Prevalence of trachoma and diabetes-related eye disease among a cohort of adult Aboriginal patients screened over the period 1999–2004 in remote South Australia

Authors

  • Shane R Durkin MB BS(Hons),

    Corresponding author
    1. South Australia Ophthalmology Network, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Robert Casson FRANZCO,

    1. South Australia Ophthalmology Network, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and
    2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Henry S Newland FRANZCO,

    1. South Australia Ophthalmology Network, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and
    2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dinesh Selva FRANZCO

    1. South Australia Ophthalmology Network, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and
    2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Dr Shane R Durkin, Resident Medical Officer, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Email: shane_durkin@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background:  To determine the prevalence of trachoma and diabetes-related eye disease within the adult Aboriginal population screened by the South Australian Eye Health Program between 1999 and 2004 inclusive.

Methods:  The South Australian Eye Health Program visited 22 Aboriginal communities in remote South Australia. Visiting ophthalmologists and optometrists systematically collected data on the cohort of adult patients seen over the period 1999–2004. Prevalence and grade of trachoma according to World Health Organization classification and the prevalence and degree of diabetic retinopathy according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study and National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines were recorded.

Results:  A population of 1651 Aboriginal patients was examined. Sixty-two per cent were female and 38% were male. Twenty patients (1.2%) had evidence of active trachoma with 260 (15.7%) patients having either lid scarring, trichiasis or corneal opacity. There was no significant association between gender and the prevalence of trachoma (P = 0.48). Seven hundred and seventy-one patients within the examined population had diabetes mellitus (46.70%). Significantly more women than men were affected and prevalence increased with age (P < 0.0001). One hundred and sixty-nine patients (22%) with diabetes mellitus had features of diabetic retinopathy, and of these patients 77 had background diabetic retinopathy (46%) and 92 (54%) had either proliferative diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy. Prevalence of clinically significant macula oedema among those with maculopathy (14 of 50 patients) was 28%.

Conclusions:  The data suggest that although trachoma is still endemic in this South Australian Aboriginal population the prevalence and severity are less than previously reported. Diabetes mellitus has a high prevalence within this population and great potential for detrimental visual sequelae.

Ancillary