SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alicchio, R. & Palenzona, D.L. 1971. Changes of sexual dimorphism values in Drosophila melanogaster. Boll. Zool. 38: 7584.
  • Badyaev, A.V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 369378.
  • Badyaev, A.V. & Martin, T.E. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in relation to current selection in the house finch. Evolution 54: 987997.
  • Bedhomme, S. & Chippindale, A.K. 2007. Irreconcilable differences: when sexual dimorphism fails to resolve sexual conflict. In: Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies Of Sexual Size Dimorphism (D.J.Fairbairn, W.U.Blanckenhorn & T.Székely, eds), pp. 185194. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Blanckenhorn, W.U., Dixon, A.F.G., Fairbairn, D.J., Foellmer, M.W., Gilbert, P., van der Linde, K. et al. 2007. Proximate causes of Rensch’s rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? Am. Nat. 169: 245257.
  • Chippindale, A.K., Gibson, J.R. & Rice, W.R. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. PNAS 98: 16711675.
  • Conner, J.K. & Hartl, D.L. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, Masschusetts USA.
  • Conner, J. & Via, S. 1992. Natural selection on body size in Tribolium: possible genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Heredity 69: 7383.
  • Cortese, M.D., Norry, F.M., Piccinali, R. & Hasson, E. 2002. Direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on developmental time and wing length in Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 56: 25412547.
  • Cox, R.M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173: 176187.
  • Davidowitz, G., Roff, D.A. & Nijhout, H.F. 2005. A physiological perspective on the response of body size and development time to simultaneous directional selection. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 525531.
  • Delph, L.F., Gehring, J.L., Frey, F.M., Artnz, A.M. & Levri, M. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58: 19361946.
  • Englert, D.C. & Bell, A.E. 1969. Components of growth in genetically diverse populations of Tribolium castaneum. Can. J. Cenet. Cytol. 11: 896907.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 659687.
  • Fairbairn, D.J. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis: a case study of adaptation in response to sexually antagonistic selection. In: Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (D.J.Fairbairn, W.U.Blanckenhorn & T.Székely, eds), pp. 97105. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Fairbairn, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Székely, T. eds. 2007. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex, England.
  • Fox, C.W., Stillwell, R.C. & Moya-Laraño, J. 2007. Variation in selection, phenotypic plasticity, and the ecology of sexual size dimorphism in two seed-feeding beetles. In: Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (D.J.Fairbairn, W.U.Blanckenhorn & T.Székely, eds), pp. 8896. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Gotthard, K., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 1994. Adaptive variation in growth rate-life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecologia 99: 281289.
  • Hedrick, A.V. & Temeles, E.J. 1989. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 136138.
  • Howe, R.W. 1968. A further consideration of the heterogeneity of the developmental period of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Col., Tenebrionidae) in constant environmental conditions. J. Stored Prod. Res. 4: 221231.
  • Koncagül, S. & Berger, P.J. 2006. Response to selection for increased pupa weight in Tribolium castaneum in different environments. J. Agric. Fac. 10: 110.
  • Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292305.
  • Lande, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (J.W.Bradbury & M.B.Andersson, eds), pp. 8394. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  • Mank, J.E. 2009. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: lessons from the genome. Am. Nat. 173: 141150.
  • McDaniel, S.F. 2005. Genetic correlations do not constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Moss Ceratodon purpureus. Evolution 59: 23532361.
  • Meagher, T.R. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophullaceae). I. Genetic Variation. Evolution 46: 445457.
  • Messina, F.J. 2004. Predictable modification of body size and competitive ability following a host shift by a seed beetle. Evolution 58: 27882797.
  • Nijhout, H.F., Davidowitz, G. & Roff, D.A. 2006. A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta. J. Biol. 5: 16.
  • Nijhout, H.F., Roff, D.A. & Davidowitz, G. 2010. Conflicting processes in the evolution of body size and development time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 567575.
  • Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1993. Responses and correlated responses to artificial selection on thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 47: 213226.
  • Partridge, L., Langelan, R., Fowler, K., Zwaan, B. & French, V. 1999. Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 74: 4354.
  • Poissant, J., Wilson, A.J. & Coltman, D.W. 2010. Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlation. Evolution 64: 97107.
  • Preziosi, R.F. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2000. Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 54: 558566.
  • Reeve, J.P. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on body size: an empirical test of the quantitative genetic model. Evolution 50: 19271938.
  • Reeve, J.P. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2001. Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 244254.
  • Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Roff, D.A. 2000. Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 434445.
  • Rolff, J., Armitage, S.A.O. & Coltman, D.W. 2005. Genetic constraints and sexual dimorphism in immune defense. Evolution 59: 18441850.
  • Shingleton, A.W., Frankino, W.A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H.F. & Emlen, D.J. 2007. Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. Bioessays 29: 536548.
  • Sokoloff, A. 1977. The Biology of Tribolium, Vol. 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Stillwell, R.C. & Davidowitz, G. 2010. A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth. Proc. R. Soc. B 277: 20692074.
  • Stillwell, R.C., Blanckenhorn, W.U., Teder, T., Davidowitz, G. & Fox, C.W. 2010. Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity of body size affects variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55: 227245.
  • Teuschl, Y., Reim, C. & Blanckenhorn, W.U. 2007. Correlated responses to artificial body size selection in growth, development, phenotypic plasticity and juvenile viability in yellow dung flies. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 87103.
  • Via, S. & Conner, J. 1995. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: genetic variability within and across different grains in Tribolium castaneum. Heredity 74: 8090.
  • Wilkinson, G.S. 1993. Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. Camb. 62: 213222.
  • Zeleny, C. 1921. Decrease in sexual dimorphism of bar-eye Drosophila during the course of selection for low and high facet number. Am. Nat. 55: 404411.