ‘ups and downs’ of clinal variation. Oecologia 45: 202208.
  • Roff, D.A. 1997. Directional selection. In: Evolutionary Quantitative Genetic, pp. 118163. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Ronce, O. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2001. When sources become sinks: migrational metdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55: 15201531.
  • Rousset, F. 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 12191228.
  • Rousset, F. 2008. genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8: 103106.
  • Stillwell, R.C. 2010. Are latitudinal clines in body size adaptive? Oikos 119: 13871390.
  • Stillwell, R.C. & Fox, C.W. 2009. Geographic variation in body size, sexual size dimorphism and fitness components of a seed beetle: local adaptation versus phenotypic plasticity. Oikos 118: 703712.
  • Stillwell, R.C., Morse, G.E. & Fox, C.W. 2007. Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle. Am. Nat. 170: 358369.
  • Terribile, L.C., Olalla-Tarraga, M.A., Diniz, J.A.F. & Rodriguez, M.A. 2009. Ecological and evolutionary components of body size: geographic variation of venomous snakes at the global scale. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 94109.
  • Unsicker, S.B., Oswald, A., Köhler, G. & Weisser, W.W. 2008. Complementarity effects through dietary mixing enhance the performance of a generalist insect herbivore. Oecologia 156: 313324.
  • Vickery, V.R. 1965. Factors governing the distribution and dispersal of the recently introduced grasshopper, Metrioptera roeseli (Hgb.) (Orthoptera: Ensifera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Québec 10: 165171.
  • van Voorhies, W. 1996. Bergmann size clines: a simple explanation for their occurrence in ectotherms. Evolution 50: 12591264.
  • Vrijenhoek, R.C. 1994. Genetic diversity and fitness in small populations. In: Conservation Genetics (V.Loeshcke, J.Tomiuk & S.K.Jain, eds), pp. 3753. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
  • Vucetich, J.A. & Waite, T.A. 2003. Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species’ range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 4: 639645.
  • Walsh, S., Metzger, D. & Higuchi, R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10: 506513.
  • Whitlock, M. 2001. Dispersal and the genetic properties of metapopulations. In: Dispersal (J.Clobert, E.Danchin, A.Dhondt & J.D.Nichols, eds), pp. 273282. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Whitman, D.W. 2008. The significance of body size in the Orthoptera: a review. J. Orthop. Res. 17: 117134.
  • Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 433458.
  • Winterhalter, W.E. & Mousseau, T.A. 2008. The strength of temperature-mediated selection on body size in a wild insect population. J. Orthop. Res. 17: 347351.