SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Table S1. Results of Cox regression testing the effects of female mating status, male age and male morph on the copulation latency in 2010 and 2011 experiments; p values for explanatory variables are combined according to Sokal & Rohlf (1981).

Table S2. Results of a generalized linear mixed model, with binomial error distribution, testing the effects of female mating status, male age and male morph (with pair identity included as a random factor) on male mounting success in 2010 and 2011 experiments; p values for explanatory variables are combined according to Sokal & Rohlf (1981).

Table S3. Results of a generalised linear mixed model, with binomial error distribution, testing the effects of female mating status, male age and male morph (with pair identity included as a random factor), on female mobility in the 2011 experiment.

Table S4. Results of Cox regression testing the effects of female mating status, male age and male morph on the latency to first mount in 2010 and 2011 experiments; p values for explanatory variables are combined according to Sokal & Rohlf (1981).

Table S5. Results of a general linear model testing the effects of female mating status, male age and male morph on male mounting effort (number of mounts per observation time, root-transformed) in 2010 and 2011 experiments; p values for explanatory variables are combined according to Sokal & Rohlf (1981).

Table S6. Results of a generalised linear model, with quasibinomial error distribution, testing the effects of female status, male age and morph, and male effort on the probability of copulation occurring within the observation time.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
ETH_2006_sm_TableS1-S6.pdf67KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.