SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • cyst;
  • laparoscopy;
  • seminal vesicle

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. References

Abstract  Primary diseases of the seminal vesicle are rare. Most seminal vesicle cysts are congenital, and two-thirds are associated with renal dysplasia or agenesis and ectopic ureter opening into the seminal vesicle. Acquired cysts may be due to genitourinary infections, surgical prostate resection or ejaculatory duct lithiasis. We report a case of video laparoscopic ablation of seminal vesicle cysts.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. References

Seminal vesicle cysts are rare lesions that can be either congenital or acquired.1 The majority remain asymptomatic. However, those cysts that become symptomatic usually require surgical management for alleviation of symptoms. Open surgery has been considered the definitive form of treatment. Although these procedures have produced excellent results, they can be associated with significant morbidity, such as rectal and bladder wall injury, ureteral injury, injury to the erectile neurovascular bundle and pelvic urinoma.2 With advances in laparoscopic equipment and experience it was natural to extend this approach to the seminal vesicle cyst. To date, due to the rarity of this lesion, only 10 cases of laparoscopic excision have been reported.

We report the eleventh case, of a laparoscopic seminal vesicle cyst excision.

Case report

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. References

A 78-year-old man presented with urinary frequency, nocturia, dribbling, reduced force of urinary stream, and an episode of acute urinary retention. The past medical history is significant for prostate adenocarcinoma discovered upon transurethral resection of the prostate in January 1999. The patient was placed on estramustine with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 5.9 ng/mL. Digital rectal examination revealed a large cystic mass in the area of the left seminal vesicle with no definable limits. Routine blood and urinary laboratory studies were normal. Ultrasonography showed a solid hypoehoic, well-defined and homogeneous tumor between the bladder and rectum. Excretory urography demonstrated elevation of the bladder on the left side. (Fig. 1). Both kidneys were normal. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of 7.7 cm × 6.8 cm left pelvic mass consistent with a seminal vesicle cyst (Fig. 2), which was confirmed on computed tomography (CT) scan (Fig. 3). Six month before the final procedure, transrectal aspiration of the cyst fluid was performed successfully and sent for culture, biochemical testing, and cytology. The aspirated fluid did not contain urine, was sterile, and was full of sperm cells. The cyst recurred 2 months after the initial aspiration.

image

Figure 1. Excretory urography shows a filling defect on the left lateral wall of bladder.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 2. Magnetic resonance imaging confirms left seminal vesicle cyst.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 3. Computed tomography scan revealed left seminal vesicle cyst.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Video laparoscopic excision of the cyst was performed with the patient under general anaesthesia. A Foley catheter was placed to drain the bladder. Transperitoneal access was achieved through four laparoscopic ports, including a 12 mm port at the umbilicus, a 12 mm port in the midline suprapubic area and 5 mm port on the left and right sides later to the rectoabdominal muscles and a short distance below the umbilicus, respectively.

The surgical table was placed in the Trendelenburg position, the bladder was retracted anteriorly, and the cyst was easily identified by a transverse incision in the retrovesical peritoneum. The left vas deferens was identified and dissected medially to the ampulla, and was used as a guide to the seminal vesicle. The dilated seminal vesicle was initially punctured and emptied. It was then opened to facilitate dissection from the surrounding structures. Finally, it was clipped and excised at the level of the ipsilateral ejaculatory duct. The entire cystic specimen was extracted through the 12-mm port.

The total operative time was 190 min, and blood loss was minimal. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the second postoperative day and did not present with any complaints or complications thereafter. Pathologic examination revealed focal erosion of the overlying epithelium with concurrent evidence of a moderate degree of a non-specific infectious process and the development of fibrosis.

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. References

The reproductive and renal systems are embryologically derived from the mesonephric duct. Anomalies of the seminal vesicles are commonly associated with abnormalities of other structures derived from the mesonephric duct, for example the vas deferens, kidney and ureter. One well recognized association is seminal vesicle cyst and ipsilateral renal agenesis.3 Mostly these cysts are asymptomatic and treatment is unnecessary. When symptoms occur they are varied and include perineal pain, scrotal pain, pain on defecation, dysuria, urinary frequency and urgency, and pain on ejaculation. Bladder outlet obstruction and ureteral obstruction have been observed, as have recurrent urinary tract infection, epididymitis and chronic prostatitis.4

The diagnosis of a seminal vesicle cyst is usually made in adulthood in the third to fifth decades of life.5,6 A mechanism of cyst formation is thought to be the build-up of seminal vesicle fluid due to an abnormal or obliterated ejaculatory duct.7

Physical examination may demonstrate an indurated, tender epididymis and ductus deferens, which is evidence of chronic epididymitis or obstruction, or a palpable cystic mass associated with the seminal vesicle on digital rectal examination, as in our case. Alternatively physical examination may show no physical findings, underscoring the need for maintaining a high index of suspicion for this disease entity in appropriate patients.

Abdominopelvic and transrectal ultrasound is the most useful initial diagnostic tool for long-standing pelvic pain and other suspicious historical or physical findings5,8,9 Subsequently CT can be performed to evaluate concurrent renal abnormalities and further define any pathological pelvic process. Additional studies, including excretory urography (IVP), MRI and seminovesiculography, may be selectively needed to differentiate a seminal vesicle cyst from another type of müllerian or wolffian duct cyst, seminal vesicle or rectal carcinoma, liposarcoma, leiomyoma or an abscess in the cul-de-sac.6 Cystoscopy may identify an absent ipsilateral hemitrigone, intravesical cyst protrusion and any other anatomical abnormality of the bladder.

Open surgery has been considered the definitive form of treatment. Although these procedures have produced excellent results, they can be associated with significant morbidity, such as rectal and bladder wall injury, ureteral injury, to the erectile neurovascular bundle and pelvic urinoma.2

In 1993, Kavoussi et al. described the principles of laparoscopic surgery on normal seminal vesicles in patients with prostate cancer.10 Although video laparoscopy is still a new technique, it is considered an alternative approach to treat most seminal vesicles as well as other retrovesical diseases. The technique is less invasive and shows satisfactory preliminary results.

The transperitoneal laparoscopic approach provides straightforward access and excellent visualization of the retrovesical seminal vesicles. Its blood supply can be meticulously controlled and the seminal vesicles can be cleanly dissected free of the bladder, prostate and overlying peritoneum without entering the bladder or rectum.

To date, due to the rarity of this lesion, only 10 cases of laparoscopic excision have been reported.6,11–13 Among these reports the average laparoscopic operative time has been 192 min, with an average hospital stay of 2.2 days (see Table 1). At follow up of 2 months to 15 years all patients have remained asymptomatic. In these few reported cases there have been no injuries to adjacent structures and no major complications.

Table 1.  Current reported experience with laparoscopic seminal vesicle cyst excision
ReferencesPatient age (years)SymptomsTotal operating time (min)Estimated bloodl oss (mL)Hospital stay (days)Follow up
Cherullo et al.630Chronic pelvic pain240250515 years
McDougall et al.1148Recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary frequency, pressure in suprapubic and rectal areas3642603 6 years
McDougall et al.1141Urinary frequency and urgency, perineal discomfort105 502 2 months
Cherullo et al.642Intermittent perineal pain, right orchalgia, pain on ejaculation refractory to conservative management180350Less than 23 h 2 years
Ikari et al.1210 monthsRecurrent urinary infection, epididymitis120Not reported2 4.6 months
Cherullo et al.635Left lower quadrant pelvic pain, dysuria, irritable voiding symptoms2103001 3 years
Basillote et al.14 7 Suprapubic pain and dysuria, right epididymitis180 (90 min laparoscopy time)  10115 months
McDougall et al.826Left pelvic, perineal and left testicular pain2572003 3 months
Carmignani et al.1319Lower urinary tract irritative and obstructive symptoms, intermittent pain on ejaculation180Not reported2 6 months
Ikari et al.1224Left pelvic pain 90Not reported2 4 months
Current case78Obstructive symptoms and acute urinary retention190  101 4 years

In conclusion, recent reports have demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach for excision of a seminal vesicle cyst. We propose laparoscopy as the treatment of choice for the management of symptomatic seminal vesicle cysts even if sizable because of its minimal invasiveness and short postoperative hospitalization.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. References
  • 1
    Tanagho EA. Embryology of the genitourinary system. In: TanaghoEA, McAninchJA (eds). Smith's General Urology, 14th edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, 1995; 1730.
  • 2
    Williams RD, Sandlow JL. Surgery of the seminal vesicles. In: WalshPC, RetikAB, VaughanED Jr, WeinAJ (eds). Campbell's Urology (Vol. 3 chapter 106), 7th edn. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 1998; 3299315.
  • 3
    Sheih C-P, Hung C-S, Wei C-F, Lin C-Y. Cystic dilatations within the pelvis in patients with ipsilateral renal agenesis or dysplasia. J. Urol. 1990; 144: 3247.
  • 4
    Patel B, Gujral K, Jefferson K, Evans S, Persad R. Seminal vesicle cysts and associated anomalies. BJU Int. 2002; 90: 26571.
  • 5
    Van den Ouden D, Blom JH, Bangma C, de Spiegeleer AH. Diagnosis and management of seminal vesicle cysts associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis: a pooled analysis of 52 cases. Eur. Urol. 1998; 33: 43340.
  • 6
    Cherullo EE, Meraney AM, Bernstein LH, Einstein DM, Thomas AJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic management of congenital seminal vesicle cysts associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis. J. Urol. 2002; 167: 12637.
  • 7
    Knudsen JB, Brun B, Emus HC. Familial renal agenesis and urogenital malformation. Seminal vesicle cyst and vaginal cyst with bicornate uterus in siblings. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1979; 13: 10911.
  • 8
    Roehrborn CG, Schneider H, Rugendorff EW, Hamann W. Embryological and diagnostic aspects of seminal vesicle cyst associated with upper urinary tract malformation. J. Urol. 1986; 135: 102932.
  • 9
    King BF, Hattery RR, Lieber MM, Berquist TH, Williamson B Jr, Hartman GW. Congenital cystic disease of the seminal vesicle. Radiology 1991; 178: 20711.
  • 10
    Kavoussi LR, Schuessler WW, Vancaillie T, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic approach to the seminal vesicles. J. Urol. 1993; 150: 41719.
  • 11
    McDougall EM, Afane JS, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic management of retrovesical cystic disease: Washington University experience and review of the literature. J. Endourol. 2001; 15: 81519.
  • 12
    Ikari O, Castilho LN, Lucena R, D’Ancona CAL, Netto NR Jr. Laparoscopic excision of seminal vesicle cysts. J. Urol. 1999; 162: 4989.
  • 13
    Carmignani G, Gallucci M, Puppo P, De Stefani S, Simonato A, Maffezzini M. Video laparoscopic excision of a seminal vesicle cyst associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 4379.
  • 14
    Basillote JB, Shanberg AM, Woo D, Perer E, Rajpoot D, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic excision of a seminal vesicle cyst in a child. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 36971.