SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 4146.
  • 2
    Wheat JC, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Stuart Wolf Jr J, Weizer AZ. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.003.
  • 3
    Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 844853.
  • 4
    Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 4246.
  • 5
    Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 724730.
  • 6
    Rosevear HM, Gellhaus PT, Lightfoot AJ, Kresowik TP, Joudi FN, Tracy CR. Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk. BJU Int. 2012; 109: 700705.
  • 7
    Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 876881.
  • 8
    Mufarrij PW, Krane LS, Rajamahanty S, Hemal AK. Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 16491653.
  • 9
    Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ. Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 2011; 78: 592594.
  • 10
    Weight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT et al. A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter-reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long-term outcomes. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 12231228.
  • 11
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205213.
  • 12
    Levey AS, Greene T, Schluchter MD et al. Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1993; 4: 11591171.
  • 13
    Weizer AZ, Gilbert SM, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS Jr. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 12731278.
  • 14
    Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754758.
  • 15
    Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 241248.
  • 16
    Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 2011; 78: 10891094.
  • 17
    Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Perioperative outcomes for robotic and open partial nephrectomy in moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J. Urol. 2012; 187: 20002004.