• 1
    Sim HG, Cheng CW. Changing demography of prostate cancer in Asia. Eur. J. Cancer 2005; 41: 834845.
  • 2
    Paquette EL, Sun L, Paquette LR, Connelly R, McLeod DG, Moul JW. Improved prostate cancer specific survival and other disease parameters: impact of prostate-specific antigen testing. Urology 2002; 60: 756759.
  • 3
    Penson DF, Chan JM. Prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 20202029.
  • 4
    Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy: a new extravesical technique report on 20 cases. 1945. J. Urol. 2002; 167: 976980.
  • 5
    Memmelaar J. Total prostatovesiculectomy: retropubic approach. J. Urol. 1949; 62: 340348.
  • 6
    Reiner WG, Walsh PC. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J. Urol. 1979; 121: 198200.
  • 7
    Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and physiological considerations. Prostate 1983; 4: 473485.
  • 8
    Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Egginer SE et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J. Urol. 2004; 172 (6 Pt 1): 22272231.
  • 9
    Schuessler WW, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Vancaille T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J. Urol. 1992; 147: 246A.
  • 10
    Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS et al. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 612616.
  • 11
    Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 189202.
  • 12
    Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 408410.
  • 13
    Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog. Urol. 2000; 10: 520523.
  • 14
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2004; 31: 701717.
  • 15
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, The VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J. Urol. 2003; 169: 22892292.
  • 16
    Lee DI. Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are going. Yonsei Med. J. 2009; 50: 177181.
  • 17
    Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. J. Urol. 2008; 179: 22072211.
  • 18
    Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 702707.
  • 19
    Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999; 281: 15911597.
  • 20
    Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 540545.
  • 21
    Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 6171.
  • 22
    Lange PH, Ercole CJ, Lightner DJ et al. The value of serum prostate specific antigen determinations before and after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 1989; 141: 873879.
  • 23
    Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA et al. Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006; 24: 39733978.
  • 24
    Eastham J, Tokuda Y, Scardino P. Trends in radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol. 2009; 16: 151160.
  • 25
    Wright JL, Dalkin BL, True LD et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 22132218.
  • 26
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 864868.
  • 27
    Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003; 92: 205210.
  • 28
    Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819822.
  • 29
    Smith JJA, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 23852389.
  • 30
    Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int. 2008; 101: 11451149.
  • 31
    Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008; 102: 2832.
  • 32
    Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009; 103: 448453.
  • 33
    White MA, De Haan AP, Stephens DD, Maatman TK, Maatman TJ. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RARP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology 2009; 73: 567571.
  • 34
    Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009; 104: 991995.
  • 35
    Laurila TA, Huang W, Jarrard DF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol. Oncol. 2009; 27: 529533.
  • 36
    Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V et al. Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J. Urol. 2009; 27: 599605.
  • 37
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009; 104: 534539.
  • 38
    Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 990996.
  • 39
    Williams SB, Chen MH, D'Amico AV et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010; 76: 10971101.
  • 40
    Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN, Hou SS, To KF, Yip SK. Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med. J. 2010; 16: 3135.
  • 41
    Breyer BN, Davis CB, Cowan JE, Kane CJ, Carroll PR. Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010; 106: 17341738.
  • 42
    Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM et al. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int. 2011; 107: 19561962.
  • 43
    Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 16.
  • 44
    Masterson TA, Cheng L, Boris RS, Koch MO. Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes. Urol. Oncol. 2012; doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.002.
  • 45
    Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robot assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int. 2005; 96: 3942.
  • 46
    Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 478482.
  • 47
    Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Can. J. Urol. 2008; 15: 39943999.
  • 48
    Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R. Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 2009; 73: 119123.
  • 49
    Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Sex. Med. 2011; 8: 15031512.
  • 50
    Park JW, Won Lee H, Kim W et al. Comparative assessment of a single surgeon's series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted. J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 597602.
  • 51
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 10371063.
  • 52
    Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 115.
  • 53
    Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 382404.
  • 54
    Rochat CH, Sauvain J, Dubernard P, Hebert AE, Kreaden U. Mid-term biochemical recurrence-free outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Robotic Surg. 2011; 5: 251257.
  • 55
    Jønler M, Madsen FA, Rhodes PR, Sall M, Messing EM, Bruskewitz RC. A prospective study of quantification of urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1996; 48: 433440.
  • 56
    Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009; 302: 15571564.
  • 57
    Walsh PC, Marschke PL. Intussusception of the reconstructed bladder neck leads to earlier continence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 59: 934938.
  • 58
    Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2006; 175: 22012206.
  • 59
    Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 9961003.
  • 60
    Nguyen MM, Kamoi K, Stein RJ et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008; 101: 11351139.
  • 61
    Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 472478.
  • 62
    Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S et al. Total reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction. BJU Int. 2008; 101: 871877.
  • 63
    Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69: 726731.
  • 64
    Minniti D, Chiadò Piat S, Di Novi C. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based comparison. Technol. Health Care 2011; 19: 331339.
  • 65
    Kim SC, Song C, Kim W et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 413419.
  • 66
    Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, Fowler FJ Jr. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012; 30: 513518.
  • 67
    Kowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF et al. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61: 803809.
  • 68
    Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD. Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol. Oncol. 2010; 28: 8185.
  • 69
    Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 1996; 156: 17071713.
  • 70
    Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 12121215.
  • 71
    Lee SR, Kim HW, Lee JW, Jeong WJ, Rha KH, Kim JH. Discrepancies in perception of urinary incontinence between patient and physician after robotic radical prostatectomy. Yonsei Med. J. 2010; 51: 883887.
  • 72
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 405417.
  • 73
    Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982; 128: 492497.
  • 74
    Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2003; 43: 444454.
  • 75
    Ong AM, Su LM, Varkarakis I et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. J. Urol. 2004; 172 (4 Pt 1): 13181322.
  • 76
    Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Chou D et al. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 2005; 65: 994997.
  • 77
    Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the pasadena consensus panel. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 368381.
  • 78
    Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 2005; 66: 12611265.
  • 79
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 8996.
  • 80
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering T et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 418430.
  • 81
    Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360363.
  • 82
    Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 929931.
  • 83
    Gainsburg DM, Wax D, Reich DL, Carlucci JR, Samadi DB. Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. JSLS 2010; 14: 15.
  • 84
    Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 2010; 75: 10921097.
  • 85
    Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int. 2010; 106: 378384.
  • 86
    Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO et al. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010; 106: 10361040.
  • 87
    Truesdale MD, Lee DJ, Cheetham PJ, Hruby GW, Turk AT, Badani KK. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 10551060.
  • 88
    Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61: 679685.
  • 89
    Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J. Urol. 2012; 187: 13921398.
  • 90
    Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the united states. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012; 215: 107114.
  • 91
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol. 2002; 168: 945949.
  • 92
    Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2006; 175: 541546.
  • 93
    Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 431452.
  • 94
    Hohwu L, Akre O, Pedersen KV et al. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2009; 43: 259264.
  • 95
    Boxer RJ, Kaufman JJ, Goodwin WE. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: 1951–1976. A review of 329 patients. J. Urol. 1977; 117: 208213.
  • 96
    Veenema RJ, Gursel EO, Lattimer JK. Radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer: a 20-yer experience. J. Urol. 1977; 117: 330331.
  • 97
    Heer R, Raymond I, Jackson MJ, Soomro NA. A critical systematic review of recent clinical trials comparing open retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2011; 6: 241249.