SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Freud A. Assessment of childhood disturbances. Psychoanal. Study Child 1962; 17: 149158.
  • 2
    Moses Laufer MS. Assessment of adolescent disturbances: The application of Anna Freud's diagnostic profile. Psychoanal. Study Child 1965; 20: 99123.
  • 3
    Westen D, Lohr N, Silk K, Kerber K, Goodrich S. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS): Manual for Coding Data. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1985.
  • 4
    Westen D. Social cognition and object relations. Psychol. Bull. 1991; 109: 429455.
  • 5
    Westen D. Are ‘primitive’ object relation really preoedipal? Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1989; 59: 331345.
  • 6
    Westen D, Ludolph P, Silk K, Kellam A, Gold L, Lohr N. Object relations in borderline adolescents: Developmental differences. Adolesc. Psychiatry 1990; 17: 360384.
  • 7
    Westen D, Ludolph P, Lerner H, Ruffins S, Wiss C. Object relations in borderline adolescents. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1990; 29: 338348.
  • 8
    Westen D, Ludolph P, Misle B, Ruffins S, Block J. Physical and sexual abuse in adolescent girls with borderline personality disorder. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1990; 60: 5566.
  • 9
    Nigg J, Lohr N, Westen D, Silk K, Gold L. Malevolent object representations in borderline personality disorder and major depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1992; 101: 6167.
  • 10
    Westen D, Lohr N, Silk K, Gold L, Kerber K. Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A thematic apperception test analysis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1990; 2: 335364.
  • 11
    Ackerman S, Clemence A, Wetherill R, Hilsenroth M. Use of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV cluster B personality disorders. J. Pers. Assess. 1999; 73: 422448.
  • 12
    Orndoff S, Kelsey R. Object relations of sexually and physically abused female children: A TAT analysis. J. Pers. Assess. 1996; 66: 91105.
  • 13
    Ikegami K. A study on relationship between psychosocial predatory nurturing environment in infancy and the development of object relations in adolescence. 2008 (Doctoral dissertation at Graduate School of Social Well-being Studies at Hosei University, in Japanese).
  • 14
    Bond M, Gardner S, Christian J, Sigal J. Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1983; 40: 333338.
  • 15
    Bond M, Vaillant JS. An empirical study of the relationship between diagnosis and defense. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1986; 43: 285288.
  • 16
    Bond M. Empirical studies of defense style: Relationships with psychopathology and change. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 2004; 12: 263278.
  • 17
    Hayashi M, Miyake Y, Minakawa K. Reliability and validity of the Japanese edition of the Defense Style Questionnaire 40. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2004; 58: 152156.
  • 18
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1994.
  • 19
    Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2007.
  • 20
    Westen D, Klepser J, Ruffins S, Silverman M, Lifton N, Boekamp J. Object relation in childhood and adolescence: The development of working representations. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1991; 59: 400409.