Get access

Socio-cultural perceptions of sudden infant death syndrome among migrant Indian mothers

Authors

  • Henna Aslam,

    1. Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool BC and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lynn Kemp,

    Corresponding author
    1. Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool BC and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Elizabeth Harris,

    1. Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool BC and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Emilee Gilbert

    1. Gender, Culture and Health: PsyHealth, School of Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South DC, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Dr Lynn Kemp, Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Liverpool Hospital, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871, Australia. Fax: +61 2 9612 0762; email: l.kemp@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

Aim:  To explore socio-cultural influences on migrant mother decisions and beliefs regarding co-sleeping as a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Methods:  Semi-structured interviews with five Indian-born women in a socio-economically disadvantaged suburb in the south-west of Sydney were conducted between September and December 2007. Transcripts were analysed using principles of discourse analysis.

Results:  Discourse analysis revealed that SIDS-related decisions and beliefs about co-sleeping as a risk factor for SIDS are constructed amid competing discourses of motherhood and child health. Mothers are either actively or unconsciously deciding how they negotiate or resist dominant Western discourses of motherhood and child health to make ‘the best’ health-related decisions for their children. Participants resisted acknowledging child sleep practices recommended by health practitioners, particularly recommendations to put to sleep the baby in its own cot. This resistance was expressed by constructing messages as ‘inapplicable’ and ‘inappropriate’. Co-sleeping was constructed as a highly valued practice for its physical and social benefits to the child, mother and family by facilitating child security, breastfeeding, bonding and family connectedness.

Conclusion:  This study illustrates how decisions and behaviour are shaped by socio-cultural influences embedded in discourses and context. It also shows that in-depth investigation through a social constructivist lens is particularly useful for investigating influences on knowledge acquisition, interpretation and implementation among migrant groups. A greater appreciation of the social meanings and ideologies attached to behaviours can help to ensure that the correct messages reach the correct populations, and that child health outcomes can be achieved and maintained both for overseas and Australian-born populations.

Ancillary