ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion and gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet
Article first published online: 22 NOV 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x
© 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH
Issue

Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Volume 95, Issue 5, pages 564–570, October 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Franz, R., Kreuzer, M., Hummel, J., Hatt, J.-M. and Clauss, M. (2011), Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion and gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95: 564–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 22 NOV 2010
- Received: 18 June 2010; accepted: 17 August 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- herbivory;
- hindgut fermenter;
- caecum fermenter;
- coprophagy;
- cecotrophy;
- rodent;
- lagomorph
Summary
A colonic separation mechanism (CSM) is the prerequisite for the digestive strategy of coprophagy. Two different CSM are known in small herbivores, the ‘wash-back’ CSM of lagomorphs and the ‘mucous-trap’ CSM of rodents. Differences between these groups in their digestive pattern when fed exclusively hay were investigated in six rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and six guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Intake, digestibility (by total faecal collection), solute and particle mean retention times (MRT, using Co-EDTA and Cr-mordanted fibres) were measured. Rabbits selected less fibrous parts of the hay than guinea pigs, leaving orts with higher content of neutral detergent fibre [NDF; 721 ± 21 vs. 642 ± 31 g/kg dry matter (DM) in guinea pigs]. They also expressed a lower NDF digestibility (0.44 ± 0.10 vs. 0.55 ± 0.05 of total), a similar particle MRT (15 ± 3 vs. 18 ± 6 h), a longer solute MRT (51 ± 9 vs. 16 ± 4 h), and a lower calculated dry matter gut fill (19.6 ± 4.7 vs. 29.7 ± 4.1 g DM/kg body mass) than guinea pigs (p < 0.05 for each variable). These results support the assumption that the ‘wash-back’ CSM, exhibited in the rabbits, is more efficient in extracting bacterial matter from the colonic digesta plug than the ‘mucous-trap’ CSM found in the guinea pigs. Related to metabolic body mass, rabbits therefore need a less capacious colon for their CSM where a more efficient bacteria wash-out is reflected in the lower fibre digestibility. A lighter digestive tract could contribute to a peculiarity of lagomorphs: their ability to run faster than other similar-sized mammals.

1439-0396/asset/JPN_right.gif?v=1&s=477770c933e9f1b411b9998cd6e702d1c1d2fe8b)