Order of authorship determined by chance.
The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection
Version of Record online: 23 JAN 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 25, Issue 3, pages 591–598, March 2012
How to Cite
JENNIONS, M. D., KOKKO, H. and KLUG, H. (2012), The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25: 591–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02451.x
- Issue online: 13 FEB 2012
- Version of Record online: 23 JAN 2012
- Received 6 November 2011; revised 12 December 2011; accepted 13 December 2011
- 2010. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection. Am. Nat. 176: 249–263. , , , , , et al.
- 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709–719. &
- 2010. Quantifying sexual selection: a comparison of competing indices with mating system data from a terrestrially breeding salamander. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 73–83.
- 1958. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum. Biol. 30: 1–13.
- 1987. Opportunity for selection: an appropriate measure for evaluating variation in the potential for selection? Evolution 41: 1395–1400. , &
- 1994. The fundamental theorem of natural selection. Biol. Rev. 69: 443–474.
- 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223. &
- 2001. Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 667–686. &
- 2011. Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 178: 256–268. &
- 1996. Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. &
- 2002. Geographic variation in male genitalia in Brachyrhaphis episcopi (Poecillidae): is it sexually or naturally selected? Oikos 97: 79–86. &
- 2010. Sexual selection. In: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (D.F. Westneat & C.W. Fox, eds), pp. 343–364. Oxford University Press, New York. &
- 2009. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient, and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63: 1673–1684.
- 2004. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 164: 444–456. , &
- 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman’s principles: an experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 874–884. , , &
- 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
- 2010a. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 447–462. , , &
- 2010b. Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1094–1102. , &
- 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 43–66. , &
- 2011. Persistence of an extreme male-biased adult sex ratio in a natural population of polyandrous bird. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1842–1846. , , &
- 2011. The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 2064–2071. , , , &
- 1989. Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 2007. Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: comparison of selection indices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 143–150. , , &
- 2011. Mating system change reduces the strength of sexual selection in an American frontier population of the 19th century. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32: 147–155. , , &
- 1993. Comparative mortality rates of male and female kudus: the costs of sexual size dimorphism. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 428–440.
- 2011. Female aggregation interacts with population structure to influence the degree of polygyny in red deer. Anim. Behav. 82: 957–970. &
- 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. &
- 1985. Chance can produce a difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman’s data. Anim. Behav. 33: 1349–1352.
- 1987. Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (J.W. Bradbury & M.B. Andersson, eds), pp. 209–219. Wiley, Chichester.
- 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114: 742–764.
- 1995. The ecology of sexual selection – mean crowding of females and resource-defense polygyny. Evol. Ecol. 9: 118–124.
- 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28: 446–461. &