SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 453464.
  • 2
    Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith EL 3rd, Crawford ML. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 22422250.
  • 3
    Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007: 26: 688710.
  • 4
    Cordeiro MF, Guo L, Luong V, Harding G, Wang W, Jones HE, Moss SE et al. Real-time imaging of single nerve cell apoptosis in retinal neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 1335213356.
  • 5
    Maass A, von Leithner PL, Luong V, Guo L, Salt TE, Fitzke FW, Cordeiro MF. Assessment of rat and mouse RGC apoptosis imaging in vivo with different scanning laser ophthalmoscopes. Curr Eye Res 2007; 32: 851681.
  • 6
    Guo L, Cordeiro MF. Assessment of neuroprotection in the retina with DARC. Prog Brain Res 2008; 173: 437450.
  • 7
    Barnett EM, Zhang X, Maxwell D, Chang Q, Piwnica-Worms D. Single-cell imaging of retinal ganglion cell apoptosis with a cell-penetrating, activatable peptide probe in an in vivo glaucoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 93919396.
  • 8
    Khaw PT, Shah P, Elkington AR. Glaucoma–1: diagnosis. BMJ 2004; 328: 9799.
  • 9
    Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 389393.
  • 10
    Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262267.
  • 11
    Harbin TS Jr, Podos SM, Kolker AE, Becker B. Visual field progression in open-angle glaucoma patients presenting with monocular field loss. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1976; 81: 253257.
  • 12
    Kass MA, Kolker AE, Becker B. Prognostic factors in glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 12741276.
  • 13
    Susanna R, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The visual prognosis of the fellow eye in uniocular chronic open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 327329.
  • 14
    Fechtner RD, Juzych MS, Lin SC, Netland PA, Pastor SA, Schuman JS, Samples JR. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 23622374.
  • 15
    Hernandez MR. The optic nerve head in glaucoma: role of astrocytes in tissue remodeling. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 297321.
  • 16
    Flammer J, Orgul S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, Renard JP et al. The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2002; 21: 359393.
  • 17
    Haefliger IO, Flammer J, Beny JL, Luscher TF. Endothelium-dependent vasoactive modulation in the ophthalmic circulation. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001; 20: 209225.
  • 18
    Chung HS, Harris A, Evans DW, Kagemann L, Garzozi HJ, Martin B. Vascular aspects in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 43: S43-S50.
  • 19
    Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR, L'Hernault NL, Baginski TA. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 913920.
  • 20
    Lee VW, Mok KH. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by nerve fiber analyzer in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 10061008.
  • 21
    Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 378384.
  • 22
    Ansari EA, Morgan JE, Snowden RJ. Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 11311135.
  • 23
    Morgan JE, Uchida H, Caprioli J. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 303310.
  • 24
    Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Atrophy of relay neurons in magno- and parvocellular layers in the lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 32163222.
  • 25
    Morgan JE. Retinal ganglion cell shrinkage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 365370.
  • 26
    Corbett MC, Shilling JS, Holder GE. The assessment of clinical investigations: the Greenwich Grading System and its application to electrodiagnostic testing in ophthalmology. Eye 1995; 9: 5964.
  • 27
    Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man: I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992; 32: 433446.
  • 28
    Brown B, Yap MK. Contrast and luminance as parameters defining the output of the VERIS topographical ERG. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 4248.
  • 29
    Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE. Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1996; 13: 634640.
  • 30
    Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Matsuno K, Wakaguri T, Kikuchi Y, Okisaka S. Relationship between visual field defect and multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 136141.
  • 31
    Marmor MF, Chappelow AV, Luo G. Recognition of small stimulus screen masks using the multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 2002; 104: 277286.
  • 32
    Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, Palmowski-Wolfe AM. ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography (2007 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 2008; 116: 111.
  • 33
    Sutter E. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 4975.
  • 34
    Sutter EE. Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 2001; 41: 12411255.
  • 35
    Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S. Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 16731685.
  • 36
    Ng YF, Chan HH, Chu PH, Siu AW, To CH, Beale BA, Gilger BC et al. Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 2008; 116: 165176.
  • 37
    Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Harwerth RS, Viswanathan S, Li Y, Smith EL 3rd, Robson JG et al. Effects of experimental glaucoma in macaques on the multifocal ERG. Multifocal ERG in laser-induced glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 231251.
  • 38
    Hood DC, Greenstein V, Frishman L, Holopigian K, Viswanathan S, Seiple W, Ahmed J, Robson JG. Identifying inner retinal contributions to the human multifocal ERG. Vision Res 1999; 39: 22852291.
  • 39
    Nabeshima T, Tazawa Y, Mita M, Sano M. Effects of aging on the first and second-order kernels of multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002; 46: 261269.
  • 40
    Fortune B, Johnson CA. Decline of photopic multifocal electroretinogram responses with age is due primarily to preretinal optical factors. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002; 19: 173184.
  • 41
    Gerth C, Garcia SM, Ma L, Keltner JL, Werner JS. Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 202208.
  • 42
    Jackson GR, Ortega J, Girkin C, Rosenstiel CE, Owsley C. Aging-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002; 19: 185189.
  • 43
    Seiple W, Vajaranant TS, Szlyk JP, Clemens C, Holopigian K, Paliga J, Badawi D et al. Multifocal electroretinography as a function of age: the importance of normative values for older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 17831792.
  • 44
    Tam WK, Chan H, Brown B, Leung KW, Woo V, Yap M. Aging and mfERG topography. Eye 2006; 20: 1824.
  • 45
    Kretschmann U, Bock M, Gockeln R, Zrenner E. Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 99113.
  • 46
    Chan HL, Brown B. Investigation of retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 335350.
  • 47
    Hood DC, Holopigian K, Greenstein V, Seiple W, Li J, Sutter EE, Carr RE. Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique. Vision Res 1998; 38: 163179.
  • 48
    Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E. Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 718723.
  • 49
    Li J, Tso MO, Lam TT. Reduced amplitude and delayed latency in foveal response of multifocal electroretinogram in early age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 287290.
  • 50
    Wildberger H, Junghardt A. Local visual field defects correlate with the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in retinal vascular branch occlusion. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002; 219: 254258.
  • 51
    Sasoh M, Yoshida S, Kuze M, Uji Y. The multifocal electroretinogram in retinal detachment. Doc Ophthalmol 1998; 94: 239252.
  • 52
    Palmowski AM, Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr, Fung W. Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 25862596.
  • 53
    Fortune B, Schneck ME, Adams AJ. Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 26382651.
  • 54
    Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr. The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res 1999; 39: 419436.
  • 55
    Vaegan, Sanderson G. Absence of ganglion cell subcomponents in multifocal luminance electroretinograms. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997; 25: S87-S90.
  • 56
    Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Wada H, Sakemi F, Enoki T, Okisaka S. Analysis of second-order kernel response components of multifocal electroretinograms elicited from normal subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001; 45: 247251.
  • 57
    Chan HL, Brown B. Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 306316.
  • 58
    Hasegawa S, Takagi M, Usui T, Takada R, Abe H. Waveform changes of the first-order multifocal electroretinogram in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41; 15971603.
  • 59
    Chan HH, Brown B. Pilot study of the multifocal electroretinogram in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 11471153.
  • 60
    Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, Sim D, Stamper R. Glaucomatous dysfunction revealed in higher-order components of the electroretinogram. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 1996; 1: 104107.
  • 61
    Sakemi F, Yoshii M, Okisaka S. Multifocal electroretinograms in early primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002; 46: 443450.
  • 62
    Hare WA, Ton H. Effects of APB, PDA, and TTX on ERG responses recorded using both multifocal and conventional methods in monkey. Effects of APB, PDA and TTX on monkey ERG responses. Doc Ophthalmol 2002; 105: 189222.
  • 63
    Hare WA, Ton H, Ruiz G, Feldmann B, Wijono M, WoldeMussie E. Characterization of retinal injury using ERG measures obtained with both conventional and multifocal methods in chronic ocular hypertensive primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 127136.
  • 64
    Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Viswanathan S, Robson JG, Ahmed J. Evidence for a ganglion cell contribution to the primate electroretinogram (ERG): effects of TTX on the multifocal ERG in macaque. Vis Neurosci 1999; 16: 411416.
  • 65
    Raz D, Perlman I, Percicot CL, Lambrou GN, Ofri R. Functional damage to inner and outer retinal cells in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 36753684.
  • 66
    Fortune B, Bui BV, Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Dong J, Cepurna WO, Jia L et al. Selective ganglion cell functional loss in rats with experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 18541862.
  • 67
    Hood DC, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ. The optic nerve head component of the monkey's (Macaca mulatta) multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). Vision Res 2001; 41: 20292041.
  • 68
    Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, Moss A, Podos SM. Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1979; 88: 205211.
  • 69
    McKendrick AM, Sampson GP, Walland GP, Badcock DR. Impairments of contrast discrimination and contrast adaptation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 920927.
  • 70
    Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE. Contrast dependence of multifocal ERG components. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 1998; 1: 2427.
  • 71
    Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Holopigian K, Bauer R, Firoz B, Liebmann JM, Odel JG et al. An attempt to detect glaucomatous damage to the inner retina with the multifocal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 15701579.
  • 72
    Chan HH. Detection of glaucomatous damage using multifocal ERG. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88: 410414.
  • 73
    Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Heinemann-Vemaleken B. The multifocal ERG in open angle glaucoma—a comparison of high and low contrast recordings in high- and low-tension open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 101: 3549.
  • 74
    Wu S, Sutter EE. A topographic study of oscillatory potentials in man. Vis Neurosci 1995; 12: 10131025.
  • 75
    Sano M, Tazawa Y, Nabeshima T, Mita M. A new wavelet in the multifocal electroretinogram, probably originating from ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 16661672.
  • 76
    Palmowski-Wolfe AM, Allgayer RJ, Vernaleken B, Schotzau A, Ruprecht KW. Slow-stimulated multifocal ERG in high- and normal-tension glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2006; 112: 157168.
  • 77
    Rangaswamy NV, Zhou W, Harwerth RS, Frishman LJ. Effect of experimental glaucoma in primates on oscillatory potentials of the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 753767.
  • 78
    Rangaswamy NV, Hood DC, Frishman LJ. Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 32333247.
  • 79
    Zhou W, Rangaswamy N, Ktonas P, Frishman LJ. Oscillatory potentials of the slow-sequence multifocal ERG in primates extracted using the Matching Pursuit method. Vision Res 2007; 47: 20212036.
  • 80
    Sutter EE, Shimada Y, Li Y, Bearse MA Jr. Mapping inner retinal function through enhancement of adaptation components in the M-ERG. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 1999; 1: 5255.
  • 81
    Hood DC. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000: 19: 607646.
  • 82
    Shimada Y, Li Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, Fung W. Assessment of early retinal changes in diabetes using a new multifocal ERG protocol. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 414419.
  • 83
    Fortune B, Bearse MA Jr, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA. Selective loss of an oscillatory component from temporal retinal multifocal ERG responses in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 26382647.
  • 84
    Feigl B, Brown B, Lovie-Kitchin J, Swann P. Adaptation responses in early age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 47224727.
  • 85
    Shimada Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE. Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 132141.
  • 86
    Chen JC, Brown B, Schmid KL. Retinal adaptation responses revealed by global flash multifocal electroretinogram are dependent on the degree of myopic refractive error. Vision Res 2006; 46: 34133421.
  • 87
    Palmowski-Wolfe AM, Todorova MG, Orguel S, Flammer J, Brigell M. The ‘two global flash’ mfERG in high and normal tension primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2007; 114: 919.
  • 88
    Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Ruprecht KW. Multifocal electroretinogram with a multiflash stimulation technique in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res 2002; 34: 8389.
  • 89
    Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr, Stamper RL, Lambrou GN, Percicot CL, Ofri R, Raz D. Monitoring retinal ganglion cell function with the MERG. Vis Sci Appl OSA Tech Dig Ser 2001; 1: 1013.
  • 90
    Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B. Glaucoma detection is facilitated by luminance modulation of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 929937.
  • 91
    Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B. Luminance-modulated adaptation of global flash mfERG: fellow eye losses in asymmetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 26262633.
  • 92
    Kim DM, Hwang US, Park KH, Kim SH. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the fellow eyes of normal-tension glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field defect. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 165166.
  • 93
    Chu PH, Chan HH, Ng YF, Brown B, Siu AW, Beale BA, Gilger BC et al. Porcine global flash multifocal electroretinogram: possible mechanisms for the glaucomatous changes in contrast response function. Vision Res 2008; 48: 17261734.
  • 94
    Miguel-Jiménez JM, Boquete L, Ortega S, Rodríguez-Ascariz JM, Blanco R. Glaucoma detection by wavelet-based analysis of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram. Med Eng Phys 2010; 32: 617622.
  • 95
    Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 6581.
  • 96
    Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 115137.
  • 97
    Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 15801587.
  • 98
    Klistorner A, Graham SL. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 22832299.
  • 99
    Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003; 22: 201251.
  • 100
    Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 729739.
  • 101
    Balachandran C, Graham SL, Klistorner A, Goldberg I. Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 110116.
  • 102
    Grippo TM, Hood DC, Kanadani FN, Ezon I, Greenstein VC, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. A comparison between multifocal and conventional VEP latency changes secondary to glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 53315336.
  • 103
    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, Xu L, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 321327.
  • 104
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL et al. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 11731180.
  • 105
    Klistorner A, Graham SL, Martins A, Grigg JR, Arvind H, Kumar RS, James AC, Billson FA. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 16131621.