SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    von Noorden GK. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th ed. St.Louis: Mosby, 2002.
  • 2
    Schroeder TL, Rainey BB, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 389397.
  • 3
    Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among three variations of the alternating cover test. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 430437.
  • 4
    Weymouth, FW. An experimental comparison of three common methods of measuring heterophoria. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1963; 40: 497503.
  • 5
    Escalante JB, Rosenfield M. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Optometry 2006; 77: 229234.
  • 6
    Daum KM. Analysis of seven methods of measuring the angle of deviation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 4651.
  • 7
    Alvarez CP, Puell M, Sanchez-Ramos C, Villena C. Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 244: 821824.
  • 8
    Goss DA, Moyer BJ, Teske MC. A comparison of dissociated test phoria findings with von Graefe phorometry and modified Thorington testing. J Behav Optom 2008; 19: 145149.
  • 9
    Hirsch MJ, Bing LB. The effect of testing method on values obtained for phoria at forty centimeters. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1948: 25: 407416.
  • 10
    Morris FM. The influence of kinesthesis upon near heterophoria measurements. Am J OptomArch Am Acad Optom 1960; 37: 327351.
  • 11
    Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor T. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 719726.
  • 12
    Casillas CE, Rosenfield M. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 237241.
  • 13
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307310.
  • 14
    Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stöckl D, Thienpont LM. Application of the Bland–Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: A critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 799801.
  • 15
    Leone JF, Cornell E, Morgan IG, Mitchell P, Kifley A, Wang JJ, Rose KA. Prevalence of heterophoria and associations with refractive error, heterotropia and ethnicity in Australian school children. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 542546.
  • 16
    Lam KC, Lam A, Charm J, Wong K. Comparisons of near heterophoria test under varying conditions on an adult sample. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 162167.
  • 17
    Ludvigh E. Amount of eye movement objectively perceptible to the unaided eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1949; 32: 649650.
  • 18
    Romano PE, von Noorden GK. Limitations of cover test in detecting strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 1971; 72: 1012.
  • 19
    Scobey RG, Green EL. Tests for heterophoria-reliability of tests, comparison between tests and effect of changing testing conditions. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1947; 51: 179197.
  • 20
    Howarth PA, Heron G. Repeated measures of horizontal heterophoria. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 616619.
  • 21
    Rosenfield M, Cohen AS. Push-up amplitude of accommodation and target size (letter). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 231232.