Predictors of dropout among personality disorders in a specialist outpatients psychosocial treatment: A preliminary study
Article first published online: 23 MAR 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences © 2012 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Volume 66, Issue 3, pages 180–186, April 2012
How to Cite
Martino, F., Menchetti, M., Pozzi, E. and Berardi, D. (2012), Predictors of dropout among personality disorders in a specialist outpatients psychosocial treatment: A preliminary study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 66: 180–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02329.x
- Issue published online: 23 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 23 MAR 2012
- Received 17 May 2010; revised 22 November 2011; accepted 1 February 2012.
- borderline personality disorder;
- patient's subjective experience;
- psychosocial outpatient program;
- therapeutic relationship
Aim: The aim of this study was to identify factors that may affect treatment retention in a 1-year psychosocial program for adult personality disorders.
Methods: The sample consists of patients admitted to the Adult Personality Disorder Outpatient Programme of the Bologna Community Mental Health Centre in the period 2003–2008. At the beginning of the program, patients were evaluated through a comprehensive assessment including sociodemographic form, diagnostic interviews and self-report questionnaires. Patients who dropped out from treatment were retrospectively compared with patients who completed the program.
Results: Out of 39 patients enrolled in the program, 20 (51.3%) dropped out and 19 (48.7%) completed the treatment. Out of 20 patients who dropped out, 14 terminated the treatment within the first 2 months. The dropout group and the group which remained showed significant differences in diagnosis (borderline personality disorder [BPD]), demographic data (age, time from first contact with psychiatric services), clinical variable (impulsiveness) and subjective experience (motivation, treatment expectation, therapeutic relation perception and barriers to access). BPD and subjective evaluation were found to be predictors of premature termination in the sample. In detail, BPD patients who experienced a less satisfactory therapeutic relationship and reported many external problems were more likely to drop out of the program.
Conclusion: Important factors contributing to dropout were identified, with potential implication for clinical practice. Further efforts need to be made to find ways to retain BPD patients who find the first subjective experience of the service more problematic.