• Please log in or register to access this feature.

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Vohr BR, Allen M. Extreme prematurity – the continuing dilemma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 352: 712.
  • 2
    Steinkuller PG, Du L, Gilbert C, Foster A, Collins ML, Coats DK. Childhood blindness. J. AAPOS 1999; 3: 2632.
  • 3
    Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull. World Health Organ. 2010; 88: 318.
  • 4
    Leversen KT, Sommerfelt K, Ronnestad A et al. Predicting neurosensory disabilities at two years of age in a national cohort of extremely premature infants. Early Hum. Dev. 2010; 86: 5816.
  • 5
    Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 5726.
  • 6
    Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Opthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity (Erratum). Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1468.
  • 7
    Tracy SK, Tracy MB, Dean J, Laws P, Sullivan E. Spontaneous preterm birth of liveborn infants in women at low risk in Australia over 10 years: a population-based study. BJOG 2007; 114: 7315.
  • 8
    Laws P, Li Z, Sullivan EA. Australia's mothers and babies 2008. Perinatal Statistics Series no. 24. Cat. no. PER 50. Canberra: AIHW. 2010. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/[accessed 22 August 2011].
  • 9
    ANZNN (Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network). Report of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network 2006. Sydney, ANZNN. 2009. Available from: http://www.npsu.unsw.edu.au/PRERUWeb.nsf/resources/last5yrs/$file/ANZNN+2006.pdf[accessed 22 August 2011].
  • 10
    KEMH. Retinopathy of prematurity. NCCU Clin Guidelines . 2006; 1–2. Available from: http://www.kemh.health.wa.gov.au/services/nccu/guidelines/documents/7397.pdf[updated August 2006, accessed April 2011].
  • 11
    RPAH. Retinopathy of Prematurity. RPA Newborn Care Guidelines . 2006. Available from: http://www.sswahs.nsw.gov.au/rpa/neonatal/[updated 24 August 2009, accessed April 2011].
  • 12
    Laws DE, Morton C, Weindling M, Clark D. Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 4258.
  • 13
    Richter GM, Sun G, Lee TC et al. Speed of telemedicine versus ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 148: 13642 e132.
  • 14
    Dai S, Chow K, Vincent A. Efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2010; 39: 239.
  • 15
    Pick ZS, Stewart J, Elder MJ. The New Zealand ophthalmology workforce 2008. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2008; 36: 7626.
  • 16
    Bellan L, Buske L. Ophthalmology human resource projections: are we heading for a crisis in the next 15 years? Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 42: 348.
  • 17
    Kemper AR, Freedman SF, Wallace DK. Retinopathy of prematurity care: patterns of care and workforce analysis. J. AAPOS 2008; 12: 3448.
  • 18
    Salcone EM, Johnston S, VanderVeen D. Review of the use of digital imaging in retinopathy of prematurity screening. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2010; 25: 21417.
  • 19
    Madden AC, Simmons D, McCarty CA, Khan MA, Taylor HR. Eye health in rural Australia. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2002; 30: 31621.
  • 20
    Mills MD. Evaluating the Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (CRYO-ROP). Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 127681.
  • 21
    Repka MX, Tung B, Good WV et al. Outcome of eyes developing retinal detachment during the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP). Arch. Ophthalmol. 2006; 124: 2430.
  • 22
    Bulpitt CJ, Baum JD. Retinal photography in the newborn. Arch. Dis. Child. 1969; 44: 499503.
  • 23
    Roth DB, Morales D, Feuer WJ, Hess D, Johnson RA, Flynn JT. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity employing the retcam 120: sensitivity and specificity. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001; 119: 26872.
  • 24
    Lorenz B, Bock M, Muller HM, Massie NA. Telemedicine based screening of infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 1999; 64: 15563.
  • 25
    Schwartz SD, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ, Trese MT. Telemedical evaluation and management of retinopathy of prematurity using a fiberoptic digital fundus camera. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 258.
  • 26
    Ells AL, Holmes JM, Astle WF et al. Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 21137.
  • 27
    Kemper AR, Wallace DK, Quinn GE. Systematic review of digital imaging screening strategies for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 82530.
  • 28
    Kumar S, Yogesan K. Internet-based eye care: VISION 2020. Lancet 2005; 366: 12445.
  • 29
    Chiang MF, Jiang L, Gelman R, Du YE, Flynn JT. Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 87580.
  • 30
    Chiang MF, Keenan JD, Starren J et al. Accuracy and reliability of remote retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2006; 124: 3227.
  • 31
    Dhaliwal C, Wright E, Graham C, McIntosh N, Fleck BW. Wide-field digital retinal imaging versus binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity screening: a two-observer prospective, randomised comparison. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 3559.
  • 32
    Shah DN, Karp KA, Ying GS, Mills MD, Quinn GE. Image analysis of posterior pole vessels identifies type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. J. AAPOS 2009; 13: 5078.
  • 33
    Yen KG, Hess D, Burke B, Johnson RA, Feuer WJ, Flynn JT. Telephotoscreening to detect retinopathy of prematurity: preliminary study of the optimum time to employ digital fundus camera imaging to detect ROP. J. AAPOS 2002; 6: 6470.
  • 34
    Murakami Y, Silva RA, Jain A, Lad EM, Gandhi J, Moshfeghi DM. Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 24-month experience with telemedicine screening. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88: 31722.
  • 35
    Silva RA, Murakami Y, Jain A, Gandhi J, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM. Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 18-month experience with telemedicine screening. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2009; 247: 12936.
  • 36
    Jackson KM, Scott KE, Graff Zivin J et al. Cost-utility analysis of telemedicine and ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity management. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008; 126: 4939.
  • 37
    Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O'Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 38
    Mukherjee AN, Watts P, Al-Madfai H, Manoj B, Roberts D. Impact of retinopathy of prematurity screening examination on cardiorespiratory indices: a comparison of indirect ophthalmoscopy and retcam imaging. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 154752.
  • 39
    Chiang MF, Wang L, Busuioc M et al. Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 15318.
  • 40
    Vinekar A. Tele-ophthalmology model for ROP management. Ophthalmol. Times 2009; 5: 27.
  • 41
    Silva RA, Murakami Y, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM. Stanford University network for diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (SUNDROP): 36-month experience with telemedicine screening. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging 2011; 42: 1219.
  • 42
    Williams SL, Wang L, Kane SA et al. Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: accuracy of expert versus non-expert graders. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 94: 3516.
  • 43
    Kandasamy Y, Kulathunga P. Identification of risk factors and evaluation of digital funduscopic screening for retinopathy of prematurity in a regional neonatal unit in Australia. Sri Lanka J. Child Health 2010; 39: 98101.
  • 44
    Wallace DK. Computer-assisted quantification of vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2007; 105: 594615.
  • 45
    Wallace DK, Freedman SF, Zhao Z. A pilot study using ROPtool to measure retinal vascular dilation. Retina 2009; 29: 11827.
  • 46
    Wallace DK, Freedman SF, Zhao Z, Jung SH. Accuracy of ROPtool versus individual examiners in assessing retinal vascular tortuosity. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 152330.
  • 47
    Thyparampil PJ, Park Y, Martinez-Perez ME et al. Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: quantitative analysis of vascular change. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 150: 46875 e462.
  • 48
    Wilson CM, Cocker KD, Moseley MJ et al. Computerized analysis of retinal vessel width and tortuosity in premature infants. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008; 49: 357785.
  • 49
    Wu H, Dong Y, Mu X, Li XH, Yan CY. [Digital retinal camera for screening of retinopathy of prematurity]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2010; 12: 7746.
  • 50
    Shah PK, Narendran V, Saravanan VR, Raghuram A, Chattopadhyay A, Kashyap M. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity – a comparison between binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and RetCam 120. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2006; 54: 358.
  • 51
    Saleh M, Schoenlaub S, Desprez P et al. Use of digital camera imaging of eye fundus for telemedicine in children suspected of abusive head injury. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 4248.
  • 52
    Carden S, Good W. The advantages of eye photography for retinopathy of prematurity. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2011; 39: 12.