• coping strategies/methods;
  • hospital related fears;
  • pre-school-aged children;
  • qualitative research


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References

Aim:  The aim of this study was to describe the child-reported coping strategies for hospital-related fears in 4–6-year-old children.

Method:  The data were collected by semi-structured interviews of 4–6-year-old volunteering children (n= 82) in Finland. Thirty-four children were interviewed in hospital, and 48 in kindergarten. The children were chosen through a purposive sampling method, in which volunteers were asked to take part in the study. The data were analysed with quantitative and qualitative methods.

Results:  The most frequent child-reported coping strategies were: the presence of parents and other family members (81/517, 15.7%), the help of the hospital personnel (58/517, 11.2%), positive images and humour (57/517, 11%), play (57/517, 11%) and the child's own safety toy (45/517, 8.7%). The children interviewed in hospital mentioned significantly more often play (P= 0.000) as their coping strategy than children interviewed in a kindergarten. Children interviewed in kindergarten expressed significantly more often the presence of parents (P= 0.032) and the help of the doctor (P= 0.012) as their coping strategy than the children interviewed in the hospital.

Conclusions:  The results showed that children have many coping strategies, especially ones in which the children themselves play an active role. Besides, the traditional methods for alleviating fear, children need possibilities to use coping methods in which they have an active role giving them a feeling of some control over the hospital environment and medical procedures.

There are no previous research data on the coping strategies, which pre-school-aged children use to deal with fears related to hospitals and medical procedures, as reported by the children themselves. However, this subject is important because pre-school-aged children may experience several hospital-related fears,1,2 and interventions designed to help the children to cope with their fears are not only likely to decrease their stress at the time of hospitalisation, but are also likely to influence their development3 and well-being later in life.4–7

According to information obtained from the parents and the hospital personnel, the presence of supportive parents during the child's hospitalisation,1,8–10 during painful procedures11,12 and during the day surgery process13 helped children to cope with separation anxiety. Sibling relationships also helped to alleviate the fear caused by separation.8 In the absence of parents, children resort to the nursing staff.12,14,15 When the nursing staff gave honest information and discussed the hospital experience with the children and the children were given time and the chance to participate in decisions, all helped them to cope with their fears of surgery and general anaesthesia.4,16–19 Moreover, methods such as behavioural modelling and reinforcement procedures for ‘bravery training’, including parent training,20,21 music and art therapy,14,22–24 and therapeutic play17,25–28 have been found to alleviate children's fears of medical procedures.

The aim of this study was to describe the amount and quality of child-reported coping strategies for hospital-related fears in 4–6-year-old children. We also wanted to determine whether the children being treated in hospital expressed more or different coping methods, compared with the children who were interviewed at kindergarten. The coping strategies can be problem-oriented (the child tries to eliminate the fear by seeking information, solving problems or asking adults for help), emotion-oriented (the child handles the fear in order to attain balance), and function-oriented (the child tackles the fear by withdrawal, aggressive behaviour, hyperactivity or playing).29–31 In our study, coping strategies are defined as the child's active attempts at cognitive, emotional and functional actions to master her/his hospital-related fears.

Key Points

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References
  • 1
    Pre-school-aged children report many coping strategies, especially strategies in which the children themselves play an active role.
  • 2
    The children interviewed in hospital mentioned significantly more often both play and positive images and humour as their coping strategy than children interviewed in kindergarten.
  • 3
    Children interviewed in kindergarten expressed significantly more often than hospitalised children the presence of parents and other family members, as well as the help of the doctor as their coping strategy.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References

A qualitative study was conducted in 2004–2006. The data was collected using a semi-structured interview that was supported by pictures, and analysed by inductive content analysis. The sample consisted of voluntary participants: 82 4–6-year-old children, living in the metropolitan area of Finland (population about 1.5 million).

Data collection

A purposive sampling method was used. A purposive sample consists of information-rich cases that manifest the phenomenon of interest.32,33 The criteria for participation in the study were: age 4–6 years, the child's ability to communicate in Finnish, and the child's normal developmental stage (evaluated by kindergarten and hospital personnel). The nursing staff gave all the parents whose 4–6-year-old child was on the ward or in the kindergarten during the period of the study, an information letter of the study with a request for written permission to interview their child. All those children were interviewed whose parents gave written permission – and the child verbal consent – to participate in the study.

The interviews were carried out by 19 trained interviewers who were graduating nurses in their final semester. One of the authors (M.S.) supervised and standardised the interview process by training the interviewers in the ethics and the trustworthiness of interviewing children, by requiring pilot interviews, and by listening to the recordings of the interviews.

The data were gathered by a semi-structured child interview, which was supported by pictures. The topics and issues to be covered were specified in advance as the themes of the interview, but the interviewer decided the sequence and wording of the questions in the course of the interview.32 The research themes were formulated on the basis of earlier studies of coping.29–31 The themes were: (i) the problem-oriented coping strategies, (ii) the emotion-oriented coping strategies, and (iii) the function-oriented strategies for coping with hospital-related fears in pre-school-aged children. The topics of the pictures consisted of children in the hospital environment. The pictures helped the children to become interested in and concentrate on the conversation, connect their own experiences to the topic and express their thoughts.34–37

The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. The length of the transcribed interviews ranged from 1 to 13 pages, and the interviews lasted from 15 min to 1 h.

Data analysis

All interview data were analysed by inductive content analysis (by one of the authors: M.S.). Inductive content analysis involves identifying, coding, categorising, and classifying the primary patterns in the data. Each category was named using content-characteristic words, subcategories with similar coping strategies were grouped together as categories, and categories were classified into 14 main categories.32,33,38 The data were entered onto a SPSS database and subjected to frequency distributions, and chi-square analysis. To test the inter-rater reliability of the content analysis 10% (n= 9) of the interviews were analysed by both M.S. and S.S. (one of the authors) and Cohen's Kappa values were calculated.39 The kappa value was 95%.

Ethical considerations

The hospital district's ethics committee and the City Social Services Department both granted their approval for the study. Interviews proceeded on the child's terms and the parents could follow the interview if they wished. The participants' identity was protected and the information given by the child was processed confidentially.33,40


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References

Thirty-four children were interviewed in hospital in two paediatric surgical wards. These children were admitted to hospital because of a short-term illness or a single operation. Forty-eight children were interviewed in six kindergartens. The data included 43 girls and 39 boys. Twenty-five of the children were 4 years old, 20 were 5 years old, and 37 were 6 years old.

The number of coping strategies

The data included a total of 517 expressions of coping (Table 1). The children expressed 75 different types of coping strategies. The number of child-reported coping strategies among children interviewed in kindergartens ranged from one to 12, and in hospital from one to 23. Altogether 22/82, 27% children expressed 1–3 coping strategies, 28/82, 34% expressed 4–6 strategies, 18/82, 22% expressed 7–9 strategies, and 14/82, 17% expressed more than nine coping strategies related to hospital fears (Table 1).

Table 1.  The number of coping strategies expressed by the children in hospital and in kindergarten
The number of coping strategiesHospitalKindergartenTotal
over 99265101417

The contents of the coping strategies

Most of the children expressed the presence of parents (57/82, 70%) as their coping strategy. The next larges categories consisted of the child's own toy, the care of the nurse, play and the presence of grandparents or other adults important to the child.

When the coping strategies were categorised according to their contents into 14 categories, the largest category was the presence of parents or other family members. The coping strategies in which the children described how the fear was alleviated by the proximity of supporting family members were placed in this category. The second largest category was resorting to the help of the hospital personnel. The next largest categories were positive images and humour, for example, thinking about and expecting nice, happy things, along with play, into which both the child's free play, and for example, watching television were placed. The coping strategies concerning the child's own safety toy were placed in a category of their own (Table 2).

Table 2.  The number of coping strategies expressed by the children (N= 82)
Coping strategyThe number of expressions nTotal (%)
The presence of parents and other family members 81 (15.7%)
 Presence of parents54
 Presence of grandparents or other family members16
 Petting, sitting in lap8
 Holding hands3
The help of the hospital personnel 58 (11.2%)
 Nurse's nursing19
 Nurse's help15
 Nurse's consolation4
 Doctor's curing8
 Doctor's help6
 Doctor's consolation5
 Looking at the doctor1
Positive images and humour 57 (11%)
 Thinking of something nice12
 Waiting to get home11
 Waiting to get better10
 Imaginative play8
 Waiting for the parents to come for a visit7
 Changing the frightening matter into something nice4
 Thinking of what to do once back home1
 Role play1
Play 57 (11%)
 Watching television, games9
 Games, computer games8
 Reading, books8
 Hobby crafts, drawing8
 Visiting the play room7
The child's own safety toy 45 (8.7%)
 Child's own toy28
 Bedtime toy or other safety object10
 Hugging one's own toy or otherwise holding it7
The action that rejects fear 34 (6.6%)
 Looking away8
 Closing one's eyes6
Resting and calming down 33 (6.3%)
 Lying down, resting9
 Sitting still7
 Calming down7
 Waking up1
The alleviation of pain and the symptoms of the disease 32 (6.2%)
 Alleviating pain10
 Staying still, immobility7
 Expressing the pain3
 Controlling one's own body to alleviate the pain3
Active problem solving 29 (5.6%)
 Asking questions7
 Following the instructions5
 Finding out things5
 Absorbing information3
 Facing up to the frightening situation3
 Possibility to participate2
 Asking reasons2
 Keeping eyes open1
 Preparing oneself for the situation1
Expressing fear and asking for help 28 (5.4%)
 Telling adults about the fear8
 Asking for help from adults2
The acceptance of fear 22 (4.3%)
 Consoling oneself9
 Getting used to the situation5
 Accepting the fear3
 Thinking about the frightening situation3
 Accepting the facts2
Thoughts that reject fear 20 (3.9%)
 Refusing to think about the frightening matter8
 Denying the fear6
 Transferring the fear to other children1
Material objects that create pleasure 11 (2.1%)
 Getting a reward4
 Beautiful things in the surroundings2
 Food, eating1
Meeting friends and siblings 10 (1.9%)
 Meeting a friend4
 Meeting a sibling3
 Meeting a new friend2
 Thinking about a friend1
Total517517 (100%)

Approximately 30 comments were placed in the category for action that rejects fear, which reflected the children's own efforts to resist the fear-inducing event or to escape the situation. The children mentioned rest and calming down, along with the alleviating of pain and expressing fear and the symptoms of the disease as almost equally significant strategies for coping. The latter category included both the nursing offered by the hospital personnel and the children's own actions to alleviate the pain and the symptoms. The children reported that they can also manage hospital fears by being courageous and active themselves, and by trying to familiarises themselves with the event that causes fear. Expressions reflecting these kinds of coping strategies were placed in the category of problem solving. Expressing fear and asking for help are also children's ways of managing fear.

Coping strategies in which the children said they managed their fear, for example, by comforting themselves or by getting used to the situation were placed in the category of acceptance of fear. In the category of thoughts rejecting fear were placed the expressions that described the children's own efforts to reject fear through thinking. The smallest categories describing coping strategies were formed of two categories: the category of material objects that create pleasure, and the category of meeting friends and siblings.

The mean of the number of coping strategies expressed by girls was 6 and by boys 7. Boys expressed statistically significantly more often playing and games (χ2-test, P= 0.074), and girls the help of the doctor (P= 0.011).

Differences in coping strategies between children interviewed at kindergarten and at hospital

Children in kindergarten (n= 48) expressed a total of 320 coping strategies, with the number of expressed ways of coping ranging from 1 to 12. The mean number of coping strategies expressed by children in kindergarten was 6.7. Children in hospital (n= 34) expressed 197 ways of coping. The number of strategies ranged from 1 to 23, with a mean of 5.8.

The children interviewed in hospital mentioned statistically significantly more often play (P= 0.000), their own safety toy (P= 0.044) and thoughts rejecting fear (P= 0.052) as their coping strategy than children interviewed in kindergarten (Table 2). Children interviewed in kindergarten expressed statistically significantly more often than hospitalised children the presence of parents (P= 0.032) and the help of the doctor (P= 0.012) as their strategy for coping. Children interviewed in hospital mentioned somewhat more often than children in kindergarten, positive images and humour as their coping strategy (Table 3).

Table 3.  The expressions of coping strategies of the children in hospital and in kindergarten
Categories of copingChildren in hospital (n= 34)Children in kinder-garten (n= 48)Chi-square-valueP-value
The presence of parents and other family members22 (65%)36 (75%)8.7880.032
The help of the nurse13 (38%)17 (35%)1.2800.734
The help of the doctor2 (6%)16 (33%)8.8680.012
Positive images and humour18 (53%)16 (33%)9.0060.109
The child's own safety toy19 (56%)15 (31%)8.0960.044
Play20 (59%)7 (15%)20.1630.000
The action that rejects fear12 (35%)12 (25%)5.8670.209
Rest and calming down13 (38%)10 (21%)4.1280.248
Expressing fear and asking for help12 (35%)10 (21%)3.9930.262
The alleviation of pain and the symptoms of the disease10 (29%)10 (21%)1.9030.754
Active problem solving9 (26%)11 (23%)1.5780.813
The acceptance of fear9 (26%)8 (17%)3.3010.192
Thoughts that reject fear9 (26%)5 (10%)7.7100.052
Material objects that create pleasure6 (18%)5 (10%)0.8960.334
Meeting friends and siblings6 (18%)4 (8%)1.6120.204


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References

The present study described the ways in which pre-school-aged children cope with their fears related to hospitalisation and medical procedures as reported by the children themselves. The results offer new information on the coping strategies that matter most to children themselves. In addition to the support of adults, free play, watching television, various games and hobby crafts, and the child's own safety toy are all essential strategies for coping among pre-school-aged children in hospital. Equally important are the creation of positive images, maintaining them, and humour.

The results showed that children have many coping strategies, especially strategies in which the children themselves play an active role. Of all the 517 coping strategies expressed by the children, in only 150/517, 29% the children played a passive role (the presence of family members, the help of the hospital personnel, and material objects). In the other 367/517, 71% expressions describing coping, the children themselves played an active role. Similar findings were not evident in earlier studies concerning children's coping with hospital-related fear. This may reflect the fact that in the earlier studies the children themselves were not asked about their coping strategies.9–13

According to our study, the number and content of coping strategies used by healthy children and children in hospital differed. Children interviewed in kindergarten expressed more coping strategies than sick children. It is possible that admittance to hospital and the sickness caused stress and decreased children's coping strategy reporting. On the other hand, in hospital the children may have learnt which coping strategies helped them and which did not and they reported only the effective ones. Healthy children said more often than hospitalised children that they cope with their fear with the help of their parents and the hospital personnel. Instead, the hospitalised children relied often to the coping strategies with their own active role.

The results confirm earlier findings of the significance of the presence of parents in the coping of the children.1,8 Resorting to the nurse,12 receiving information,4,16 play25,28 and positive visual images14 have previously been shown to alleviate the fear of young children. Moreover, expressing fear, rejecting and denying it are known to alleviate fears and pain in children.41 Several coping strategies, for example, playing and crying, may probably act both as an expression of fear and a coping strategy, a fact that has also been noted previously.42

This study differs from earlier studies because of the aim, the informants and the data collection method. Earlier studies, in which the data have mainly been collected by observing the children or interviewing adults, have focused on the coping of children, for example, through the day surgery process, painful procedures or the hospital experience of children in general. In this study, we wanted to look more deeply at the child's own expressions about coping with hospital-related fears. It can be assumed that the children described the methods that are most effective for them. We interviewed both children in hospital and in kindergartens, so it was possible to describe the differences between these children in the results. Our results emphasised the importance of the active part played by the child in coping, as well as the fact that essential coping strategies are those which are part of the child's normal activities and familiar to them from their everyday life.

Limitations of the study

In the present study, volunteers were recruited for the study, which limits generalisation of the results to the general population of 4–6-year-old children. Differences in the children's personality and developmental stage might have decreased the reliability of the results. However, thanks to the pictures used, it was easy for the children to identify their coping strategies and discuss their own thoughts, emotions and actions.

The use of several interviewers at the data collection stage may decrease the trustworthiness and reliability of the results, as well as the different circumstances of each interview, and the possible contribution of parents and nurses to the interview. However, the trustworthiness of the data collection was assured by training the interviewers in interviewing children, by requiring pilot interviews and by giving systematic instructions about the interview process in advance through lectures and individual instruction (M.S.). All the interviews were based on standardised themes, and were supported by the interview guide, which ensured that the same basic line of inquiry were pursued with each child.32 Before analysing the data the researcher (M.S.) listened to the recordings and checked that the transcripts had been made reliably, reading the transcribed material several times in order to become immersed in the data.33,43 The inter-rater reliability of the content analysis was found to be good, 95%.39

In this study, one of the aims was to give the pre-school-aged children themselves the opportunity to discuss their coping strategies. Neither the earlier hospital experiences of the children nor the socio-economic background of their families was controlled, which again may limit the extrapolation of the results. However, the participants represented common Finnish children, interviewed in public kindergartens and in a university hospital. In Finland all children have the right to attend a public day nursery by law.44 Kindergartens were located in low, high, and middle socio-economic districts of the city and the families' income levels, as well as the parents' educational background fluctuated from high to low levels.

The phenomenon of coping with hospital-related fear was examined from the perspective of both children interviewed in hospital and kindergarten, in order to determine whether there were differences in coping strategies between the two groups. All the children interviewed in kindergarten had experiences of health care services at least through well baby clinic visits with shots and health inspections, and their images of coping with hospital-related fears were based on these and possibly other doctor visit experiences. According to the qualitative research tradition, the informants always find their experience real, regardless of the basis of the experience.45

Conclusions and clinical implications

In this study, the children mentioned a great variety of coping strategies. Adults should encourage and support children to use these strategies when the children confront hospitalisation and/or medical procedures. It would also be of great importance to know which methods are important to each individual child. When the child is listened to, she/he is given the opportunity to report her/his own ways of coping in the stressful situation, and thus she/he can be given the most appropriate support. Qualitative research studies have demonstrated that very young children can provide important insights into their health experiences, so their views can and ought to be taken seriously.46,47 It might be useful to create a questionnaire or a list of coping methods for the parents and the child, and with its help find out the most effective way to support the child.

Children have been found to benefit from the teaching of cognitive-behavioural coping skills. Parents also need guidance in supporting the child's coping skills.20 Whether children should be taught several different coping methods or only a few should be studied. Our results suggest that children already have many coping mechanisms in which they play an active role, and that these mechanisms should be first evaluated and then supported.

The results show that besides the traditional strategies for alleviating fear, the children need methods that they can use when they need them, that have an effect on their emotions and cognitions, and are suitable for their developmental stage. It is important for the children that they can use coping strategies that give them an active role. These methods alleviate the fear of the children, give them a feeling of control over the nursing situation, and the opportunity to participate in their own treatment.48


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References

This study was supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Key Points
  4. Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgement
  8. References
  • 1
    Rennick JE, Morin I, Kim D, Johnston CC, Dougherty G, Platt R. Identifying children at high risk for psychological sequelae after pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 5: 35863.
  • 2
    McGrath P, Huff N. What is it?’: findings on preschoolers' responses to play with medical equipment. Child Care Health Dev. 2001; 27: 45162.
  • 3
    Aley KE. Developmental approach to pediatric transplantation. Prog. Transplant. 2002; 12: 8691.
  • 4
    Justus R, Wyles D, Wilson J, Rode D, Walther V, Lim-Sulit N. Preparing children and families for surgery: Mount Sinai's multidisciplinary perspective. Pediatr. Nurs. 2006; 32: 3543.
  • 5
    Coyne I. Children's experiences of hospitalization. J. Child Health Care 2006; 10: 32636.
  • 6
    Kopec J, Sayre E. Traumatic experiences in childhood and the risk of arthritis: a prospective cohort study. Can. J. Public Health 2004; 95: 3615.
  • 7
    Rees G, Gledhill J, Garralda ME, Nadel S. Psychiatric outcome following paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission: a cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 160714.
  • 8
    Foley J. The effects of hospitalisation on children. Nurs. Rev. (Ireland) 2000; 18: 45.
  • 9
    Robinson JR, Rankin JL, Drotar D. Quality of attachment as a predictor of maternal visitation to young hospitalized children. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1996; 21: 40117.
  • 10
    LeRoy S, Elixson M, O'Brien P, Tong E, Turpin S, Uzark K. Recommendations for preparing children and adolescents for invasive cardiac procedures. Cir, Am Heart Assoc. Sci. Statement 2003; 108: 255064.
  • 11
    Pinto JP, Barbosa VL. Maternal-infant bonding and the mother's participation during venipuncture: a psychoanalytic perspective. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem 2007; 15: 1505.
  • 12
    Jan MM. Neurological examination of difficult and poorly cooperative children. J. Child Neurol. 2007; 22: 120913.
  • 13
    Vagnoli L, Caprill A, Messeri S Clown doctors as a treatment for preoperative anxiety in children: a randomized, prospective study. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 5637.
  • 14
    Favara-Scacco C, Smirne G, Schiliro G, Di Cataldo A. Art therapy as support for children with leukemia during painful procedures. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 2001; 36: 47480.
  • 15
    Ivanoff P, Astedt-Kurki P, Laijarvi H. Pre-school children's experiences of hospital fear [Finnish, english abstract. Hoitotiede 1999; 11: 27281.
  • 16
    Dreger V, Tremback T. Management of preoperative anxiety in children. AORN J. 2006; 84: 77890.
  • 17
    Ziegler DB, Prior MM. Preparation for surgery and adjustment to hospitalization. Nurs Clin North Am. 1994; 29: 65569.
  • 18
    Lindberg S, Von Post I. The perioperative dialogue from the perspective of children with special needs. Vård I Norden. Nurs Sci Res Nord. Ctries. 2005; 25: 4852.
  • 19
    Lindberg S, Von Post I. From fear to confidence: children with a fear of general anaesthesia and the perioperative dialogue for dental treatment. J. Adv. Perioper. Care 2006; 2: 14351.
  • 20
    Zelikovsky N, Rodrigue J, Gidycz C, Davis M. Cognitive behavioral and behavioral interventions help young children cope during a voiding cystourethrogram. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2000; 25: 53643.
  • 21
    Hawkins NE. Bravery training: an approach to desensitizing young children to fears encountered in the hospital setting. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1991; 72: 697700.
  • 22
    Gagnon J, Bouchard F, Landry M, Belles-Isles M. Implementing a hospital-based animal therapy program for children with cancer: a descriptive study. Can. Oncol. Nurs. J. 2004; 14: 21722.
  • 23
    DeLoach W. Procedural-support music therapy in the healthcare setting: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2005; 20: 27684.
  • 24
    Caprilli S, Anastasi F, Grotto RP, Abeti MS, Messeri A. Interactive music as a treatment for pain and stress in children during venipuncture: a randomized prospective study. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2007; 28: 399403.
  • 25
    Shipton H. Playing doctors and nurses take the fear out of hospital. Nurs. Times 1999; 95: 489.
  • 26
    Bowmer N. Therapeutic play and the impact on anxiety in hospitalized children. Ky. Nurse 2002; 50: 15.
  • 27
    Loranger N. Play intervention strategies for the Hispanic toddler with separation anxiety. Pediatr. Nurs. 1992; 18: 5715.
  • 28
    Windich-Biermeier A, Sjoberg I, Dale JC, Eshelman D, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction on pain, fear, and distress during venous port access and venipuncture in children and adolescents with cancer. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2007; 24: 819.
  • 29
    Norman SE, Parker JDA. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990; 58: 84454.
  • 30
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1984.
  • 31
    Maes S, Leventhal H, De Ridder DTD. Coping with chronic diseases. In: ZeidnerM, EndlerNS, eds. Handbook of Coping. Theory, Research, Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996; 22151.
  • 32
    Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990; 234, 343–9, 462.
  • 33
    Burns N, Grove S. Understanding Nursing Research, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003; 374, 378–91.
  • 34
    Carney T, Bishop E, Kerr C et al. Children's views of hospitalization: an exploratory study of data collection. J. Child Health Care 2003; 7: 2740.
  • 35
    Deering C, Cod D. Communicating with children and adolescents. Am. J. Nurs. 2002; 102: 3441.
  • 36
    Styles M, Arizpe E. A Gorilla with grandpa's eyes’: how children interpret visual texts. A case study of Anthony Browne's ‘Zoo. Child. Lit. Edu. 2001; 32: 26181.
  • 37
    Doverborg E, Pramlin S. Att förstå barns tankar. Metodik för barnintervjuer, 3rd edn. Tukholma: Liber AB, 2000.
  • 38
    Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008; 62: 10715.
  • 39
    Burns N, Grove S. The Practice of Nursing Research. Conduct, Critique, & Utilization, 4th edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saundres Company, 2001.
  • 40
    Munhall P. Etical considerations in qualitative research. In: MunhallP, Boyd C. Nursing Research. A Qualitative Perspective. New York: National League for Nursing, 1999; 395408.
  • 41
    Wennström L, Hallgerg R-M, Bergh I. Use of perioperative dialogue with children undergoing day surgery. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008; 62: 96106.
  • 42
    Wennström L, Bergh I. Bodily and verbal expressions of postoperative symptoms in 3- to 6-year-old boys. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2008; 23: 6576.
  • 43
    Cohen MZ, Knafl KA. Evaluating qualitative research. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. In: MunhallP, Boyd C. Nursing Research. A Qualitative Pespective, 2nd edn. New York: National League for Nursing Press, 1993; 47692.
  • 44
    Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Act of the Child's Day Nursery 1973/36. Available from:[accessed 18 August 2009.
  • 45
    Crotty M. Phenomenology and Nursing Research. Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone, 1996; 1219.
  • 46
    Irwin LG, Johnson J. Interviewing young children: explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qual. Health Res. 2005; 15: 82131.
  • 47
    Miller S. Analysis of phenomenological data generated with children as participants. Nurse Res. 2003; 10: 6882.
  • 48
    Salanterä S. Caring for Children in Pain – Nursing Knowledge, Activities and Outcomes. Painosalama Oy, Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, 1999.