SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Shigeta K, Takegoshi H, Kikuchi S. Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125: 167781.
  • 2
    Woog JJ. The incidence of symptomatic acquired lacrimal outflow obstruction among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–2000 (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007; 105: 64966.
  • 3
    Traquair H. Chronic dacryocystitis: its causation and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1941; 26: 16580.
  • 4
    Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR, Camara JG. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 236977.
  • 5
    Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PAD. Evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol 2003; 48: 7384.
  • 6
    Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 7884.
  • 7
    Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, Puukka P, Seppä H, Grenman R. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 18616.
  • 8
    Verma A, Khabori MA, Zutshi R. Endonasal carbon-dioxide laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 58: 914.
  • 9
    Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 14638.
  • 10
    Yigit O, Samancioglu M, Taskin U, Ceylan S, Eltutar K, Yener M. External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 87985.
  • 11
    Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Revision dacryocystorhinostomy:a comparison of endoscopic and external techniques. Am J Rhinol 2005; 19: 3225.
  • 12
    Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. 2008.
  • 13
    Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 110613.
  • 14
    Lester SE, Robson AK, Bearn M. Endoscopic ‘cold steel’ versus laser dacryocystorhinostomy: completing the audit cycle. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 122: 9247.
  • 15
    Mirza A, Al-Barmani A, Douglas SA, Bearn MA, Robson AK. A retrospective comparison of endonasal KTP laser dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27: 34751.
  • 16
    Watts P, Ram AR, Nair R, Williams H. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and 5-fluorouracil augmented endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. a retrospective review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001; 49: 16972.
  • 17
    Ibrahim HA, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, McGalliard J. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2001; 32: 2207.
  • 18
    Ajalloueyan M, Fartookzadeh M, Parhizgar H. Use of laser for dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133: 3403.
  • 19
    Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM. A consideration of the time taken to do dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye 2003; 17: 6916.
  • 20
    Maini S, Raghava N, Youngs R et al. Endoscopic endonasal laser versus endonasal surgical dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121: 11706.
  • 21
    Anari S, Ainsworth G, Robson AK. Cost-efficiency of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122: 4769.
  • 22
    Sharma B. Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2008; 6: 43742.
  • 23
    Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 48891.
  • 24
    Leong SC, Karkos PD, Burgess P, Halliwell M, Hampal SA. Comparison of outcomes between nonlaser endoscopic endonasal and external dacryocystorhinostomy: single-center experience and a review of British trends. Am J Otolaryngol 2010; 31: 327.
  • 25
    Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 20: 506.