Present address: Sappi Forests (Pty) Ltd. PO Box 13124, Cascades 3202, South Africa.
Forest landscape pattern in the KwaZulu–Natal midlands, South Africa: 50 years of change or stasis?
Version of Record online: 12 OCT 2009
Volume 29, Issue 6, pages 613–623, December 2004
How to Cite
LAWES, M. J., MACFARLANE, D. M. and EELEY, H. A. C. (2004), Forest landscape pattern in the KwaZulu–Natal midlands, South Africa: 50 years of change or stasis?. Austral Ecology, 29: 613–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01396.x
- Issue online: 12 OCT 2009
- Version of Record online: 12 OCT 2009
- Accepted for publication February 2004.
- Afromontane forest;
- edge effects;
- matrix effects;
- patch size;
- temporal change
Abstract Understanding patterns and processes of habitat change is essential for managing and conserving forest fragments in anthropogenically altered landscapes. Digitized aerial photographs from 1944 and 1996 were examined for changes to the indigenous forest landscape in the Karkloof-Balgowan archipelago in KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa. Attributes relating to proximate land-use, patch shape, isolation and position in the landscape were used to determine putative causes of forest change. The total change in forest area was −5.7% (forest covered 6739 ha in 1996). This is contrasted with previous reports for the period 1880–1940 that estimated change in total forest area of up to −80%. Attrition was the predominant process of forest transformation between 1944 and 1996. Despite little overall change in forest area, 786 mostly small (<0.5 ha) forest patches were lost from the landscape, leaving 1277 forest patches in 1996. An increase in patch isolation, but no change in patch cohesion accompanied the changes in forest area. Ignoring patches that were eliminated, 514 patches decreased in area. This was partly a function of patch size, but the conversion of natural grassland to commercial plantation forestry in the matrix also influenced forest decline. Their small size and irregular shape caused forest patches in the region to be vulnerable to edge effects. Core area declined in a negative exponential way with increasing edge width and the total area of edge habitat exceeded that of core habitat at an edge width of only 50 m. Nevertheless, total core area decreased by only 2% (65 ha) between 1944 and 1996 because most of the eliminated patches were small and contained no core area. The large Karkloof forest (1649 ha) is a conservation priority for forest interior species, but the ecological role and biodiversity value of small forest patches should not be overlooked.