SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Altwegg, R. & Reyer, H.U. 2003. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57: 872882.
  • APHA 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
  • Berven, K.A. 2009. Density-dependence at the terrestrial stage of wood frogs: evidence form a 21-year population study. Copeia 2009: 328338.
  • Boatright-Horowitz, S.S. & Simmons, A.M. 1997. Transient “deafness” accompanies auditory development during metamorphosis from tadpole to frog. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1487714882.
  • Brockelman, W.Y. 1969. An analysis of density effects and predation in Bufo americanus tadpoles. Ecology 50: 632644.
  • Brönmark, C. & Miner, J.G. 1992. Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258: 13481350.
  • Burggren, W.W. & Just, J.J. 1992. Developmental changes in physiological systems. In: Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians (M.E.Feder & W.W.Burggren, eds), pp. 467531. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Burns, J.G. & Rodd, H. 2008. Hastiness, brain size and predation regime affect the performance of wild guppies in a spatial memory task. Anim. Behav. 76: 911922.
  • Caldwell, J.P., Thorp, J.H. & Jervey, T.O. 1980. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46: 285289.
  • Dmitriew, C.M. 2011. The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate? Biol. Rev. 86: 97116.
  • Fisher, M.O., Nager, R.G. & Monaghan, P. 2006. Compensatory growth impairs adult cognitive performance. PLoS Biol. 4: 14621466.
  • Fritzsch, B., Nikundiwe, A.M. & Will, U. 1984. Projection patterns of lateral-line afferents in anurans: a comparative HRP study. J. Comp. Neurol. 229: 451469.
  • Gimenez, L. 2010. Relationships between habitat conditions, larval traits, and juvenile performance in a marine invertebrate. Ecology 91: 14011413.
  • Gomez-Mestre, I., Saccocio, V.L., Iijima, T., Collinds, E.M., Rosenthal, G.G. & Warkentin, K.M. 2010. The shape of things to come: linking developmental plasticity to post-metamorphic morphology in anurans. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 13641373.
  • Gonda, A., Herczeg, G. & Merilä, J. 2009. Habitat-dependent and -independent plastic responses to social environment in the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) brain. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 20852092.
  • Gonda, A., Trokovic, N., Herczeg, G., Laurila, A. & Merilä, J. 2010. Predation- and competition-mediated brain plasticity in Rana temporaria tadpoles. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 23002308.
  • Gosner, K.L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183190.
  • Hagman, M., Hayes, R.A., Capon, R.J. & Shine, R. 2009. Alarm cues experienced by cane toad tadpoles affect post-metamorphic morphology and chemical defences. Funct. Ecol. 23: 126132.
  • Harper, E.B. & Semlitsch, R.D. 2007. Density-dependence in the terrestrial life history stage of two anurans. Oecologia 153: 879889.
  • Hettyey, A., Vincze, K., Zsarnóczai, S., Hoi, H. & Laurila, A. 2011. Costs and benefits of defenses induced by predators differing in dangerousness. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 10071019.
  • Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H.G. & Gage, F.H. 1997. Genetic influence on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1040910414.
  • Kihslinger, R.L. & Nevitt, G.A. 2006. Early rearing environment impacts cerebellar growth in juvenile salmon. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 504509.
  • Kotrschal, K., van Staaden, M.J. & Huber, R. 1998. Fish brains: evolution and ecological relationships. J. Fish. Biol. Fish. 8: 136.
  • Lannoo, M.J. 1999. Integration: nervous and sensory systems. In: Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae (R.W.McDiarmid & R.Altig, eds), pp. 149169. The University of Chicago press, Chicago.
  • Laurila, A. 1998. Breeding habitat selection and larval performance of two anurans in freshwater rock-pools. Ecography 21: 484494.
  • Lisney, T.J., Bennett, M.B. & Collin, S.P. 2007. Volumetric analysis of brain areas indicates a shift in sensory orientation during development in the deep-sea grenadier Coryphaenoides armatus. Raffles Bull. Zool. 14: 715.
  • Miner, B.G., Sultan, S.E., Morgan, S.G., Padilla, D.K. & Relyea, R.A. 2005. Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 685692.
  • Mohammed, A.H., Zhu, S.W., Darmopil, S., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Ernfors, P., Winblad, B. et al. 2002. Environmental enrichment and the brain. Prog. Brain Res. 138: 109133.
  • Northcutt, R.G., Neary, T.J. & Senn, D.G. 1978. Observations on the brain of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae: external anatomy and quantitative analysis. J. Morphol. 155: 181192.
  • Padilla, D.K. 1998. Inducible phenotypic plasticity of the radula in Lacuna (Gastropoda : Littorinidae). Veliger 41: 201204.
  • Pechenik, J.A. 2006. Larval experience and latent effects – metamorphosis is not a new beginning. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46: 323333.
  • Relyea, R.A. 2003. Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology 84: 18401848.
  • Relyea, R.A. 2007. Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia 152: 389400.
  • Relyea, R.A. & Hoverman, J.T. 2003. The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs. Oecologia 134: 596604.
  • Schlichting, C.D. & Pigliucci, M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Semlitsch, R.D., Scott, D.C. & Pechmann, J.H.K. 1988. Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69: 184192.
  • Soares, D., Yamamoto, Y., Strickler, A.G. & Jeffery, W.R. 2004. The lens has a specific influence on optic nerve and tectum development in the blind cavefish Astyanax. Dev. Neurosci. 26: 308317.
  • Taylor, G.M., Nol, E. & Boire, D. 1995. Brain regions and encephalization in anurans: adaptation or stability? Brain Behav. Evol. 45: 96109.
  • Tejedo, M., Marangoni, F., Pertoldi, C., Richter-Boix, A., Laurila, A., Orizaola, G. et al. 2010. Contrasting effects of environmental factors during larval stage on morphological plasticity in post-metamorphic frogs. Climate Res. 43: 3139.
  • Templin, T. & Simmons, A.M. 2005. Cellular and spatial changes in the anuran superior olive across metamorphosis. Hear. Res. 207: 8798.
  • Van Buskirk, J. 2002. Phenotypic lability and the evolution of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles. Evolution 56: 361370.
  • Van Praag, H., Kempermann, G. & Cage, F.H. 2000. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1: 191198.
  • Wilczynski, W. 1992. The nervous system. In: Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians (M.E.Feder & W.W.Burggren, eds), pp. 939. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Wilson, A.D.M. & McLaughlin, R.L. 2010. Foraging behaviour and brain morphology in recently emerged brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 19051914.