SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Altmann, J. 1997: Mate choice and intrasexual reproductive competition: contributions that go beyond acquiring more mates. In: Feminism and Evolutionary Biology (Gowaty, P. A., ed). Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 320333.
  • Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
  • Andrade, M. C. B. 1996: Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271, 7072.
  • Bateman, A. J. 1948: Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349368.
  • Bonduriansky, R. & Brooks, R. J. 1998: Male antler flies (Protopiophila litigata; Diptera: Piophilidae) are more selective than females in mate choice. Can. J. Zool. 76, 12771285.
  • Byrne, P. G. & Rice, W. R. 2006: Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273, 917922.
  • Carducci, J. P. & Jakob, E. M. 2000: Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. Anim. Behav. 59, 3946.
  • Cratsley, C. K. & Lewis, S. M. 2005: Seasonal variation in mate choice of Photinus ignitus fireflies. Ethology 111, 89100.
  • Dosen, L. D. & Montgomerie, R. 2004: Female size influences mate preferences of male guppies. Ethology 110, 245255.
  • Drickamer, L. C., Gowaty, P. A. & Wagner, D. M. 2003: Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 65, 105114.
  • Elgar, M. A. 1992: Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. In: Cannibalism (Elgar, M. A. & Crespi, B. J., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 128155.
  • Faber, D. B. & Baylis, J. R. 1993: Effects of body size on agonistic encounters between male jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim. Behav. 45, 289299.
  • Gowaty, P. A., Drickamer, L. C. & Schmid-Holmes, S. 2003: Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Anim. Behav. 65, 95103.
  • Harland, D. P. & Jackson, R. R. 2000: ‘Eight-legged cats’ and how they see – a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Cimbebasia 16, 231240.
  • Harland, D. P. & Jackson, R. R. 2001: Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: species that elicit cryptic stalking. J. Zool. 255, 445460.
  • Harland, D. P. & Jackson, R. R. 2004: Portia perceptions: the Umwelt of an araneophagic jumping spider. In: Complex Worlds from Simpler Nervous Systems (Prete, F. R., ed). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 540.
  • Herdman, E. J. E., Kelly, C. D. & Godin, J.-G. J. 2004: Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): do males prefer larger females as mates? Ethology 110, 97111.
  • Homann, H. 1971: Die Augen der Araneae: Anatomie, Ontogenie und Bedeutung fur die Sustematik (Chelicerata, Arachnida). Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere 69, 201272.
  • Howell, D. C. 2002: Statistical Methods for Psychology. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
  • Hubble, S. P. & Johnson, L. K. 1987: Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130, 91112.
  • Jackson, R. R. 1981: Relationship between reproductive security and intersexual selection in a jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). Evolution 35, 601604.
  • Jackson, R. R. & Cooper, K. J. 1991: The influence of body size and prior residency on the outcome of male-male interactions of Marpissa marina, a New Zealand jumping spider (Araneae Salticidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3, 7982.
  • Jackson, R. R. & Hallas, S. E. A. 1986: Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata and P. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecific interactions. N. Z. J. Zool. 13, 423489.
  • Jackson, R. R. & Pollard, S. D. 1997: Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. (Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J., eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 340351.
  • Jackson, R. R., Nelson, X. J. & Sune, G. O. 2005: A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 1515515160.
  • Kokko, H. & Johnstone, R. A. 2002: Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 357, 319330.
  • Land, M. F. 1985: The morphology and optics of spider eyes. In: Neurobiology of Arachnids (Barth, F. G., ed). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 5378.
  • Land, M. F. & Nilsson, D.-E. 2002: Animal Eyes. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  • Pryke, S. R. & Andersson, S. 2002: A generalized female bias for long tails in a short-tailed widowbird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269, 21412146.
  • Rypstra, A. L., Wieg, C., Walker, S. E. & Persons, M. H. 2003: Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology 109, 315325.
  • Schneider, J. M., Gilberg, S., Fromhage, L. & Uhl, G. 2006: Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Anim. Behav. 71, 781788.
  • Shine, R. & Mason, R. T. 2001: Courting male garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) use multiple cues to identify potential mates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 465473.
  • Taylor, P. W., Hasson, O. & Clark, D. L. 2001: Initiation and resolution of jumping spider contests: roles for size, proximity, and early detection of rivals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 403413.
  • Trivers, R. L. 1972: Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (Campbell, B., ed). Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136179.
  • Wells, M. S. 1988: Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim. Behav. 36, 321326.