SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • APL, 2010: APL industry survey 2010 [summary]. Available: http://www.australianpork.com.au/pages/images/APL_IndSurvey_Report_270511_Final%20(2)%20EXEC%20SUMMARY.pdf (assessed 10 May 2012).
  • Baxter EM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA, 2011: Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal 5, 580600.
  • Baxter EM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA, 2012: Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal 6, 96117.
  • Bonde M, Rousing TJ, Badsberg H, Sorensen JT, 2004: Associations between lying-down behaviour problems and body condition, limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commercial sow herds. Livest Prod Sci 87, 179187.
  • Boulot S, Courboulay V, Badouard B, Pellois H, Ramonet Y, 2011: La conduite des truies en groupes augmente-t-elle les risques de troubles de reproduction dan les élevages francais? Journ Rech Porcine Fr 43, 171178.
  • Broom DM, Mendl MT, Zanella AJ, 1995: A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim Sci 61, 369385.
  • Courboulay V, Gaudré D, 2002: Faut-il distribuer des aliments enrichis en fibres aux truies en groupe? Journ Rech Porcine Fr 34, 225232.
  • Courboulay V, Boulot S, Badouard B, 2010: Etat des lieux des systemes de logement en groupe des truies en france et resultats techniques. Association Francaise de Medecine Veterinaire Porcine, pp. 7.
  • Cronin GM, Barnett JL, Hodge FM, Smith JA, Mccallum TH, 1991: The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: cortisol responses of sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 32, 117127.
  • Damm BI, Heiskanen T, Pedersen LJ, Jørgensen E, Forkman B, 2010: Sow preferences for farrowing under a cover with and without access to straw. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126, 97104.
  • Hoving LL, Soede NM, Van Der Peet-Schwering CMC, Graat EAM, Feitsma H, Kemp B, 2011: An increased feed intake during early pregnancy improves sow body weight recovery and increases litter size in young sows. J Anim Sci 89, 35423550.
  • Hultén F, Dalin AM, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, 1995: Ovulation frequency among sows group-housed during late lactation. Anim Reprod Sci 39, 223233.
  • Hultén F, Wallenbeck A, Rydhmer L, 2006: Ovarian activity and oestrous signs among group-housed, lactating sows: influence of behaviour, environment and production. Reprod Domest Anim 41, 448454.
  • Jarvis S, Van Der Vegt BJ, Lawrence AB, Mclean KA, Deans LA, Chirnside J, Calvert SK, 2001: The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 71, 203216.
  • Kemp B, Soede NM, 2012: Should weaning be the start of the reproductive cycle in hyper prolific sows? A physiological view. Reprod Domest Anim 47 (Suppl. 4), 320326.
  • Kemp B, Soede NM, Langendijk P, 2005: Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in sows. Theriogenology 63, 643656.
  • KilBride AL, Gillman CE, Green LE, 2009: A cross sectional study of the prevalence, risk factors and population attributable fractions for limb and body lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms in England. BMC Vet Res 5, 30.
  • KilBride AL, Mendl M, Statham P, Held S, Harris M, Cooper S, Green LE, 2012: A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Prevent Vet Med 104, 281291.
  • Kirkwood R, Zanella AJ, 2005: Influence of gestation housing on sow welfare and productivity. National pork board final report.
  • Kongsted AG, 2004a: Reproduction performances and conditions of grouphoused non-lactating sows. PhD Thesis. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Kongsted AG, 2004b: Stress and fear as possible mediations of reproduction problems in group housed sows. A review. Acta Agric Scand Sect A, Anim Sci 54, 5866.
  • Kongsted AG, 2006: Relation between reproduction performance and indicators of feed intake, fear and social stress in commercial herds with group-housed non-lactating sows. Livest Sci 101, 4656.
  • Kongsted AG, Hermansen JE, 2009: Induction of lactational estrus in organic piglet production. Theriogenology 72, 11881194.
  • Langendijk P, Soede NM, Kemp B, 2000: Effects of boar contact and housing conditions on estrus expression in weaned sows. J Anim Sci 78, 871878.
  • Marchant JN, Rudd AR, Mendl MT, Broom DM, Meredith MJ, Corning S, Simmins PH, 2000: Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet Rec 147, 209214.
  • McGlone JJ, Borell VEH, Deen J, Johnson AK, Levis DG, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Morrow JL, Reeves D, Salak-Johnson JL, Sundberg PL, 2004: Compilation of the scientific literatures comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behavior, performance and health. Prof Anim Sci 20, 105117.
  • Munsterhjelm C, Valros A, Heinonen M, Hälli O, Siljander-Rasi H, Peltoniemi OAT, 2010: Environmental enrichment in early life affects cortisol patterns in growing pigs. Animal 4, 242249.
  • Mwanza AM, Englund P, Kindahl H, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, 2000: Effects of post- ovulatory food deprivation on the hormonal profiles, activity of the oviduct and ova transport in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 59, 185199.
  • Oliviero C, Heinonen M, Valros A, Hälli O, Peltoniemi OAT, 2008: Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim Reprod Sci 105, 365377.
  • Oliviero C, Heinonen M, Valros A, Peltoniemi OAT, 2010: Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Anim Reprod Sci 119, 8591.
  • Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Mendl M, Held S, Gerrits W, Van Den Brand H, Kemp B, 2010: Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet performance before and after weaning. J Anim Sci 88, 35543562.
  • Oostindjer M, Van Den Brand H, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE, 2011: Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet behaviour before and after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 134, 3141.
  • Pajor EA, Kramer DL, Fraser D, 2000: Regulation of contact with offspring by domestic sows: temporal patterns and individual variation. Ethology 106, 3751.
  • Pajor EA, Weary DM, Caceres C, Fraser D, Kramer DL, 2002: Alternative housing for sows and litters part 3. Effects of piglet diet quality and sow-controlled housing on performance and behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 76, 267277.
  • Pearce GP, Pearce AN, 1992: Contact with a sow in oestrus or a mature boar stimulates the onset of oestrus in weaned sows. Vet Rec 130, 59.
  • Pedersen LJ, Rydhmer L, Neil M, Dalin AM, 1998a: Oestrus behaviour of group housed sows in relation to individual competitive success. Proceeding 32nd Congress International Society of Applied Ethology, Clermont-Ferrand, France, pp. 53.
  • Pedersen LJ, Studnitz M, Jensen KH, Giersing AM, 1998b: Suckling behaviour of piglets in relation to accessibility to the sow and the presence of foreign litters. Appl Anim Behav Sci 58, 267279.
  • Pedersen LJ, Heiskanen T, Damm BI, 2003: Sexual motivation in relation to social rank in pair-housed sows. Anim Reprod Sci 75, 3953.
  • Pedersen LJ, Berg P, Jørgensen G, Andersen IL, 2011: Neonatal piglet traits of importance for survival in crates and indoor pens. J Anim Sci 89, 12071218.
  • Quesnel H, 2009: Nutritional and lactational effects on follicular development in pigs. In: Rodriguez-Martinez H, Vallet JL, Ziecik AJ (eds), Control of Pig Reproduction VIII, Vol VIII. Nothingham University Press, AB, Canada, pp. 121134.
  • Razdan P, Tummaruk P, Kindahl H, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Hulten F, Einarsson S, 2004: Hormonal profiles and embryo survival of sows subjected to induced stress during days 13 and 14 of pregnancy. Anim Reprod Sci 81, 295312.
  • Sørensen G, Thorup F, 2003: Energy supply in the implantation period. Meddelse nr. 618. Landsudvalget for Svin.
  • Spoolder HAM, Geudeke MJ, Van Der Peet-Schwering CMC, Soede NM, 2009: Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: a review of success and risk factors. Livest Sci 125, 114.
  • Thodberg K, Jensen KH, Herskin MS, 2002: Nest building and farrowing in sows: relation to the reaction pattern during stress, farrowing environment and experience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 77, 2142.
  • Tsuma VT, Einarsson S, Madej A, Lundeheim N, Rojkittikhun T, 1996: Effect of food deprivation during early pregnancy on endocrine changes in primiparous sows. Anim Reprod Sci 41, 267278.
  • Turner AI, Tilbrook AJ, 2006: Stress, cortisol and reproduction in female pigs. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 62, 191203.
  • Tuyttens FAM, Struelens E, Van Gansbeke S, Ampe B, 2008: Factors influencing farmers’ responses to welfare legislation: a case study of gestation sow housing in Flanders (Belgium). Livest Sci 116, 289299.
  • Tuyttens FAM, Van Gansbeke S, Ampe B, 2011: Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows. J Anim Sci 89, 845855.
  • Van Der Mheen HW, Spoolder HAM, Kiezebrink MC, 2003: Stabiele of wisselgroepen voor drachtige zeugen [static or dynamic groups for pregnant sows]. Livestock Research, Wageningen UR, Lelystad.
  • Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Kemp B, Binnendijk GP, Den Hartog LA, Spoolder HAM, Verstegen MWA, 2003: Performance of sows fed high levels of nonstarch polysaccharides during gestation and lactation over three parities. J Anim Sci 81, 22472258.
  • Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Hoofs AIJ, Soede NM, Spoolder HAM, Vereijken P, 2009: Group Housing of Sows During Early Gestation. Livestock Research, Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands, pp. 91.
  • Van Wettere WHEJ, Pain SJ, Stott PG, Hughes PE, 2008: Mixing gilts in early pregnancy does not affect embryo survival. Anim Reprod Sci 104, 382388.
  • Vanheukelom V, Driessen B, Geers R, 2012: The effects of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of suckling piglets and lactating sows: a review. Livest Sci 143, 116131.
  • Varley MA, Stedman R, 1994: Stress and reproduction. In: Cole DJA, Wiseman J, Varley MA (eds), Principles of Pig Science. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp. 277296.
  • Weary DM, Pajor EA, Bonenfant M, Fraser D, Kramer DL, 2002: Alternative housing for sows and litters Part 4. Effects of sow-controlled housing combined with a communal piglet area on pre- and post-weaning behaviour and performance. Appl Anim Behav Sci 76, 279290.
  • Weber R, Keil NM, Horat R, 2007: Piglet mortality on farms using farrowing systems with or without crates. Anim Welf 16, 277279.
  • Weber R, Keil NM, Fehr M, Horat R, 2009: Factors affecting piglet mortality in loose farrowing systems on commercial farms. Livest Sci 124, 216222.
  • Wientjes JGM, Soede NM, Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Van Den Brand H, Kemp B, 2012: Piglet uniformity and mortality in large organic litters: effects of parity and pre-mating diet composition. Livest Sci 144, 218229.
  • Wischner D, Kemper N, Krieter J, 2009: Nest-building behaviour in sows and consequences for pig husbandry. Livest Sci 124, 18.