SHORT COMMUNICATION
Using creation science to demonstrate evolution? Senter’s strategy revisited
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02208.x
© 2011 The Author. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Additional Information
How to Cite
WOOD, T. C. (2011), Using creation science to demonstrate evolution? Senter’s strategy revisited. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24: 914–918. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02208.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2011
- Received 12 October 2010; revised 12 November 2010; accepted 18 November 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Archaeopteryx;
- baraminology;
- classic multidimensional scaling;
- coelurosauria;
- creationism;
- creation science;
- Theropoda
Abstract
Senter’s strategy of arguing against creationism using their own methodology focused on demonstrating a morphological continuum between birds and nonavian dinosaurs using classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS), a method used by some creationists to assign species to assist in the detection of phylogenetic ‘discontinuities.’ Because creationists do not typically use CMDS in the manner Senter used it, his results were re-examined using ‘distance correlation,’ a method used to assign species to ‘created kinds.’ Distance correlation using Senter’s set of taxa and characters supports his conclusion of morphological continuity, but other sets of taxa with more characters do not. These results lessen the potential impact that Senter’s strategy might have on creationism; however, it is possible that future fossil discoveries will provide stronger support for morphological continuity between dinosaurs and birds.

1420-9101/asset/JEB_left.gif?v=1&s=cdd0a87e0640cdbe1b969dbbd029d612b7a1748a)
1420-9101/asset/JEB_right.gif?v=1&s=1566ac71d957297ac097f5a646bcb0098128b801)
