Lost opportunity cost of surgical training in the Australian private sector
Article first published online: 9 JAN 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05968.x
© 2012 The Author. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2012 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
Additional Information
How to Cite
Aitken, R. J. (2012), Lost opportunity cost of surgical training in the Australian private sector. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 82: 145–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05968.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 9 JAN 2012
- Accepted for publication 24 August 2011.
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- private;
- supervision;
- surgeon;
- training;
- workforce
Abstract
Background: To meet Australia's future demands, surgical training in the private sector will be required. The aim of this study was to estimate the time and lost opportunity cost of training in the private sector.
Methods: A literature search identified studies that compared the operation time required by a supervised trainee with a consultant. This time was costed using a business model.
Results: In 22 studies (34 operations), the median operation duration of a supervised trainee was 34% longer than the consultant. To complete a private training list in the same time as a consultant list, one major case would have to be dropped. A consultant's average lost opportunity cost was $1186 per list ($106 698 per year). Training in rooms and administration requirements increased this to $155 618 per year. To train 400 trainees in the private sector to college standards would require 54 000 training lists per year. The consultants' national lost opportunity cost would be $137 million per year. The average lost hospital case payment was $5894 per list, or $330 million per year nationally. The total lost opportunity cost of surgical training in the private sector would be about $467 million per year. When trainee salaries, other specialties and indirect expenses are included, the total cost will be substantially greater.
Conclusion: It is unlikely that surgeons or hospitals will be prepared to absorb these costs. There needs to be a public debate about the funding implications of surgical training in the private sector.

1445-2197/asset/bannerforeground.jpg?v=1&s=32e7f5a1a2b1776c14ada4b0073c281e787c9856)
