SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alberio R, Johnson AD, 2012: Epigenetic reprogramming with oocyte molecules. In: Ainscough J, Yamanaka S, Tada T (eds), Nuclear reprogramming and stem cells. Springer Verlag, NY, pp. 4557.
  • Alberio R, Croxall N, Allegrucci C, 2010: Pig epiblast stem cells depend on activin/nodal signaling for pluripotency and self-renewal. Stem Cells Dev 19, 16271636.
  • Behboodi E, Bondareva A, Begin I, Rao K, Neveu N, Pierson JT, Wylie C, Piero FD, Huang YJ, Zeng W, Tanco V, Baldassarre H, Karatzas CN, Dobrinski I, 2011: Establishment of goat embryonic stem cells from in vivo produced blastocyst-stage embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 78, 202211.
  • Brevini TA, Antonini S, Cillo F, Crestan M, Gandolfi F, 2007: Porcine embryonic stem cells: facts, challenges and hopes. Theriogenology 68(Suppl. 1), S206S213.
  • Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Rugg-Gunn P, Sun B, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Howlett SK, Clarkson A, Ahrlund-Richter L, Pedersen RA, Vallier L, 2007: Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191195.
  • Brook FA, Gardner RL, 1997: The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 57095712.
  • Buecker C, Geijsen N, 2010: Different flavors of pluripotency, molecular mechanisms, and practical implications. Cell Stem Cell 7, 559564.
  • Cao S, Wang F, Chen Z, Liu Z, Mei C, Wu H, Huang J, Li C, Zhou L, Liu L, 2009: Isolation and culture of primary bovine embryonic stem cell colonies by a novel method. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 311, 368376.
  • Cauffman G, De Rycke M, Sermon K, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H, 2009: Markers that define stemness in ESC are unable to identify the totipotent cells in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 24, 6370.
  • Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, Smith A, 2003: Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643655.
  • Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, Robertson M, Vrana J, Jones K, Grotewold L, Smith A, 2007: Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 12301234.
  • Chen LR, Shiue YL, Bertolini L, Medrano JF, BonDurant RH, Anderson GB, 1999: Establishment of pluripotent cell lines from porcine preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology 52, 195212.
  • Chen AE, Egli D, Niakan K, Deng J, Akutsu H, Yamaki M, Cowan C, Fitz-Gerald C, Zhang K, Melton DA, Eggan K, 2009: Optimal timing of inner cell mass isolation increases the efficiency of human embryonic stem cell derivation and allows generation of sibling cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 4, 103106.
  • Cherny RA, Stokes TM, Merei J, Lom L, Brandon MR, Williams RL, 1994: Strategies for the isolation and characterization of bovine embryonic stem cells. Reprod Fertil Dev 6, 569575.
  • Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de Leon FA, Robl JM, 1998: Transgenic bovine chimeric offspring produced from somatic cell-derived stem-like cells. Nat Biotechnol 16, 642646.
  • Degrelle SA, Campion E, Cabau C, Piumi F, Reinaud P, Richard C, Renard JP, Hue I, 2005: Molecular evidence for a critical period in mural trophoblast development in bovine blastocysts. Dev Biol 288, 448460.
  • Dietrich JE, Hiiragi T, 2007: Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. Development 134, 42194231.
  • Dixon JE, Allegrucci C, Redwood C, Kump K, Bian Y, Chatfield J, Chen YH, Sottile V, Voss SR, Alberio R, Johnson AD, 2010: Axolotl Nanog activity in mouse embryonic stem cells demonstrates that ground state pluripotency is conserved from urodele amphibians to mammals. Development 137, 29732980.
  • Donovan PJ, Stott D, Cairns LA, Heasman J, Wylie CC, 1986: Migratory and postmigratory mouse primordial germ cells behave differently in culture. Cell 44, 831838.
  • Durcova-Hills G, Hajkova P, Sullivan S, Barton S, Surani MA, McLaren A, 2006: Influence of sex chromosome constitution on the genomic imprinting of germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 1118411188.
  • Esteban MA, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W, Jiang Z, Chen J, Deng K, Zhong M, Cai J, Lai L, Pei D, 2009: Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig. J Biol Chem 284, 1763417640.
  • Evans MJ, Kaufman MH, 1981: Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154156.
  • Ezashi T, Telugu BP, Alexenko AP, Sachdev S, Sinha S, Roberts RM, 2009: Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 1099310998.
  • Gerfen RW, Wheeler MB, 1995: Isolation of embryonic cell-lines from porcine blastocysts. Animal Biotechnology 6, 114.
  • Ginis I, Luo Y, Miura T, Thies S, Brandenberger R, Gerecht-Nir S, Amit M, Hoke A, Carpenter MK, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rao MS, 2004: Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 269, 360380.
  • Guo G, Yang J, Nichols J, Hall JS, Eyres I, Mansfield W, Smith A, 2009: Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136, 10631069.
  • Hall VJ, Christensen J, Gao Y, Schmidt MH, Hyttel P, 2009: Porcine pluripotency cell signaling develops from the inner cell mass to the epiblast during early development. Dev Dyn 238, 20142024.
  • Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Mitalipova M, Cheng AW, Cassady JP, Staerk J, Carey BW, Lengner CJ, Foreman R, Love J, Gao Q, Kim J, Jaenisch R, 2009a: Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 4, 513524.
  • Hanna J, Saha K, Pando B, van Zon J, Lengner CJ, Creyghton MP, van Oudenaarden A, Jaenisch R, 2009b: Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462, 595601.
  • Hanna J, Cheng AW, Saha K, Kim J, Lengner CJ, Soldner F, Cassady JP, Muffat J, Carey BW, Jaenisch R, 2010a: Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 92229227.
  • Hanna JH, Saha K, Jaenisch R, 2010b: Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell 143, 508525.
  • Hochereau-de Reviers MT, Perreau C, 1993: In vitro culture of embryonic disc cells from porcine blastocysts. Reprod Nutr Dev, 33, 475483.
  • Hyldig SM, Croxall N, Contreras DA, Thomsen PD, Alberio R, 2011a: Epigenetic reprogramming in the porcine germ line. BMC Dev Biol 11, 11.
  • Hyldig SM, Ostrup O, Vejlsted M, Thomsen PD, 2011b: Changes of DNA methylation level and spatial arrangement of primordial germ cells in embryonic day 15 to embryonic day 28 pig embryos. Biol Reprod 84, 10871093.
  • Jia W, Yang W, Lei A, Gao Z, Yang C, Hua J, Huang W, Ma X, Wang H, Dou Z, 2008: A caprine chimera produced by injection of embryonic germ cells into a blastocyst. Theriogenology 69, 340348.
  • Keefer CL, Pant D, Blomberg L, Talbot NC, 2007: Challenges and prospects for the establishment of embryonic stem cell lines of domesticated ungulates. Anim Reprod Sci 98, 147168.
  • Klisch K, Contreras DA, Sun X, Brehm R, Bergmann M, Alberio R, 2011: The Sda/GM2-glycan is a carbohydrate marker of porcine primordial germ cells and of a subpopulation of spermatogonia in cattle, pigs, horses and llama. Reproduction 142, 667674.
  • Kuijk EW, Du PuyL, Van Tol HT, Oei CH, Haagsman HP, Colenbrander B, Roelen BA, 2008: Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals. Dev Dyn 237, 918927.
  • Labosky PA, Barlow DP, Hogan BL, 1994: Mouse embryonic germ (EG) cell lines: transmission through the germline and differences in the methylation imprint of insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene compared with embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Development 120, 31973204.
  • Leitch HG, Blair K, Mansfield W, Ayetey H, Humphreys P, Nichols J, Surani MA, Smith A, 2010: Embryonic germ cells from mice and rats exhibit properties consistent with a generic pluripotent ground state. Development 137, 22792287.
  • Li M, Zhang D, Hou Y, Jiao L, Zheng X, Wang WH, 2003: Isolation and culture of embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev 65, 429434.
  • Liang J, Wan M, Zhang Y, Gu P, Xin H, Jung SY, Qin J, Wong J, Cooney AJ, Liu D, Songyang Z, 2008: Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 10, 731739.
  • Martin GR, 1981: Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78, 76347638.
  • Matsui Y, Zsebo K, Hogan BL, 1992: Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture. Cell 70, 841847.
  • Mitalipova M, Beyhan Z, First NL, 2001: Pluripotency of bovine embryonic cell line derived from precompacting embryos. Cloning 3, 5967.
  • Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Maruyama M, Maeda M, Yamanaka S, 2003: The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631642.
  • Montserrat N, Bahima EG, Batlle L, Hafner S, Rodrigues AM, Gonzalez F, Izpisua Belmonte JC, 2011: Generation of pig iPS cells: a model for cell therapy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 4, 121130.
  • Mueller S, Prelle K, Rieger N, Petznek H, Lassnig C, Luksch U, Aigner B, Baetscher M, Wolf E, Mueller M, Brem G, 1999: Chimeric pigs following blastocyst injection of transgenic porcine primordial germ cells. Mol Reprod Dev 54, 244254.
  • Munoz M, Rodriguez A, De FrutosC, Caamano JN, Diez C, Facal N, Gomez E, 2008: Conventional pluripotency markers are unspecific for bovine embryonic-derived cell-lines. Theriogenology 69, 11591164.
  • Najm FJ, Chenoweth JG, Anderson PD, Nadeau JH, Redline RW, McKay RD, Tesar PJ, 2011: Isolation of epiblast stem cells from preimplantation mouse embryos. Cell Stem Cell 8, 318325.
  • Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V, Chureau C, Morey C, Rougeulle C, Avner P, 2008: Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321, 16931695.
  • Nichols J, Smith A, 2009: Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487492.
  • Nichols J, Silva J, Roode M, Smith A, 2009: Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development 136, 32153222.
  • Nowak-Imialek M, Kues W, Carnwath JW, Niemann H, 2011: Pluripotent stem cells and reprogrammed cells in farm animals. Microsc Microanal 17, 474497.
  • Okamura D, Tokitake Y, Niwa H, Matsui Y, 2008: Requirement of Oct3/4 function for germ cell specification. Dev Biol 317, 576584.
  • Petkov SG, Reh WA, Anderson GB, 2009: Methylation changes in porcine primordial germ cells. Mol Reprod Dev 76, 2230.
  • Petkov SG, Marks H, Klein T, Garcia RS, Gao Y, Stunnenberg H, Hyttel P, 2011: In vitro culture and characterization of putative porcine embryonic germ cells derived from domestic breeds and Yucatan mini pig embryos at Days 20–24 of gestation. Stem Cell Res 6, 226237.
  • Piedrahita JA, Moore K, Oetama B, Lee CK, Scales N, Ramsoondar J, Bazer FW, Ott T, 1998: Generation of transgenic porcine chimeras using primordial germ cell-derived colonies. Biol Reprod 58, 13211329.
  • du Puy L, Lopes SM, Haagsman HP, Roelen BA, 2011: Analysis of co-expression of OCT4, NANOG and SOX2 in pluripotent cells of the porcine embryo, in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 75, 513526.
  • Resnick JL, Bixler LS, Cheng L, Donovan PJ, 1992: Long-term proliferation of mouse primordial germ cells in culture. Nature 359, 550551.
  • Rodriguez-Perez A, Allegrucci C, Sweetman D, Alberio R, 2011: Interconversion of pluripotent cell states in pig induced pluripotent stem cells. In: Stem Cell Programming & Reprogramming Conference Proceedings. Cell Press, Lisbon, Portugal, p. 13.
  • Roelen BA, 2011: Of stem cells and germ cells. Reprod Domest Anim 46(Suppl. 3), 5359.
  • Roode M, Blair K, Snell P, Elder K, Marchant S, Smith A, Nichols J, 2012: Human hypoblast formation is not dependent on FGF signalling. Dev Biol 361, 358363.
  • Saitou M, Yamaji M, 2010: Germ cell specification in mice: signaling, transcription regulation, and epigenetic consequences. Reproduction 139, 931942.
  • Schuff M, Siegel D, Philipp M, Bundschu K, Heymann N, Donow C, Knochel W, 2012: Characterization of Danio rerio Nanog and Functional Comparison to Xenopus Vents. Stem Cells Dev 21, 12251238.
  • Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, Bugg EM, Littlefield JW, Donovan PJ, Blumenthal PD, Huggins GR, Gearhart JD, 1998: Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 1372613731.
  • Shim H, Gutierrez-Adan A, Chen LR, BonDurant RH, Behboodi E, Anderson GB, 1997: Isolation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured porcine primordial germ cells. Biol Reprod 57, 10891095.
  • Shovlin TC, Durcova-Hills G, Surani A, McLaren A, 2008: Heterogeneity in imprinted methylation patterns of pluripotent embryonic germ cells derived from pre-migratory mouse germ cells. Dev Biol 313, 674681.
  • Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen TW, Guo G, van Oosten AL, Barrandon O, Wray J, Yamanaka S, Chambers I, Smith A, 2009: Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722737.
  • Smith AG, Heath JK, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J, Stahl M, Rogers D, 1988: Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336, 688690.
  • Stern CD, 1979: A re-examination of mitotic activity in the early chick embryo. Anat Embryol (Berl) 156, 319329.
  • Stice SL, Strelchenko NS, Keefer CL, Matthews L, 1996: Pluripotent bovine embryonic cell lines direct embryonic development following nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 54, 100110.
  • Sumer H, Liu J, Malaver-Ortega LF, Lim ML, Khodadadi K, Verma PJ, 2011: NANOG is a key factor for induction of pluripotency in bovine adult fibroblasts. J Anim Sci 89, 27082716.
  • Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P, 2007: Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell 128, 747762.
  • Tada T, Tada M, Hilton K, Barton SC, Sado T, Takagi N, Surani MA, 1998: Epigenotype switching of imprintable loci in embryonic germ cells. Dev Genes Evol 207, 551561.
  • Telugu BP, Ezashi T, Roberts RM, 2010: Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells analogous to naive and primed embryonic stem cells of the mouse. Int J Dev Biol 54, 17031711.
  • Telugu BP, Ezashi T, Sinha S, Alexenko AP, Spate L, Prather RS, Roberts RM, 2011: Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent, pluripotent stem cells established from inner cell mass of porcine embryos. J Biol Chem 286, 2894828953.
  • Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP, Mack DL, Gardner RL, McKay RD, 2007: New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196199.
  • Theunissen TW, van Oosten AL, Castelo-Branco G, Hall J, Smith A, Silva JC, 2011: Nanog overcomes reprogramming barriers and induces pluripotency in minimal conditions. Curr Biol 21, 6571.
  • Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, Durning M, Harris CP, Hearn JP, 1996: Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol Reprod 55, 254259.
  • Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM, 1998: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 11451147.
  • Tong C, Li P, Wu NL, Yan Y, Ying QL, 2010: Production of p53 gene knockout rats by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature 467, 211213.
  • Vackova I, Ungrova A, Lopes F, 2007: Putative embryonic stem cell lines from pig embryos. J Reprod Dev 53, 11371149.
  • Vackova I, Novakova Z, Krylov V, Okada K, Kott T, Fulka H, Motlik J, 2011: Analysis of marker expression in porcine cell lines derived from blastocysts produced in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Dev 57, 594603.
  • Vallier L, Alexander M, Pedersen RA, 2005: Activin/Nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 118, 44954509.
  • Vallier L, Mendjan S, Brown S, Chng Z, Teo A, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Cho CH, Martinez A, Rugg-Gunn P, Brons G, Pedersen RA, 2009: Activin/Nodal signalling maintains pluripotency by controlling Nanog expression. Development 136, 13391349.
  • Vassiliev I, Vassilieva S, Beebe LF, Harrison SJ, McIlfatrick SM, Nottle MB, 2010: In vitro and in vivo characterization of putative porcine embryonic stem cells. Cell Reprogram 12, 223230.
  • Vejlsted M, Offenberg H, Thorup F, Maddox-Hyttel P, 2006: Confinement and clearance of OCT4 in the porcine embryo at stereomicroscopically defined stages around gastrulation. Mol Reprod Dev 73, 709718.
  • Wang J, Rao S, Chu J, Shen X, Levasseur DN, Theunissen TW, Orkin SH, 2006: A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444, 364368.
  • Wen J, Liu L, Song G, Tang B, Li Z, 2010: Biallele expression of PEG10 gene in primordial germ cells derived from day 27 porcine fetuses. Reprod Domest Anim 45, e375e381.
  • West FD, Terlouw SL, Kwon DJ, Mumaw JL, Dhara SK, Hasneen K, Dobrinsky JR, Stice SL, 2010: Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells produce chimeric offspring. Stem Cells Dev 19, 12111220.
  • Wolf XA, Serup P, Hyttel P, 2011: Three-dimensional localisation of NANOG, OCT4, and E-CADHERIN in porcine pre- and peri-implantation embryos. Dev Dyn 240, 204210.
  • Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, Cui C, Rao L, Li H, Gu Y, Dai H, Zhu H, Teng X, Cheng L, Xiao L, 2009: Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J Mol Cell Biol 1, 4654.
  • Xu RH, Peck RM, Li DS, Feng X, Ludwig T, Thomson JA, 2005: Basic FGF and suppression of BMP signaling sustain undifferentiated proliferation of human ES cells. Nat Methods 2, 185190.
  • Xu RH, Sampsell-Barron TL, Gu F, Root S, Peck RM, Pan G, Yu J, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Tian S, Stewart R, Thomson JA, 2008: NANOG is a direct target of TGFbeta/activin-mediated SMAD signaling in human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 3, 196206.
  • Yamaguchi S, Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T, 2005: Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr Patterns 5, 639646.
  • Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A, 2003: BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115, 281292.
  • Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A, 2008: The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519523.
  • Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA II, 2007: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 19171920.