Tony Auld is a Principal Research Scientist and was a member of the New South Wales Scientific Committee 1996–2002. He leads the Plant Ecology Unit, Department of Environment and Climate Change, New South Wales (PO Box 1967, Hurstville BC, NSW 1481, Australia; Email: email@example.com). David Keith is a Senior Principal Research Scientist and was a member of the New South Wales Scientific Committee 2003–2008. He leads a research group on Vegetation Dynamics in the Department of Environment and Climate Change, New South Wales.
Dealing with threats: Integrating science and management
Article first published online: 30 APR 2009
© 2009 Ecological Society of Australia
Ecological Management & Restoration
Special Issue: Science supporting threatened species conservation
Volume 10, Issue Supplement s1, pages S79–S87, May 2009
How to Cite
Auld, T. D. and Keith, D. A. (2009), Dealing with threats: Integrating science and management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 10: S79–S87. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2009.00447.x
- Issue published online: 30 APR 2009
- Article first published online: 30 APR 2009
- climate change;
- disturbance regimes;
- exotic species;
- key threatening processes;
- life history processes
Summary Threats to biodiversity are pervasive and diverse. The management of these threats is the major focus of conservation biology. We briefly reviewed the taxonomy of direct threats to biodiversity as a means of examining legislated planning actions and strategies for managing threatening processes in eastern Australia and propose a simple classification of five general types of threat. These include the major threats of destruction and fragmentation of habitat and global climate change; threats that relate directly to changes in disturbance regimes (e.g. fire and water); threats related to reduced functionality of biological interactions or life-cycle processes (e.g. due to invasions of exotic species); and over-exploitation affecting specific groups of plant and animal species. We applied this five-level classification to the listings of key threatening processes under legislation in three Australian jurisdictions (Commonwealth, New South Wales, Victoria). A small core group of threats are currently common to all three jurisdictions, including clearing of native vegetation, climate change and particular alien predators and diseases. The bulk of listings reflect differences in emphasis between jurisdictions, with the Commonwealth having not listed threats related to weeds or disturbance regimes.
To manage all types of threats, we need a clear understanding of cause and effect combined with adaptive management strategies for amelioration. We use selected case studies to show how a process-based understanding of threats can be incorporated into conservation management. In fire-prone ecosystems in New South Wales, for example, threats posed by increased fire frequency have been addressed in fire planning by prescribing management thresholds, derived from knowledge of the limits set by seed bank dynamics in relation to species persistence. Monitoring of species after fire allows re-evaluation of recommended intervals. In arid and semi-arid systems, grazing by introduced herbivores has disrupted the recruitment of new individuals into plant populations, resulting in long-term decline of a number of perennial plant species across extensive proportions of their ranges. In conjunction with long-term monitoring of recruitment patterns at selected locations, control of introduced herbivores is being used to address this threat. Finally, strategies for dealing with threats of a changing climate (including managing the capacity of species to disperse across the landscape) must include strategies for minimizing habitat loss and on-site management of existing threats.