Male quality, signal reliability and female choice: assessing the expectations of inter-sexual selection
Article first published online: 16 MAY 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 25, Issue 8, pages 1513–1520, August 2012
How to Cite
McLEAN, M. J., BISHOP, P. J. and NAKAGAWA, S. (2012), Male quality, signal reliability and female choice: assessing the expectations of inter-sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25: 1513–1520. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02533.x
- Issue published online: 16 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 16 MAY 2012
- Received 5 July 2011; revised 6 April 2012; accepted 10 April 2012
- 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences – sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804–816.
- 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 296–302. &
- 1988. Sexual dimorphism in body size – a model and a test. Evolution 42: 820–825.
- 1981. Mate choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution 35: 707–722.
- 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioural traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717–745. , &
- 2003. Interactions among mechanisms of sexual selection on male body size and head shape in a sexually dimorphic fly. Evolution 57: 2046–2053. &
- 2009. Syllable type consistency is related to age, social status and reproductive success in the tropical mockingbird. Anim. Behav. 77: 701–706. , , , , , et al.
- 2010. A key ecological trait drove the evolution of biparental care and monogamy in an amphibian. Am. Nat. 175: 436–446. , &
- 2007. Extrapair paternity in chestnut-sided warblers is correlated with consistent vocal performance. Behav. Ecol. 18: 130–136.
- 1999. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim. Behav. 58: 1261–1267.
- 1998. Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad. Anim. Behav. 56: 275–287. &
- 1992. Sexual selection in the leopard toad, Bufo pardalis. Behaviour 120: 164–176.
- 2010. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 145–152. &
- 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
- 1992. Male-behavior and correlates of mating success in a natural-population of African painted reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus). Herpetologica 48: 236–246. , , &
- 1998. Success breeds success in mating male reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus). Proc. Biol. Sci. 265: 1417–1421. , , &
- 1991. Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 125–131.
- 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: S125–S153.
- 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
- 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 293–324.
- 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33: 1–22.
- 2010. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 494–508. &
- 1988. Body size and age in amphibians and reptiles. J. Herpetol. 22: 253–265. &
- 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560. , , &
- 1996. Redness as a measure of the production cost of ornamental coloration. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8: 157–175.
- 1995. Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton. &
- 1985. Proximate mechanisms of sexual selection in wood frogs. Evolution 39: 260–277. &
- 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. 2. The handicap principle. Evolution 45: 1431–1442. &
- 1995. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle – reviewing the evidence. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 70: 1–65.
- 2009. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 10001–10008. &
- 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1–12.
- 1996. Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50: 2125–2140.
- 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 1282–1286. &
- 1984. Truth in advertising – the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124: 309–323. &
- 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269: 1331–1340. , , &
- 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37: 43–66. , &
- 1981. Mating success, fertilization potential, and male body size in the American toad (Bufo americanus). Herpetologica 37: 228–233.
- 2008. Male breeding success is predicted by call frequency in a territorial species, the agile frog (Rana dalmatina). Can. J. Zool. 86: 1273–1279. , &
- 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 264–271. &
- 1999. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266: 85–91. &
- 2001. How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88: 401–415. &
- 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 167–176. &
- 1989. Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis– the importance of identifying the scale of choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 275–281.
- 2001. Mate selection in Litoria chloris and Litoria xanthomera: females prefer smaller males. Austral Ecol. 26: 223–232. , &
- 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 82: 591–605. &
- 2010. The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals. Evolution 64: 3085–3100.
- R Development Core Team 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
- 2010. The challenge of finding a high-quality male: a treefrog solution based on female assessment of male calls. Behaviour 147: 1737–1752. , , , &
- 1990. Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog, Uperoleia laevigata. Anim. Behav. 39: 639–645.
- 1994. Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting psychological-research. Psychol. Sci. 5: 127–134. Direct Link:
- 1986. Factors influencing the evolution of acoustic communication – biological constraints. Brain Behav. Evol. 28: 70–82.
- 2009. Secondary sexual traits and individual phenotype in male green frogs (Rana clamitans). J. Herpetol. 43: 89–95. &
- 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. &
- 1991. Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 146–151.
- 2008. Mitochondrial and nuclear phylogeny of circum-Mediterranean tree frogs from the Hyla arborea group. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49: 1019–1024. , , , , &
- 1992. Sexual selection and calling behavior in the American toad (Bufo americanus). Copeia 1: 1–7.
- 1977. Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58: 750–762.
- 2009. Evolutionary and biogeographic origins of high tropical diversity in old world frogs (Ranidae). Evolution 63: 1217–1231. , , &
- 1978. Sexual selection in toads – roles of female choice and male body size. Evolution 32: 264–270. , &
- 1987. Paternal effects on offspring traits in Scaphiopus couchi (Anura, Pelobatidae). Oecologia 73: 626–629.
- 1975. Mate selection – selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.