Calcitonin (CT) inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and induces calcium uptake from body fluids. A comparative study of the conformational behaviours of therapeutic calcitonins [salmon (s), eel (e), a synthetic eel calcitonin analogue (Elcatonin), porcine (p) and human (h) calcitonins] as a function of solvent polarity and temperature have been performed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Elements of secondary structure were lacking in H2O but could be observed in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and sodium dodecyl sulphate. In particular, similar amounts of α-helical content (four α-helical turns) were estimated in trifluoroethanol despite the considerable differences in amino acid sequences. The relative ability to form an α helix, assessed by trifluoroethanol/H2O titration, was found to be Elcatonin > sCT > pCT > eCT > hCT. In Elcatonin, sCT, pCT and eCT the four α-helical turns were promoted almost completely in a single step, between 0 and 35% trifluoroethanol, unlike hCT where helical structure formation has been reported to involve two steps over the whole trifluoroethanol/H2O range [Arvinte, T. & Drake, A. F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6408–6414]. In SDS, which mimics the membrane environment, conformational differences (3–4 helical turns in Elcatonin, sCT, eCT versus one helical turn in pCT, hCT) were observed and correlate well with biological activity (Elcatonin = sCT = eCT > pCT = hCT).
Low-temperature studies in a cryogenic solvent mixture showed the formation of high α-helix content (similar to that in trifluoroethanol) in Elcatonin, sCT, eCT and pCT, whilst a left-handed extended helix (31 helix) was formed in hCT. This is consistent with the hypothesis of ‘linear’ and ‘helical’ calcitonin receptors [Nakanuta, H., Orlowski, R. C. & Epand, R. M. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 163–169].
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
difference in molar absorption coefficient ɛ between left and right circularly polarized light