Get access

Management of upper eyelid cicatricial entropion

Authors

  • Adam H Ross MRCOphth,

    1. Corneoplastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, Sussex
    2. Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Paul S Cannon FRCOphth,

    1. Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide and South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dinesh Selva PhD FRANZCO,

    1. Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide and South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Raman Malhotra FRCOphth

    Corresponding author
    1. Corneoplastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, Sussex
    Search for more papers by this author

Mr Raman Malhotra, Corneoplastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Holyte Road, East Grinstead, Sussex RH19 3DZ, UK. Email: raman.malhotra@qvh.nhs.uk

Abstract

Purpose:  There is a paucity of published data on the management of upper eyelid cicatricial entropion. We report on our results using such techniques as lamella repositioning, recession or augmentation and terminal tarsal rotation.

Design:  Observational retrospective case series.

Participants:  Consecutive cases of upper eyelid cicatricial entropion of two specialist oculoplastic centres (Corneoplastic Unit, East Grinstead, UK and South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Adelaide, Australia) were reviewed over a 7-year period.

Methods:  All patients underwent anterior lamellar repositioning or terminal tarsal rotation.

Main Outcome Measures:  Success was defined by two definitions: anatomical success was defined where the lid margin was restored to its normal position. Complete success was defined where there were no eyelashes touching the globe. Gain or loss (≤ or ≥2 Snellen lines) in best corrected visual acuity using a Snellen chart and resolution of any corneal epitheliopathy at final follow-up were also recorded (as graded by experienced oculoplastic consultants).

Results:  Fifty-two procedures were performed on 41 patients (11 bilateral). All patients underwent either an anterior lamellar repositioning or a terminal tarsal rotation. Trachoma, previous upper lid surgery, Stevens–Johnson syndrome and meibomian gland dysfunction were the commonest underlying diagnoses. Ninety-eight per cent of the group had a normal anatomical lid position at follow-up. Nine eyelids (17%) of the group had recurrence of trichiasis.

Conclusion:  This large case series demonstrates that upper eyelid cicatricial entropion is managed effectively utilizing procedures that involve recession and reposition. We recommend that excision of tissue is avoided, especially in pathology that has a progressive immunological cicatricial drive.

Ancillary