SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, D.C., Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D.E. 2004. Geometrics morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ′revolution′. Ital. J. Zool. 71: 516.
  • Álvarez, A., Perez, S.I. & Verzi, D.H. 2011. Ecological and phylogenetical influences on mandible shape variation of South American caviomorph rodents (Rodentia: Hystricomorpha). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 102: 828837.
  • Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 171745.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1: 225243.
  • Cardini, A. & Elton, S. 2008. Does the skull carry a phylogenetic signal? Evolution and modularity in the guenons. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 813834.
  • Cardini, A., Diniz Filho, J.A.F., Polly, P.D. & Elton, S. 2010. Biogeographic analysis using geometric morphometrics: clines in skull size and shape in a widespread African arboreal monkey. In: Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians (A.M.T.Elewa, ed.). Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 124, Springer-Verlag Publishers, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Delson, E. & Rosenberger, A.L. 1984. Are there any anthropoid primate “living fossils”? In: Casebook on Living Fossils (N.Eldredge & S.Stanley, eds), pp. 5061. Fischer Publishers, New York.
  • Drake, A.G. & Klingenberg, C.P. 2008. The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275: 7176.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 115.
  • Fleagle, J.G. 1999. Primate Adaptation and Evolution, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.
  • Ford, S.M. & Davis, L.C. 1992. Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 88: 415468.
  • Gavrilets, S. & Losos, J.B. 2009. Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data. Science 323: 732737.
  • Glor, R.E. 2010. Phylogenetic approaches to the study of adaptive radiation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41: 251270.
  • Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P. & Bookstein, F.L. 2005. Semi-landmarks in three dimensions. In: Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (D.E.Slice, ed), pp. 7398. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
  • Hall, B.K. 2003. Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol. Philos. 18: 219247.
  • Hall, T. 2004. BioEdit 7.0.0. Available at: http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html.
  • Hartwig, W.C. 1996. Perinatal life history traits in New World monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 40: 99130.
  • Hodgson, J.A., Sterner, K.N., Matthews, L.J., Burrell, A., Jani, R.A., Raaum, R.L. et al. 2009. Successive radiations, not stasis, in the South American primate fauna. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 55345539.
  • Kay, R.F., Fleagle, J.G., Mitchell, T.R.T., Colbert, M., Bown, T. & Powers, D.W. 2008. The anatomy of Dolichocebus gaimaneensis, a stem platyrrhine monkey from Argentina. J. Hum. Evol. 54: 323382.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11: 353357.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. & Gidaszewski, N.A. 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59: 245261.
  • Lemey, M., Salemi, M. & Vandamme, A.-M. 2009. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Losos, J.B. & Mahler, D.L. 2010. Adaptive radiation: the interaction of ecological opportunity, adaptation, and speciation. In: Evolution Since Darwin: The First 150 Years (M.A.Bell, D.J.Futuyma, W.F.Eanes & J.S.Levinton, eds), pp. 381420. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Marroig, G. 2007. When size makes a difference: allometry, life-history and morphological evolution of capuchins (Cebus) and squirrels (Saimiri) monkeys (Cebinae, Platyrrhini). BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 20.
  • Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J.M. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World monkeys. Evolution 55: 25762600.
  • Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J.M. 2005. Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution 59: 11281142.
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646667.
  • Materson, T.J. & Hartwig, W.C. 1998. Degrees of sexual dimorphism in Cebus and other New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107: 243256.
  • Mitteroecker, P. & Gunz, P. 2009. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol. Biol. 36: 235247.
  • Norconk, M.A., Wright, B.W., Conklin-Brittain, N.L. & Vinyard, C.J. 2009. Mechanical and nutritional properties of food as factors in Platyrrhine dietary adaptations. In: South American Primates, Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (P.A.Garber, A.Estrada, J.C.Bicca-Marques, E.W.Heymann & K.B.Strier, eds), pp. 279319. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • O’Higgins, P. & Jones, N. 2009. Morphologika, v2.5. Tools for Shape Analysis. University College London, London, UK.
  • Opazo, J.C., Wildman, D.E., Prychitko, T., Johnson, R.M. & Goodman, M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times among New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Primates). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40: 274280.
  • Oxnard, C.E. & O’Higgins, P. 2009. Biology clearly needs morphometrics. Does morphometrics need biology? Biol. Theory 4: 8497.
  • Paradis, E. 2006. Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R. Springer, New York.
  • Perez, S.I., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Rohlf, F.J. & dos Reis, S.F. 2009. Ecological and evolutionary factors in the morphological diversification of South American spiny rats. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98: 646660.
  • Polly, P.D. 2001. On morphological clocks and paleophylogeography: towards a timescale for Sorex hybrid zones. Genetica 112–113: 339357.
  • Polly, P.D. 2008. Developmental dynamics and G-matrices: can morphometric spaces be used to model phenotypic evolution? Evol. Biol. 35: 8396.
  • Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 12531256.
  • R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
  • Ray, D.A., Xing, J., Hedges, D.J., Hall, M.A., Laborde, M.E., Anders, B.A. et al. 2005. Alu insertion loci and platyrrhine primate phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35: 117126.
  • Reddy, D., Harvati, K. & Kim, J. 2005. An alternative approach to space curve analysis using the example of the Neanderthal occipital bun. In: Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (D.E.Slice, ed.), pp. 99115. Kluwer, New York.
  • Revell, L.J., Harmon, L.J. & Collar, D.C. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57: 591601.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 21432160.
  • Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D.E. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 4059.
  • Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.
  • Rosenberger, A.L. 2002. Platyrrhine paleontology and systematics: the paradigm shifts. In: The Primate Fossil Record (W.C.Hartwig, ed.), pp. 151160. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Rosenberger, A.L. 2010. Platyrrhines, PAUP, parallelism, and the Long Lineage Hypothesis: a reply to Kay et al. (2008). J. Hum. Evol. 59: 214217.
  • Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Smith, R.J. & Jungers, W.L. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. J. Human Evol. 32: 523559.
  • Swiderski, D.L. 2003. Separating size from allometry: analysis of lower jaw morphology in the Fox Squirrel, Sciurus niger. J. Mammal. 84: 861876.
  • Tejedor, M.F. 2008. The origin and evolution of Neotropical Primates. Arq. Mus. Nac. 66: 251269.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2009. Estimating rates and patterns of morphological evolution from phylogenies: lessons in limb lability from Australian Lerista lizards. J. Biol. 8: 19.
  • Wiens, J.J., Ackerly, D.D., Allen, A.P., Anacker, B.L., Buckley, L.B., Cornell, H.V. et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Lett. 13: 13101324.
  • Wildman, D.E., Jameson, N.M., Opazo, J.C. & Yi, S.V. 2009. A fully resolved genus level phylogeny of neotropical primates (Platyrrhini). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53: 694702.
  • Wiley, D.F., Amenta, N., Alcantara, D.A., Ghosh, D., Kil, Y.J., Delson, E. et al. 2005. Evolutionary morphing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization 2005 (VIS ‘05), pp. 431438. Minneapolis, MN.
  • Williams, S.E. & Slice, D.E. 2010. Regional shape change in adult facial bone curvature with age. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 143: 437447.
  • Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  • Zelditch, M.L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D. & Fink, W.L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, London.