Conflicts of Interest
Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
Version of Record online: 21 DEC 2011
© 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 27, Issue 1, pages 51–58, January 2012
How to Cite
Li, L., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Li, X., Jiao, B. and Kang, T. (2012), Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 27: 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06947.x
The authors disclose no conflicts
- Issue online: 21 DEC 2011
- Version of Record online: 21 DEC 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 17 OCT 2011 10:44AM EST
- Accepted for publication 8 September 2011.
- hepatocellular carcinoma;
- radiofrequency ablation;
Background and Aim: To evaluate the evidence comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (RES) on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using meta-analytical techniques.
Methods: Literature search was undertaken until March 2011 to identify comparative studies evaluating survival rates, recurrence rates, and complications. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated with either the fixed or random effect model.
Results: These studies included a total of 877 patients: 441 treated with RFA and 436 treated with RES. The overall survival was significantly higher in patients treated with RES than RFA at 1, 3 and 5 years (respectively: OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29–0.86; OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.94; OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45–0.84). In the RES group the 1, 3, and 5 years recurrence-free survival rates were significantly higher than the RFA group (respectively: OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44–0.97; OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47–0.89; OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35–0.77). RFA had a higher rate of local recurrence (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.03–8.20). For tumors ≤ 3 cm RES was better than RFA in the 3-year overall survival rates (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16–0.89).
Conclusions: Surgical resection was superior to RFA in the treatment of HCC. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence.