Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn?
Article first published online: 15 JAN 2007
Volume 113, Issue 1, pages 1–8, January 2007
How to Cite
Taborsky, M. (2007), Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn?. Ethology, 113: 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01329.x
- Issue published online: 15 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 15 JAN 2007
Peer review procedures and citation statistics are important yet often neglected components of the scientific publication process. Here I discuss fundamental consequences of such quality measures for the scientific community and propose three remedial actions: (1) use of a ‘‘Combined Impact Estimate’’ as a measure of citation statistics, (2) adoption of an open reviewing policy and (3) acceleration of the publication process in order to raise the reputation of the entire discipline (in our case: behavioural science). Authors, reviewers and editors are invited to contribute to the improvement of publication practice.