Grain of environment explains variation in the strength of genotype × environment interaction
Version of Record online: 13 JUL 2012
© 2012 The Author. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 25, Issue 9, pages 1897–1901, September 2012
How to Cite
Rodríguez, R. L. (2012), Grain of environment explains variation in the strength of genotype × environment interaction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25: 1897–1901. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02565.x
- Issue online: 14 AUG 2012
- Version of Record online: 13 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 25 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 21 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Received: 10 MAR 2012
- 1993. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. Heredity 70: 400–406. &
- 2011. Linking the spatial scale of environmental variation and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: selection favors adaptive plasticity in fine-grained environments. Am. Nat. 178: 75–87.
- 2008. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica 134: 69–78. , , , &
- 2008. Host shifts, the evolution of communication, and speciation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers. In: Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects (K. Tilmon, ed), pp. 88–100. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. , &
- 2001. Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 150–156. &
- 1993. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. V. Evolution of reaction norm shape. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 31–48. &
- 1974. The role of environmental grain in the maintenance of genetic variation. Am. Nat. 108: 831–836.
- 1992. Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46: 390–411. &
- 2004. Genotype–environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68: 1461–1468. &
- 2001. Strength and tempo or directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9157–9160. , , , , , et al.
- 2008. Testing the grain–size model for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 62: 1381–1389.
- 2004. What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 329–333. , , &
- 2010. The role of genotype–by–environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2031–2045. , &
- 1997. When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1057–1063. &
- 2007. Genetics, and the potential signal content of iridescent ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Evolution 61: 168–183. &
- 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245–261. , , , , , et al.
- 2007. Relating environmental variation to selection on reaction norms: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 169: 163–174. , , , , &
- 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- 2007. The degree of adaptive phenotypic plasticity is correlated with the spatial environmental heterogeneity experienced by island populations of Rana temporaria. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 288–1297. &
- 2011. Gene flow and selection on phenotypic plasticity in an island system of Rana temporaria. Evolution 65: 684–697. , , , &
- 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. &
- 2005. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness. Evolution 59: 2414–2425. &
- 1992. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am. Nat. 139: 971–989.
- 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Revs. 82: 591–605. &
- 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling–song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49: 1271–1277. &
- 1999. Genotype–by–environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53: 1564–1572.
- 2008. Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms. Genetica 134: 113–127.
- 2011. Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Genetica 139: 871–884. &
- 2008. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence. Evolution 62: 12–20. , , &
- 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
- 1991. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 6, Sage Publications, Sage, California.
- 2007. Ancestral plasticity and the evolutionary diversification of courtship behaviour in threespine sticklebacks. Anim. Behav. 73: 415–422. , &
- 2003. Sire coloration influences offspring survival under predation risk in the moorfrog. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1288–1295. , , , &
- 2002. Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am. Nat. 160: 271–283. &
- 2006. Evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation. Science 311: 650–652. &
- 2008. Genetic basis of adaptive evolution of a polyphenism by genetic accommodation. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 57–66. &
- 1987. Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially variable environment: effects of genotype–environment interactions. Genet. Res. 49: 147–156. &
- 1995. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: genetic variability within and across different grains in Tribolium castaneum. Heredity 74: 80–90. &
- 1985. Genotype–environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505–522. &
- 2003. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context–dependent. Evolution 57: 883–893.
- 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
- 2005. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 6543–6549.