Morphological and genetic evidence of contemporary intersectional hybridisation in Mediterranean Helichrysum (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae)
Article first published online: 22 MAR 2012
© 2012 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
Volume 14, Issue 5, pages 789–800, September 2012
How to Cite
Galbany-Casals, M., Carnicero-Campmany, P., Blanco-Moreno, J. M. and Smissen, R. D. (2012), Morphological and genetic evidence of contemporary intersectional hybridisation in Mediterranean Helichrysum (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae). Plant Biology, 14: 789–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00568.x
- Issue published online: 1 AUG 2012
- Article first published online: 22 MAR 2012
- Received: 9 September 2011; Accepted: 14 January 2012
Table S1. Specimens used in analyses, voucher information and Genbank accession numbers. Identity (ID) is: O, H. orientale; B, backcross; H, hybrid; S, H. stoechas.
Fig. S1. Depiction of the four steps for detection of the true number of groups K* according to Evanno et al. (2005). A: Mean L(K) (± SD) over ten runs for each K value. B: Mean rate of change of the likelihood distribution calculated as L′(<SMALLCAPS>K</SMALLCAPS>) = L( K) – L(K – 1). C: Mean absolute values of the second-order rate of change of the likelihood distribution calculated according to the formula: |L′′(K)| = |L′(K + 1) – L′(K)|. D: ΔK calculated as ΔK = m|L′′(K)|/s[L(K)]. The modal value of this distribution indicates the true K(*), here two groups.
Fig. S2. Mitotic metaphases. A: H. stoechas (specimen M. Galbany 2142), 2n = 28; B: H. orientale (specimen M. Galbany 2149, number 13), 2n = 28. Scale bar = 10 μm.
|PLB_568_sm_TableS1-S2-FigS1-S2.pdf||2975K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.