SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Berry, D. S. & Miller, K. M. 2001: When boy meets girl: attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. J. Res. Pers. 35, 6277.
  • Conway, C. A., Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M. & Little, A. C. 2008: Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 275, 6369.
  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. & Perrett, D. I. 2005: Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Horm. Behav. 47, 379383.
  • Feinberg, D., Jones, B., Little, A., Burt, D. & Perrett, D. 2005a: Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Anim. Behav. 69, 561568.
  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Moore, F. R., Law Smith, M. J., Cornwell, R. E., Tiddeman, B. P., Boothroyd, L. G. & Perrett, D. I. 2005b: The voice and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality? Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 398408.
  • Gangestad, S. W. & Scheyd, G. J. 2005: The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 34, 523548.
  • Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E. & Christensen, P. N. 2004: Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychol. Sci. 15, 203207.
    Direct Link:
  • Grammer, K. 1990: Strangers meet – laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. J. Nonverb. Behav. 14, 209236.
  • Grammer, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A. & Fink, B. 2000: Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 371390.
  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 2003: Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol. Rev. 78, 385407.
  • Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Feinberg, D. R., Cornwell, R. E., DeBruine, L. M., Roberts, S. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Smith, M. J. L., Moore, F. R., Davis, H. P. & Perrett, D. I. 2005: Women’s physical and psychological condition independently predict their preference for apparent health in faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 451457.
  • Lander, K. 2008: Relating visual and vocal attractiveness for moving and static faces. Anim. Behav. 75, 817822.
  • Lander, K. & Bruce, V. 2000: Recognizing famous faces: exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecol. Psychol. 12, 259272.
  • Lander, K. & Chuang, L. 2005: Why are moving faces easier to recognize? Vis. Cogn. 12, 429442.
  • Little, A. C. & Perrett, D. I. 2002: Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder: evolution and individual differences in face preference. Psychologist 15, 2832.
  • Little, A. C. & Perrett, D. I. 2007: Using composite face images to assess accuracy in personality attribution. Br. J. Psychol. 98, 111126.
  • Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. 2001: Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 268, 3944.
  • Morrison, E. R., Gralewski, L., Campbell, N. & Penton-Voak, I. S. 2007: Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 186192.
  • Penton-Voak, I. S. & Chang, H. Y. 2008: Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. J. Evol. Psychol. 6, 89100.
  • Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. 2000: Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 3948.
  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I. & Pierce, J. 1999: Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in attractiveness judgements. Curr. Psychol. 18, 104117.
  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2001: Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 268, 16171623.
  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound, N., Little, A. C. & Perrett, D. I. 2006: Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: more evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Soc. Cogn. 24, 490524.
  • Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. 1994: Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239242.
  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. 1998: Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884887.
  • Rhodes, G. 2006: The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199226.
  • Roberts, S. C. 2008: Nonverbal communication of mate quality in humans. In: Sociobiology of Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (D’Ettorre, P. & Hughes, D. P., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 157170.
  • Roberts, S. C. & Little, A. C. 2008: Good genes, complementary genes and human mate choice. Genetica 132, 309321.
  • Roberts, S. C., Havlicek, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I. & Petrie, M. 2004: Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proc. Roy. Soc. B (Suppl.) 271, S270S272.
  • Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. & Petrie, M. 2005a: MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 213226.
  • Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V. & Petrie, M. 2005b: MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Biol. Lett. 1, 400403.
  • Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Lyndon, A., Roberts, J., Havlicek, J. & Wright, R. L. 2009: Manipulation of body odour alters men’s self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 31, 4754.
  • Rubenstein, A. J. 2005: Variation in perceived attractiveness – differences between dynamic and static faces. Psychol. Sci. 16, 759762.
    Direct Link:
  • Saxton, T. K., Caryl, P. G. & Roberts, S. C. 2006: Vocal and facial attractiveness judgments of children, adolescents and adults: the ontogeny of mate choice. Ethology 112, 11791185.
  • Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999: Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 452460.
  • Tiddeman, B., Burt, M. & Perrett, D. 2001: Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 4250.
  • Willis, J. & Todorov, A. 2006: First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol. Sci. 17, 592598.
    Direct Link: