SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alcock, J. 1994. Post-insemination association between males and females in insects: the mate guarding hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 121.
  • Alexander, R.D., Marshall, D.C. & Cooley, J.R. 1997. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J.C.Choe & B.J.Crespi, eds), pp. 4. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
  • Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784786.
  • Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Bateman, P.W. & Ferguson, J.W.H. 2004. Male mate choice and spermatophore size in the Botswana armoured ground cricket Acanthoplus discoidalis. Can, and how, do males judge female mating history? J. Zool. Lond. 262: 305309.
  • Beier, M. 1955. Ordnung: Saltatoptera M. (Saltatoria Latreille, 1817). Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs 6: 34304.
  • Beier, M. 1972. Ordnung Saltatoria (Grillen und Heuschrecken). Kükenthal’s Handb. Zool. (Ed. 2) 4: 2217.
  • Boldyrev, B.T. 1928. Biological studies on Bradyporus multituberculatus F.W. (Orth., Tettig.). Eos 4: 1356.
  • Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76: 305339.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
  • Dixson, A.F. 1995. Baculum length and copulatory behaviour in carnivores and pinnipeds (grand order Ferae). J. Zool. 235: 6776.
  • Duijm, M., Oudman, L. & Veldstra, B.G. 1983. Copulation in Ephippiger (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea). Tijdschr. Entomol. 126: 9196.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2010. Genitalic evolution: theory and data. In: The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals (J.Leonard & A.Cordoba-Aguilar, eds), pp. 4078. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.
  • Eberhard, W.G. 2011. Experiments with genitalia: a commentary. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 1721.
  • Edvardsson, M. & Canal, D. 2006. The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Behav. Ecol. 17: 430434.
  • Freckleton, R.P. 2009. The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 13671375.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712726.
  • Gerhardt, U. 1913. Copulation und Spermatophoren von Grylliden und Locustiden. I. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 35: 415532.
  • Gerhardt, U. 1914. Copulation und Spermatophoren von Grylliden und Locustiden. II. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 37: 164.
  • Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326: 119157.
  • Gwynne, D.T. 1981. Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show role reversal in mate choice. Science 213: 779780.
  • Gwynne, D.T. 1982. Mate selection by female Katydids (orthoptera: tettigoniidae, Conocephalus nigropleurum). Anim. Behav. 30: 734738.
  • Gwynne, D.T. 2001. Katydids and Bush-Crickets: Reproductive Behavior and the Evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Cornell University Press, Ithaka.
  • Gwynne, D.T. 2008. Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 83101.
  • Hartley, J.C. & Warne, A.C. 1984. Taxonomy of the Ephippiger ephippiger complex (ephippiger, cruciger and cunii) with special reference to the mechanics of copulation (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Eos 60: 4354.
  • Hartley, J.C. & Dean, R.L. 1974. Ephippiger cruciger as a laboratory insect (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Nat. Hist. 8: 349354.
  • Harz, K. 1969. Die Orthopteren Europas/The Orthoptera of Europe I. Dr. W. Junk, Gravenhage.
  • Holwell, G.I., Winnick, C., Tregenza, T. & Herberstein, M.E. 2010. Genital shape correlates with sperm transfer success in the praying mantis Ciulfina klassi (Insecta: Mantodea). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 617625.
  • Hosken, D.J. & Stockley, P. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 8793.
  • Ingrisch, S. 1998. Monograph of the Oriental Agraeciini (Insecta, Ensifera, Tettigoniidae): taxonomic revision, phylogeny, biogeography, stridulation and development. Cour. Forsch. -Inst. Senckenberg 206: 1391.
  • Larivière, S. & Ferguson, S.H. 2002. On the evolution of the mammalian baculum: vaginal friction, prolonged intromission or induced ovulation? Mammal Rev. 32: 283294.
  • Lehmann, A.W. 1998. Artbildung, akustische Kommunikation und sexuelle Selektion bei griechischen Laubheuschrecken der Poecilimon propinquus-Gruppe (Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). PhD University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
  • Lehmann, A.W. & Heller, K.-G. 1998. Evolution of genitalia in bushcrickets of the Poecilimon propinquus-group and their role in reproductive isolation. Zoology 101(Suppl. 1): 29 [abstract].
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. 2007. Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Aust. J. Zool. 55: 123130.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. & Lehmann, A.W. 2000a. Spermatophore characteristics in bushcrickets vary with parasitism and remating interval. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47: 393399.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. & Lehmann, A.W. 2000b. Female bushcrickets mated with parasitized males show rapid remating and reduced fecundity (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae: Poecilimon mariannae). Naturwissenschaften 87: 404407.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. & Lehmann, A.W. 2007. Sex differences in “time out” from reproductive activity and sexual selection in male bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Zaprochilinae: Kawanaphila mirla). J. Insect Behav. 20: 215227.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. & Lehmann, A.W. 2008. Bushcricket song as a clue for spermatophore size? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 569578.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C. & Lehmann, A.W. 2009. Condition-dependent spermatophore size is correlated with male’s age in a bushcricket (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 354360.
  • Lehmann, G.U.C., Siozios, S., Bourtzis, K., Reinhold, K. & Lehmann, A.W. 2011. Thelytokous parthenogenesis and the heterogeneous decay of mating behaviours in a bushcricket. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 49: 102109.
  • Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646667.
  • McCartney, J., Heller, K.-G., Potter, M.A., Robertson, A.W., Telscher, K., Lehmann, G.U.C. et al. 2008. Understanding the size of nuptial gifts in bush-crickets: an analysis of the genus Poecilimon (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). J. Orthop. Res. 17: 231242.
  • McCartney, J., Lehmann, A.W. & Lehmann, G.U.C. 2010. Lifetime spermatophore investment in natural populations of two closely related bush-cricket species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Poecilimon propinquus-group). Behaviour 147: 285298.
  • Naskrecki, P. 2000. The phylogeny of katydids (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Tettigoniidae) and the evolution of their acoustic behaviour. PhD, University of Connecticut, USA.
  • Naskrecki, P. & Bazelet, C.S. 2009. A species radiation among South African flightless spring katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae: Brinckiella Chopard). Zootaxa 2056: 4662.
  • Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • R Core Development Team 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org.
  • Rentz, D.C.F. 1972. The lock and key as an isolating mechanism in katydids. Am. Sci. 60: 750755.
  • Rentz, D.C.F. 1985. A monograph of the Tettigoniidae of Australia: Volume 1: The Tettigoniinae. CSIRO, Melbourne.
  • Rentz, D.C.F. 1993. A monograph of the Tettigoniidae of Australia: Volume 2: The Austrosaginae, Phasmodinae and Zaprochilinae. CSIRO, Melbourne.
  • Rentz, D.C.F. 2001. A monograph of the Tettigoniidae of Australia: Volume 3: The Listroscelidinae, Tympanophorinae, Meconematinae and Microtettigoniinae. CSIRO, Melbourne.
  • Rentz, D.C.F. & Colless, D.H. 1990. A classification of the shield-back katydids (Tettigoniinae) of the world. In: The Tettigoniidae: Biology, Systematics and Evolution (W.J.Bailey & D.C.F.Rentz, eds), pp. 352377. Crawford House Press, Bathurst.
  • Rentz, D.C.F., Su, Y.N. & Ueshima, N. 2010. Studies in Australian Tettigoniidae: Australian Pseudophylline katydids (Tettigoniinae; Pseudophyllinae; Phyllomimini). Zootaxa 2566: 120.
  • Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Takami, Y. & Sota, T. 2007. Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 13851395.
  • Ullrich, B., Reinhold, K., Niehuis, O. & Misof, B. 2010. Secondary structure and phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 of bush crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Barbitistini). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 48: 219228.
  • Vahed, K. 1996. Prolonged copulations in oak bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae: Meconematinae: Meconema thalassinum and M. meridionale). J. Orthop. Res. 5: 199204.
  • Vahed, K. 1997. Copulation and spermatophores in the Ephippigerinae (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): Prolonged copulation is associated with a smaller nuptial gift in Uromenus rugosicollis Serville. J. Orthop. Res. 6: 8389.
  • Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73: 4378.
  • Vahed, K. 2006. Larger ejaculate volumes are associated with a lower degree of polyandry across bushcricket taxa. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273: 23872394.
  • Vahed, K. 2007a. Comparative evidence for a cost to males of manipulating females in bushcrickets. Behav. Ecol. 18: 499506.
  • Vahed, K. 2007b. All that glisters is not gold: sensory bias, sexual conflict and nuptial feeding in insects and spiders. Ethology 113: 105127.
  • Vahed, K. & Carron, G. 2008. Comparison of forced mating behaviour in four taxa of Anonconotus, the Alpine bushcricket. J. Zool. 276: 313321.
  • Vahed, K. & Gilbert, F.S. 1996. Differences across taxa in nuptial gift size correlate with differences in sperm number and ejaculate volume in bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 12571265.
  • Voigt, C.C., Michener, R. & Kunz, T.H. 2005. The energetics of trading nuptial gifts for copulations in katydids. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 78: 417423.
  • Voigt, C.C., Lehmann, G.U.C., Michener, R.H. & Joachimski, M.M. 2006. Nuptial feeding is reflected in tissue nitrogen isotope ratios of female katydids. Funct. Ecol. 20: 656661.
  • Voigt, C.C., Kretzschmar, A.S., Speakman, J.R. & Lehmann, G.U.C. 2008. Female bushcrickets fuel their metabolism with male nuptial gifts. Biol. Lett. 4: 476478.
  • Wang, Q. & Millar, J.G. 1997. Reproductive behavior of Thyanta pallidovirens (Heteroptera: Pentantomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 90: 380388.
  • Wedell, N. 1992. Protandry and mate assessment in the wartbiter Decticus verrucivorus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 301308.