The use of artificial neural networks in analysing the nutritional ecology of Chrysomya megacephala (F.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), compared with a statistical model

Authors

  • André Bianconi,

    Corresponding author
    1. Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências – Unesp – São Paulo State University (postcode 13506-900), Avenida 24-A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro-SP, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Cláudio J Von Zuben,

    1. Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências – Unesp – São Paulo State University (postcode 13506-900), Avenida 24-A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro-SP, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Adriane B De Souza Serapião,

    1. Departamento de Estatística, Matemática Aplicada e Computação, Rio Claro-SP, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • José S Govone

    1. Departamento de Estatística, Matemática Aplicada e Computação, Rio Claro-SP, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author

drebianconi@yahoo.com.br

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been widely applied to the resolution of complex biological problems. An important feature of neural models is that their implementation is not precluded by the theoretical distribution shape of the data used. Frequently, the performance of ANNs over linear or non-linear regression-based statistical methods is deemed to be significantly superior if suitable sample sizes are provided, especially in multidimensional and non-linear processes. The current work was aimed at utilising three well-known neural network methods in order to evaluate whether these models would be able to provide more accurate outcomes in relation to a conventional regression method in pupal weight predictions of Chrysomya megacephala, a species of blowfly (Diptera: Calliphoridae), using larval density (i.e. the initial number of larvae), amount of available food and pupal size as input data. It was possible to notice that the neural networks yielded more accurate performances in comparison with the statistical model (multiple regression). Assessing the three types of networks utilised (Multi-layer Perceptron, Radial Basis Function and Generalised Regression Neural Network), no considerable differences between these models were detected. The superiority of these neural models over a classical statistical method represents an important fact, because more accurate models may clarify several intricate aspects concerning the nutritional ecology of blowflies.

Ancillary