These authors contributed equally to this work.
Identification and expression analysis of components involved in rice Xa21-mediated disease resistance signalling
Article first published online: 7 JUN 2012
© 2012 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
Volume 14, Issue 6, pages 914–922, November 2012
How to Cite
Bai, H., Lan, J. P., Gan, Q., Wang, X. Y., Hou, M. M., Cao, Y. H., Li, L. Y., Liu, L. J., Hao, Y. J., Yin, C. C., Wu, L., Zhu, L. H. and Liu, G. Z. (2012), Identification and expression analysis of components involved in rice Xa21-mediated disease resistance signalling. Plant Biology, 14: 914–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00585.x
- Issue published online: 29 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 7 JUN 2012
- Received: 20 January 2012; Accepted: 12 February 2012
- Antibody-based proteomics;
- bacterial blight;
Rice Xa21 gene encodes a receptor-like kinase that confers broad-spectrum resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). Recently, a number of genes involved in the Xa21-mediated disease resistance pathway have been identified. Based on our previous data and the literature, we chose 16 candidate proteins and made corresponding antibodies. Using Western blotting, we systematically investigated the expression profile of the proteins in Xa21-mediated disease resistance response. We found nine proteins with altered expression. We further compared their expression in resistance, susceptible and mock responses, and found that GST expression was up-regulated during the resistance process, indicating GST is a positive regulator in resistance responses. ATPsB expression was down-regulated during both the resistance and susceptible response processes, although it was higher in the resistance response than that in the susceptible response. The total amount of MYB, GAPDH, CatB, Trx and NB-ARC proteins was lower in the resistance than in the susceptible response, but their abundance per unit bacteria in the resistance response was still higher than in the susceptible response, suggesting that these proteins might be positive regulators in the resistance response. In addition, expression of another ERF was induced by inoculation with bacterial blight pathogen, and expression of Zf-LSD1 was activated by wounding stress alone. Interestingly, most proteins showed similar altered expression patterns in the resistance and susceptible responses, but differed to some extents, implying that both responses might share common molecular mechanisms. This study revealed evidence of resistance-related protein expression, providing a foundation for better understanding of their functions.