SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adrianov, A.V. & Malakhov, V.V. 1991. First finding of dwarf priapulids of the Genus Tubiluchus (Priapulida, Tubiluchidae) in Oceania (New Hebrides Isles). Zool. Zhurnal 70: 2332.
  • Adrianov, A.V. & Malakhov, V.V. 1995. Comparative morphological analysis of the organization of cephalorhynch worms: the phylogeny and systematics of the Phylum Cephalorhyncha. 5. Phylogeny and systematics. Zool. Zhurnal 74: 1927.
  • Adrianov, A.V. & Malakhov, V.V. 2001. Symmetry of priapulids (Priapulida). 1. Symmetry of adults. J. Morphol. 247: 99110.
  • Adrianov, A.V., Malakhov, V.V., Chesunov, A.V. & Tsetlin, A.B. 1989. Tubiluchus arcticus Sp. n. from the White Sea (Priapulomorpha, Tubiluchidae). Zool. Zhurnal 68: 126131.
  • Amor, A. 1975. Some unknown cuticular structures of Acanthopriapulus horridus Priapulida Priapulidae. Physis- Seccion A: Los Oceanos y sus Organismos 34: 441444.
  • Baddeley, A. & Turner, R. 2005. Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J. Stat. Softw. 12: 142.
  • Baltzer, F. 1931. Priapulidae. Kukenthal S Handbuch der Zoologie 2: 114.
  • Bouxin, G. 2005. Ginkgo, a multivariate analysis package. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 355359.
  • Briggs, D.E.G. & Fortey, R.A. 2005. Wonderful strife: systematics, stem groups, and the phylogenetic signal of the Cambrian radiation. Paleobiology 31: 94112.
  • Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A. & Wills, M.A. 1992. Morphological disparity in the Cambrian. Science 256: 16701673.
  • Brusatte, S.L., Benton, M.J., Ruta, M. & Lloyd, G.T. 2008. The first 50 Myr of dinosaur evolution: macroevolutionary pattern and morphological disparity. Biol. Lett. 4: 733736.
  • Budd, G.E. 2001. Tardigrades as ‘stem-group arthropods’: the evidence from the Cambrian fauna. Zool. Anz. 240: 265279.
  • Budd, G.E. 2003. Arthropods as ecdysozoans: the fossil evidence. In: The New Panorama of Animal Evolution: Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Zoology, Athens, Greece, September 2000. (A. Legakis, S. Sfenthourakis, R. Polymeni & M. Thessalou-Leggaki, eds), pp. 479487. Pensoft, Sofia.
  • Budd, G.E. & Jensen, S. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biol. Rev. 75: 253295.
  • Budd, G.E. & Jensen, S. 2003. The limitations of the fossil record and the dating of the origin of the Bilateria. In: Telling the Evolutionary Time: Molecular Clocks and the Fossil Record (P.C.J. Donoghue & M.P. Smith, eds), pp. 166189. Taylor and Francis, London.
  • Cailliez, F. 1983. The analytical solution of the additive constant problem. Psychometrika 48: 305308.
  • Calloway, C.B. 1975. Morphology of introvert and associated structures of priapulid Tubiluchus corallicola from Bermuda. Mar. Biol. 31: 161174.
  • Carlson, S.J. & Fitzgerald, P.C. 2008. Sampling taxa, estimating phylogeny and inferring macroevolution: an example from Devonian terebratulide brachiopods. Trans. Earth. Sci. 98: 311325.
  • Cheng, G., Peng, F., Duan, B. & Dong, X. 2011. Internal structure of Cambrian fossil embryo Markuelia revealed in the light of synchrotron radiation x-ray tomographic microscopy. Acta Geol. Sin. 85: 8190.
  • Cobbett, A., Wilkinson, M. & Wills, M.A. 2007. Fossils impact as hard as living taxa in parsimony analyses of morphology. Syst. Biol. 56: 753766.
  • Conway Morris, S. 1977. Fossil priapulid worms. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 20: 195.
  • Conway Morris, S. 1997. The cuticular structure of the 495-Myr-old type species of the fossil worm Palaeoscolex, P-piscatorum (?Priapulida). Univ. Kans. Paleontol. Contrib. Pap. 117: 6982.
  • Conway Morris, S. & Peel, J.S. 2010. New palaeoscolecidan worms from the Lower Cambrian: sirius Passet, Latham Shale and Kinzers Shale. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 55: 141156.
  • Conway Morris, S. & Robison, R.A. 1986. Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah USA and Spain. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper: 122.
  • Conway Morris, S., Pickerill, R.K. & Harland, T.L. 1982. A possible annelid from the Trenton Limestone (Ordovician) of Quebec, with a review of fossil oligochaetes and other annulate worms. Can. J. Earth Sci. 19: 21502157.
  • Dong, X.P. 2007. Developmental sequence of Cambrian embryo Markuelia. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52: 929935.
  • Dong, X.P., Donoghue, P.C.J., Cheng, H. & Liu, J.B. 2004. Fossil embryos from the Middle and Late Cambrian period of Hunan, South China. Nature 427: 237240.
  • Dong, X.P., Donoghue, P.C.J., Cunningham, J.A., Liu, J.B. & Cheng, H. 2005. The anatomy, affinity, and phylogenetic significance of Markuelia. Evol. Dev. 7: 468482.
  • Dong, X.-P., Bengtson, S., Gostling, N.J., Cunningham, J.A., Harvey, T.H.P., Kouchinsky, A. et al. 2010. The anatomy, taphonomy, taxonomy and systematic affinity of Markuelia: early Cambrian to Early Ordovician scalidophorans. Palaeontology 53: 12911314.
  • Dornbos, S.Q. & Chen, J.Y. 2008. Community palaeoecology of the early Cambrian Maotianshan Shale biota: ecological dominance of priapulid worms. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 258: 200212.
  • Dunn, C.W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D.Q., Pang, K., Browne, W.E., Smith, S.A. et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745749.
  • Erwin, D.H. 2007. Disparity: morphological pattern and developmental context. Palaeontology 50: 5773.
  • Erwin, D.H., Laflamme, M., Tweedt, S.M., Sperling, E.A., Pisani, D. & Peterson, K.J. 2012. The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 334: 10911097.
  • Finden, C.R. & Gordon, A.D. 1985. Obtaining common pruned trees. J. Classif. 2: 255276.
  • Flury, B.A. 1990. Principal points. Biometrika 77: 3341.
  • Flury, B.D. 1993. Estimation of principal points. Appl. Stat. 42: 139151.
  • Foote, M. 1990. Nearest-neighbor analysis of trilobite morphospace. Syst. Zool. 39: 371382.
  • Foote, M. 1992. Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 18: 1729.
  • Foote, M. 1997a. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 28: 129152.
  • Foote, M. 1997b. Sampling, taxonomic description, and our evolving knowledge of morphological diversity. Paleobiology 23: 181206.
  • Foote, M. 1999. Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology 25: 1115.
  • Forney, G.G., Jenkins, D.T. & Nitecki, M.H. 1977. Type fossil miscellanea (worms, problematica, conoidal shells, trace fossils) in Field Museum. Fieldiana Geol. 37: 144.
  • Fortey, R.A., Briggs, D.E.G. & Wills, M.A. 1996. The Cambrian evolutionary ‘explosion’: decoupling cladogenesis from morphological disparity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57: 1333.
  • Goloboff, P., Farris, S. & Nixon, K. 2000. TNT (Tree analysis using New Technology) (BETA). Published by the authors. Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Gould, S.J. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
  • Gould, S.J. 1993. How to analyze Burgess Shale disparity - a reply. Paleobiology 19: 522523.
  • Han, J., Zhang, X.L., Zhang, Z.F. & Shu, D.G. 2003a. A new platy-armored worm from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstatte, South China. Acta Geol. Sin. 77: 16.
  • Han, J., Zhang, Z. & Shu, D. 2003b. Discovery of the proboscis on Tylotites petiolaris. Northwestern Geol. 36: 8793.
  • Han, J., Shu, D., Zhang, Z.F. & Liu, J. 2004. The earliest-known ancestors of recent priapulomorpha from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstatte. Chin. Sci. Bull. 49: 18601868.
  • Han, J., Zhang, X.L., Zhang, Z.F. & Shu, D.G. 2006. A new theca-bearing Early Cambrian worm from the Chengjiang fossil Lagerstatte, China. Alcheringa 30: 110.
  • Han, J., Zhang, Z.F. & Liu, J.N. 2007a. The trace fossils of priapulids from the early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits and implications for their locomotory styles. J. China Univ. Geosci. 18: 392393.
  • Han, J.A., Liu, J.N., Zhang, Z.F., Zhang, X.L. & Shu, D.G. 2007b. Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 52: 423431.
  • Han, J.A., Zhang, Z.F., Liu, J.N. & Shu, D.G. 2007c. Evidence of priapulid scavenging from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, Southern China. Palaios 22: 691694.
  • Han, R., Yao, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, J. & Shu, D. 2007d. New observations on the palaeoscolecid worm Tylotites petiolaris from the Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstatte, south China. Paleontol. Res. 11: 5969.
  • Harvey, T.H.P., Dong, X.P. & Donoghue, P.C.J. 2010. Are palaeoscolecids ancestral ecdysozoans? Evol. Dev. 12: 177200.
  • Heath, T.A., Hedtke, S.M. & Hillis, D.M. 2008. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 46: 239257.
  • Hou, X.G., Aldridge, R.J., Bergström, J., Siveter, D.J. & Feng, X.H. 2004. Arthropods of the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Hu, S.X., Li, Y., Luo, H.L., Fu, X.P., You, T., Pang, J.Y. et al. 2008. New record of palaeoscolecids from the Early Cambrian of Yunnan, China. Acta Geol. Sinica 82: 244248.
  • Huang, D.Y., Vannier, J. & Chen, J.Y. 2004a. Anatomy and lifestyles of Early Cambrian priapulid worms exemplified by Corynetis and Anningvermis from the Maotianshan Shale (SW China). Lethaia 37: 2133.
  • Huang, D.Y., Vannier, J. & Chen, J.Y. 2004b. Recent Priapulidae and their Early Cambrian ancestors: comparisons and evolutionary significance. Geobios 37: 217228.
  • Huang, D.Y., Chen, J.Y. & Jean, V. 2006a. Origin and early evolution of small animal phyla: priapulida. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 36: 312314.
  • Huang, D.Y., Chen, J.Y. & Vannier, J. 2006b. Discussion on the systematic position of the Early Cambrian priapulomorph worms. Chin. Sci. Bull. 51: 243249.
  • Ivantsov, A.Y. & Wrona, R. 2004. Articulated palaeoscolecid sclerite arrays from the Lower Cambrian of eastern Siberia. Acta Geol. Pol. 54: 122.
  • Janssen, R., Wennberg, S.A. & Budd, G.E. 2009. The hatching larva of the priapulid worm Halicryptus spinulosus. Front. Zool. 6: 000.
  • Kirsteuer, E. 1976. Notes on adult morphology and larval development of Tubiluchus corallicola (Priapulida), based on in vivo and scanning electron-microscopic examinations of specimens from Bermuda. Zoolog. Scr. 5: 239255.
  • Klingenberg, C.P. & Froese, R. 1991. A multivariate comparison of allometric growth-patterns. Syst. Zool. 40: 410419.
  • Kraft, P. & Mergl, M. 1986. Worm-like fossils (Palaeoscolecida; ?Chaetognatha) from the Lower Ordovician of Bohemia. Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie 30: 936.
  • Lemburg, C. 1995a. Ultrastructure of the introvert and associated structures of the larvae of Halicryptus spinulosus (Priapulida). Zoomorphology 115: 1129.
  • Lemburg, C. 1995b. Ultrastructure of sense organs and receptors cells of the neck and lorica of the Halicryptus spinulosus larva (Priapulida). Microfauna Marina 10: 730.
  • Lemburg, C. 1999. Ultrastrukturelle Untersuchungen an den Larven von Halicryptus spinulosus und Priapulus caudatus. Hypothesen zur Phylogenie der Priapulida und deren Bedeutung für die Evolution der Nemathelminthes, Universität Göttingen. Göttingen. PhD.
  • Levinton, J.S. 2008. The Cambrian explosion: how do we use the evidence? Bioscience 58: 855864.
  • Li, G.L., Steel, M. & Zhang, L.X. 2008. More taxa are not necessarily better for the reconstruction of ancestral character states. Syst. Biol. 57: 647653.
  • Ma, X.Y., Hou, X.G. & Baines, D. 2010. Phylogeny and evolutionary significance of vermiform animals from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstatte. Sci. China Earth. Sci. 53: 17741783.
  • Maas, A., Huang, D.Y., Chen, J.Y., Waloszek, D. & Braun, A. 2007. Maotianshan Shale nemathelminths - morphology, biology, and the phylogeny of nemathelminthes. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 254: 288306.
  • Melville, R.V. 1985. Selkirkia columbia designated as type species of Selkirkia Priapulida. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 42: 249250.
  • Menzies, R.J. 1959. Priapulus abyssorum, new species, the first abyssal priapulid. Nature 184: 15851586.
  • Monge-Najera, J. & Hou, X.G. 2000. Disparity, decimation and the Cambrian “explosion”: comparison of early Cambrian and Present faunal communities with emphasis on velvet worms (Onychophora). Rev. Biol. Trop. 48: 333351.
  • Morse, M.P. 1981. Meiopriapulus fijiensis n. gen., n-sp.- an interstitial priapulid from coarse sand in Fiji. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 100: 239252.
  • Mounce, R.C.P. & Wills, M.A. 2011. Phylogenetic position of Diania challenged. Nature 476: E1.
  • Mueller, K.J. & Hinz-Schallreuter, I. 1993. Palaeoscolecid worms from the Middle Cambrian of Australia. Palaeontology 36: 549592.
  • Müller, K. 2004. PRAP – computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31: 780782.
  • Murina, V.V. & Starobogatov, Y.I. 1961. The systematics and zoogeography of the Priapulidae, Referat. Zhur., Biol., 1961, No. 5 Zh52. (Translation). Trudy Inst Okeanol Akad Nauk SSSR 46: 179200.
  • Neige, P. 2003. The macroevolutionary debate. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 2: 423433.
  • O'Leary, M.A. & Gatesy, J. 2008. Impact of increased character sampling on the phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla (mammalia): combined analysis including fossils. Cladistics 24: 397442.
  • Panero, J.L. & Funk, V.A. 2008. The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 47: 757782.
  • Parker, A. 2004. In the Blink of an Eye: How Vision Kick Started the Big Bang of Animal Evolution. The Free Press, London.
  • Paulay, G. & Holthuis, B.V. 1994. Biology and morphology of living Meiopriapulus fijiensis Morse (Priapulida). In: Reproduction and Development of Marine Invertebrates (W.H. Wilson, S.A. Stricker & G.L. Shinn, eds), pp. 158165. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • Peel, J.S. 2010. A corset-like fossil from the Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte of North Greenland and its implications for cycloneuralian evolution. J. Paleontol. 84: 332340.
  • Pick, K.S., Philippe, H., Schreiber, F., Erpenbeck, D., Jackson, D.J., Wrede, P. et al. 2010. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 19831987.
  • Por, F.D. 1980. The sedentary trap feeding Priapula and their phylogenetic position. Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, University of British Columbia.
  • Por, F.D. & Bromley, H.J. 1974. Morphology and Anatomy of Maccabeus tentaculatus (Priapulida-Seticoronaria). J. Zool. 173: 173197.
  • Rauschert, M. 1986. On the occurrence of Priapulus tuberculatospinosus Priapulida in the marine fauna of King George South Shetland Islands Antarctica. Mitt. Mus. Naturkunde Berl. 62: 333336.
  • Ripley, B.D. & Rasson, J.P. 1977. Finding the edge of a Poisson forest. J. Appl. Probab. 14: 483491.
  • Robinson, D.F. & Foulds, L.R. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53: 131147.
  • Rothe, B.H., Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. & Todaro, M.A. 2006. The general muscular architecture in Tubiluchus troglodytes (Priapulida). Meiofauna Marina 15: 7986.
  • Ruta, M. 2009. Patterns of morphological evolution in major groups of Palaeozoic Temnospondyli (Amphibia: Tetrapoda). In: Patterns and Processes in Early Vertebrate Evolution (M. Ruta, J.A. Clack, A.C. Milner & A.R. Milner, eds), pp. 91120. The Palaeontological Association, London.
  • Sansom, R.S., Gabbott, S.E. & Purnell, M.A. 2010. Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation. Nature 463: 797800.
  • Schram, F.R. 1973. Pseudocoelomates and a nemertine from the Illinois pennsylvanian. J. Paleontol. 47: 985989.
  • Shapeero, W.L. 1962. The epidermis and cuticle of Priapulus caudatus Lamarck. Trans Amer Microsc. Soc. 81: 352355.
  • Shirley, T.C. & Storch, V. 1999. Halicryptus higginsi n.sp (Priapulida) - a giant new species from Barrow, Alaska. Invertebr. Biol. 118: 404413.
  • Sorensen, M.V., Hebsgaard, M.B., Heiner, I., Glenner, H., Willerslev, E. & Kristensen, R.M. 2008. New data from an enigmatic phylum: evidence from molecular sequence data supports a sister-group relationship between Loricifera and Nematomorpha. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 46: 231239.
  • Sorenson, M.D. & Franzosa, E.A. 2007. TreeRot. Version 3. Boston University, Boston, MA.
  • Storch, V., Higgins, R.P. & Morse, M.P. 1989. Ultrastructure of the body wall of Meiopriapulus fijiensis (Priapulida). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 108: 319331.
  • Storch, V., Higgins, R.P., Anderson, P. & Svavarsson, J. 1995. Scanning and transmission electron-microscopic analysis of the introvert of Priapulopsis australis and Priapulopsis bicaudatus (Priapulida). Invertebr. Biol. 114: 6472.
  • Sun, W.G. & Hou, X.G. 1987. Early Cambrian worms from the Chengjiang, Yunnan, China: Moatianshania gen. nov. Acta Palaeontol. Sinica 26: 303305.
  • Swofford, D.L. 2002. . PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods).Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Telford, M.J., Bourlat, S.J., Economou, A., Papillon, D. & Rota-Stabelli, O. 2008. The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. Phil. Trans. Biol. Sci. 363: 15291537.
  • Todaro, M.A. & Shirley, T.C. 2003. A new meiobenthic priapulid (Priapulida, Tubiluchidae) from a Mediterranean submarine cave. Ital. J. Zool. 70: 7987.
  • Topper, T.P., Brock, G.A., Skovsted, C.B. & Paterson, J.R. 2010. Palaeoscolecid scleritome fragments with Hadimopanella plates from the early Cambrian of South Australia. Geol. Mag. 147: 8697.
  • Valentine, J.W. & Jablonski, D. 2003. Morphological and developmental macroevolution: a paleontological perspective. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 517522.
  • Valentine, J.W., Erwin, D.H. & Jablonski, D. 1996. Developmental evolution of metazoan bodyplans: the fossil evidence. Dev. Biol. 173: 373381.
  • Van Der Land, J. 1970. Systematics, zoogeography and ecology of the Priapulida. Zool. Verhandel. 112: 1118.
  • Van Der Land, J. 1982. Tubiluchus remanei new species Priapulida from the Red Sea. Neth. J. Zool 32: 324335.
  • Van Der Land, J. 1985. Two new species of Tubiluchus (Priapulida) from the Pacific Ocean. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Wetenschappen 88: 371377.
  • Von Salvini-Plawen, L. 1973. A priapulid with cleptocnids from the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Biol. 20: 165169.
  • Waggoner, B.M. 1996. Phylogenetic hypotheses of the relationships of arthropods to Precambrian and Cambrian problematic fossil taxa. Syst. Biol. 45: 190222.
  • Wagner, P.J. 2000. Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54: 365386.
  • Wagner, P.J., Ruta, M. & Coates, M.I. 2006. Evolutionary patterns in early tetrapods. II. Differing constraints on available character space among clades. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 273: 21132118.
  • Walcott, C.D. 1911a. Middle Cambrian holothurians and medusae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 57: 4168.
  • Walcott, C.D. 1911b. Middle cambrian annelids. Cambrian geology and paleontology. II. Smithsonian Misc. Collect. 57: 109134.
  • Webster, B.L., Copley, R.R., Jenner, R.A., Mackenzie-Dodds, J.A., Bourlat, S.J., Rota-Stabelli, O. et al. 2006. Mitogenomics and phylogenomics reveal priapulid worms as extant models of the ancestral Ecdysozoan. Evol. Dev. 8: 502510.
  • Webster, B.L., Mackenzie-Dodds, J.A., Telford, M.J. & Littlewood, D.T.J. 2007. The mitochondrial genome of Priapulus caudatus Lamarck (Priapulida: Priapulidae). Gene 389: 96105.
  • Wennberg, S.A., Janssen, R. & Budd, G.E. 2009. Hatching and earliest larval stages of the priapulid worm Priapulus caudatus. Invertebr. Biol. 128: 157171.
  • Whittard, W.F. 1953. Palaeoscolex piscatorum gen. et. sp. nov., a worm from the Tremadocian of Shropshire. Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 109: 125135.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52: 528538.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst. Biol. 54: 731742.
  • Wiens, J.J. 2006. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inform. 39: 3442.
  • Wilkinson, M. 1995. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44: 501514.
  • Wills, M.A. 1998a. Crustacean disparity through the Phanerozoic: comparing morphological and stratigraphic data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 455500.
  • Wills, M.A. 1998b. Cambrian and recent disparity: the picture from priapulids. Paleobiology 24: 177199.
  • Wills, M.A. 1999. Congruence between phylogeny and stratigraphy: randomization tests and the gap excess ratio. Syst. Biol. 48: 559580.
  • Wills, M.A. 2001. Morphological disparity: a primer. In: Fossils, Phylogeny and Form: An Analytical Approach (J. Adrain, B. Lieberman & G. Edgecombe, eds), pp. 55144. Plenum, New York.
  • Wills, M.A. & Fortey, R.A. 2000. The shape of life: how much is written in stone? BioEssays 22: 11421152.
  • Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G. & Fortey, R.A. 1994. Disparity as an evolutionary index – a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology 20: 93130.
  • Wills, M.A., Barrett, P.M. & Heathcote, J.F. 2008. The modified gap excess ratio (GER*) and the stratigraphic congruence of dinosaur phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 57: 891904.
  • Wray, G.A., Levinton, J.S. & Shapiro, L.H. 1996. Molecular evidence for deep precambrian divergences among metazoan phyla. Science 274: 568573.
  • Zhang, X.G., Hou, X.G. & Bergstrom, J. 2006. Early Cambrian priapulid worms buried with their lined burrows. Geol. Mag. 143: 743748.
  • Zrzavy, J. 2003. Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogeny. Zoolog. Scr. 32: 6181.