SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Dickinson I, Watters D, Graham I, Montgomery P, Collins J. Guide to the assessment of competence and performance in practising surgeons. ANZ J. Surg. 2009; 79: 198204.
  • 2
    Frank JR (ed.). The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 2005.
  • 3
    Thomas WEG. Teaching and assessing surgical competence. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2006; 88: 429432.
  • 4
    Ritchie WP. The measurement of competence. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001; 86: 1115.
  • 5
    Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pelegrini CA. Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy and metrics. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2003; 196: 933937.
  • 6
    Arora S, Sevdalis N, Sulliman I, Kneebone R, Darzi A. What makes a competent surgeon? Experts’ and trainees’ perceptions of the role of a surgeon. Am. J. Surg. 2009; 198: 726732.
  • 7
    Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick R. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad. Med. 1996; 71: 13631365.
  • 8
    Richie W. The measurement of competence. Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001; 86: 1015.
  • 9
    Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br. J. Surg. 1997; 84: 273278.
  • 10
    Larsen C, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen J, Ottesen B. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale. BJOG 2008; 115: 908916.
  • 11
    Cremers SL, Lora AN, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK. Global rating assessment of skills in intraocular surgery (GRASIS). Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 16551660.
  • 12
    Hamstra SJ, Dubrowski A. Effective training and assessment of surgical skills, and the correlates of performance. Surg. Innov. 2005; 12: 7176.
  • 13
    Larson J, Williams R, Ketchum J, Boehler M, Dunnington G. Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 2009; 138: 640649.
  • 14
    Doyle JD, Webber EM, Sidhu RS. A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room. Am. J. Surg. 2007; 193: 551555.
  • 15
    Verner L, Oleynikov D, Holtmann S, Haider H, Zhukov L. Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci robotic surgical system. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2003; 94: 373378.
  • 16
    Jaffer A, Bednarz B, Challacombe B, Sriprasad S. The assessment of surgical competence in the UK. Int. J. Surg. 2009; 7: 1215.
  • 17
    Hanna GB, Drew T, Clinch P, Hunter B, Cuschieri A. Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg. Endosc. 1998; 12: 9971000.
  • 18
    Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A. The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001; 193: 479485.
  • 19
    Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am. J. Surg. 2002; 184: 7073.
  • 20
    Datta VK, Mackay SD, Gillies D et al. Motion analysis in the assessment of surgical skill. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 2001; 4: 515523.
  • 21
    Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR et al. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003; 23: 317322.
  • 22
    Richards C, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Pellegrini C, Sinanan M. Skills evaluation in minimally invasive surgery using force/torque signatures. Surg. Endosc. 2000; 14: 791798.
  • 23
    Mackay S, Datta V, Chang A, Shah R, Kneebone R, Darzi A. Multiple objective measurements of skill (MOMS): a new approach to the assessment of technical ability in surgical trainees. Ann. Surg. 2003; 238: 291300.
  • 24
    Larson JL, Williams RG, Ketchum J, Boehler ML, Dunnington GL. Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 2005; 138: 640647.
  • 25
    Chou B, Bowen CW, Handa VL. Evaluating the competency of gynecology residents in the operating room: validation of a new assessment tool. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 199: 571.e15715.
  • 26
    Beard J, Rowley D, Bussey M, Pitts D. Workplace-based assessment: assessing technical skill throughout the continuum of surgical training. ANZ J. Surg. 2009; 79: 148153.
  • 27
    Kommu SS, Emara AM, James P et al. An objective scoring system for laparoscopic nephrectomy. J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 14971502.
  • 28
    Pandey VA, Wolfe JH, Liapis CD, Bergqvist D, European Board of Vascular Surgery. The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2006; 93: 11321138.
  • 29
    Katz R, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P, de la Taille A, Abbou CC. Skill assessment of urological laparoscopic surgeons: can criterion levels of surgical performance be determined using the pelvic box trainer? Eur. Urol. 2005; 47: 482487.
  • 30
    Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch WA. Testing technical skill via an innovative ‘bench station’ examination. Am. J. Surg. 1997; 173: 226230.
  • 31
    Szalay D, MacRae H, Regehr G, Reznick R. Using operative outcome to assess technical skill. Am. J. Surg. 2000; 180: 234237.
  • 32
    Fried GM. Lessons from the surgical experience with simulators: incorporation into training and utilization in determining competency. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2006; 16: 425434.
  • 33
    Hasson HM. Core competency in laparoendoscopic surgery. J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2006; 10: 1620.
  • 34
    Cosman PH, Hugh TJ, Shearer CJ, Merrett ND, Biankin AV, Cartmill JA. Skills acquired on virtual reality simulators transfer into the operating room in a blinded, randomised controlled trial. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007; 125: 7681.
  • 35
    Howells NR, Gill HS, Carr AJ, Price AJ, Rees JL. Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomised blinded study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2008; 90: 494499.
  • 36
    Seymour NE. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 182188.
  • 37
    Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Milland T, Darzi A. Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room. Ann. Surg. 2008; 247: 372379.
  • 38
    Driscoll PJ, Paisley AM, Paterson-Brown S. Video assessment of basic surgical trainees’ operative skills. Am. J. Surg. 2008; 196: 265272.
  • 39
    Yorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker S, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003; 327: 10321037.
  • 40
    Collins JP, Civil DI, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, Chehade MD. Surgical education and training in Australia and New Zealand. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 21382144.
  • 41
    Seymour NE. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 182188.
  • 42
    Lucas SM, Zelter IS, Bensalah K. Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 25882591.
  • 43
    Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 374381.
  • 44
    Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J. Randomized trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br. J. Surg. 2004; 91: 146150.
  • 45
    Tsang JS, Naughton PA, Leong S, Hill AD, Kelly CJ, Leahy AL. Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon 2008; 6: 214220.
  • 46
    Gofton W, Dubrowski A, Tabloie F, Backstein D. The effect of computer navigation on trainee learning of surgical skills. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007; 89: 28192827.
  • 47
    Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A. Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2009; 96: 10861093.
  • 48
    Castellvi AO, Hollet LA, Minhajuddin A, Hogg DC, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ. Maintaining surgical proficiency after fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training: a 1-year analysis of skill retention for surgery. Surgery 2009; 146: 387393.
  • 49
    Jonas JB, Rabethge S, Bender HJ. Computer-assisted training for pars plana vitrectomy. Acta Opthal Scand. 2003; 81: 600604.
  • 50
    Kassab E, Tun JK, Arora S et al. ‘Blowing up the barriers’ in surgical training: exploring and validating the concept of distributed simulation. Ann. Surg. 2011; 254: 10591065.
  • 51
    Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009; (1): CD006575.
  • 52
    Hogle NJ, Chang L, Strong VE et al. Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: a long road. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 14761482.
  • 53
    Hogle NJ, Widmann WD, Ude AO, Hardy MA, Fowler DL. Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video game? J. Surg. Educ. 2008; 65: 431435.
  • 54
    Moore AK, Grow DR, Bush RW, Seymore NE. Novices outperform experienced laparoscopists on virtual reality simulator. J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2008; 12: 358364.
  • 55
    Heinrichs W, Lukoff B, Youngblood P et al. Criterion-based training with surgical simulators: proficiency of expert surgeons. JSLS 2007; 11: 273302.
  • 56
    Clevin L, Grantcharov TP. Does box model training improve surgical dexterity and economy of movement during virtual reality laparoscopy? A randomised trial. Acta Obstet. Gynaecol. Scand. 2008; 87: 579581.
  • 57
    Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Gauger PG, Minter RM. LapMentor's metrics possess limited construct validity. J. Soc. Med. Simul. 2008; 3: 1625.
  • 58
    Chung R, Ahmed N. The impact of minimally-invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience; analysis of two decades of national data. Ann. Surg. 2010; 251: 215216.
  • 59
    Carson JS, Smith L, Are M et al. National trends in minimally invasive and open operative experience of graduating general surgery residents: implications for surgical skills curricula development? Am. J. Surg. 2011; 202: 720726.
  • 60
    Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg. Endosc. 2004; 18: 485494.
  • 61
    Schreuder HW, van den Berg CB, Hazebroek EJ, Verheijen RH, Schijven MP. Laparoscopic skills training using inexpensive box trainers: which exercises to choose when constructing a validated training course. BJOG 2011; 118: 15761584.
  • 62
    Neary PC, Boyle E, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Keane FB, Gallagher AG. Construct validity of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy: results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 23012309.
  • 63
    Marh MA, Hodge DO. Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training models: attending versus resident surgeon performance. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008; 34: 980985.
  • 64
    Gauger PG, Hauge LS, Andreatta PB et al. Laparoscopic training to proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. Am. J. Surg. 2010; 199: 7280.
  • 65
    Verdaasdonk EG, Dankleman J, Lange JF, Stassen LP. Incorporation of proficiency criteria for basic laparoscopic skills training: how does it work? Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 26092615.
  • 66
    Korndoffer JR, Dunne DB, Sierra R, Stefandis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates into the operating room. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2005; 201: 2329.
  • 67
    Stefandis D, Acker C, Heniford BT. Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training lead to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay. Surg. Innov. 2008; 15: 6973.
  • 68
    Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 12141222.
  • 69
    Sewell C, Morris D, Blevins NH et al.. Providing metrics and performance feedback on a surgical simulator. Comput. Aided Surg. 2008; 13: 6381.
  • 70
    Feifer A, Al-Ammari A, Kovac E, Delisle J, Carrier S, Anidjar M. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 16521656.
  • 71
    Van Sickle KR, Smith B, McCluscky DA, Bagahai M, Smith CD, Gallagher AG. Evaluation of a tensiometre to provide objective feedback in knot-tying performance. Am. Surg. 2005; 71: 1018–o1023.
  • 72
    Bell AK, Saide MB, Johanas JT, Leisk GG, Shwaitzberg SD, Cao CG. Innovative dynamic minimally-invasive training environment (DynaMITE). Surg. Innov. 2007; 14: 217224.
  • 73
    Bell AK, Zhou M, Shwaitzberg SD, Cao CG. Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 23562363.
  • 74
    Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N et al. Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am. J. Surg. 2010; 199: 6065.
  • 75
    Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N et al. Simulated laparoscopic operating-room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 885900.
  • 76
    Makay S, Morgan P, Datta V, Chang A, Darzi A. Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomised controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 2002; 16: 957961.
  • 77
    Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized controlled trail. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244: 400409.
  • 78
    Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R et al. Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? J. Surg. Res. 2004; 122: 150156.
  • 79
    Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A. When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003; 38: 720724.
  • 80
    Velmanhos GC, Toutouzas KG, Sillin LF et al. Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. Am. J. Surg. 2004; 187: 114119.
  • 81
    Verdaasdonk EG, Dankleman J, Lange JF, Stassen LP. Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: a randomized controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 16361642.
  • 82
    Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Monteny LJ, Dankleman J. Validation of a basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic laparoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Surg. Endosc. 2006; 20: 511518.
  • 83
    Zhu FF, Poolton JM, Wilson MR, Hu Y, Maxwell JP, Masters RS. Implicit motor learning promotes neural efficiency during laparoscopy. Surg. Endosc. 2001; 25: 29502955.
  • 84
    Paige JT, Aaron DL, Yang T et al. Implementation of a preoperative briefing protocol improves accuracy of teamwork assessment in the operating room. Am. Surg. 2008; 74: 817823.
  • 85
    Jamshidi R, Lamasters T, Eisenberg D, Duh QY, Curet M. Video self-assessment augments development of videoscopic suturing skill. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009; 209: 622625.
  • 86
    Backstein D, Agnidis Z, Sadhu E, Macrae H. Effectiveness of repeated video feedback in the acquisition of surgical technical skill. Can. J. Surg. 2005; 48: 195200.
  • 87
    Padney VA, Wolfe J, Black SA et al. Self-assessment of technical skill in surgery: the need for expert feedback. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2008; 90: 286290.
  • 88
    Van Sickle KR, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. The effect of escalating feedback on the psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg. Endosc. 2007; 21: 220224.
  • 89
    Hamstra SJ, Dubrowski A. Effective training and assessment of surgical skills, and the correlates of performance. Surg. Innov. 2005; 12: 7176.
  • 90
    Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G. Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann. Surg. 2001; 233: 159166.
  • 91
    Birch DW, Sample C, Gupta R. The impact of a comprehensive course in advanced minimal access surgery on surgeon practice. Can. J. Surg. 2007; 50: 912.
  • 92
    Birch DW, Misra M, Farrokhyar F. The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice. Can. J. Surg. 2007; 50: 256260.
  • 93
    Ahmed K, Jawad M, Dasgupta P, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Khan MS. Assessment and maintenance of competence in urology. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010; 7: 403413.
  • 94
    Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Selection to Surgical Education and Training. [Cited 6 April 2010.] Available from URL: http://www.surgeons.org/media/162056/pol_2011-11-08_selection_to_surgical_education_and_training_v4.pdf
  • 95
    Pandey VA, Wolfe JH, Liapis CD, Bergqvist D, European Board of Vascular Surgery. The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2006; 93: 11321138.
  • 96
    Gallagher AG, Leonard G, Traynor OJ. Role and feasibility of psychomotor and dexterity testing in selection for surgical training. ANZ J. Surg. 2009; 79: 108113.
  • 97
    Cope DH, Fenton-Lee D. Assessment of laparoscopic skills in interns using the MIST Virtual Reality Simulator; a prerequisite for those considering surgical training? ANZ J. Surg. 2008; 78: 291296.
  • 98
    Nomura T, Miyashita M, Shrestha S. Can interview prior to laparoscopic simulator training predict a trainees skills? J. Surg. Educ. 2008; 65: 225229.
  • 99
    Muschuw K, Osie-Agymang T, Weyers P, Danila R. The impact of self-belief on laparoscopic performance of novices and experienced surgeons. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 19111916.
  • 100
    Goldberg AE, Neifeld JP, Wolfe LG, Goldberg SR. Correlation of manual dexterity with USMLE scores and medical student class rank. J. Surg. Res. 2008; 147: 212215.
  • 101
    Gettman MT, Kondraske GV, Traxer O et al. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts operative performance of laparoscopic surgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2003; 197: 489496.
  • 102
    Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Carter FJ. How to select aspirant laparoscopic surgical trainees: establishing concurrent validity comparing Xitact LS500 index performance scores with standardized psychomotor aptitude test battery scores. J. Surg. Res. 2004; 121: 112119.
  • 103
    Alvand A, Auplish S, Gill H, Rees J. Innate arthroscopic skills in medical students and variation in learning curves. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2011; 93: e115.
  • 104
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Sasso LM. Laparoscopic baseline ability assessment by virtual reality. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2005; 15: 1317.
  • 105
    Kundhal PS, Grantcharov TP. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 645649.
  • 106
    McCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA et al. FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill. Surg. Endosc. 2007; 21: 19911995.
  • 107
    Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD. Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet 2002; 359: 230231.
  • 108
    Steele RJ, Walder C, Herbert M. Psychomotor testing and the ability to perform an anastomosis in junior surgical trainees. Br. J. Surg. 1992; 79: 10651067.
  • 109
    Hassan I, Gerdes B, Koller M et al. Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2007; 23: 685689.
  • 110
    Risucci D, Geiss A, Gellman L, Pinard B, Rosser J. Surgeon-specific factors in the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am. J. Surg. 2001; 181: 289293.
  • 111
    Risucci DA. Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. Am. J. Surg. 2002; 184: 291295.
  • 112
    Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Black FW et al. Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training. Surgery 2006; 140: 252262.
  • 113
    Brandt MG, Davies ET. Visual-spatial ability, learning modality and surgical knot tying. Can. J. Surg. 2006; 49: 412416.
  • 114
    Hedman L, Ström P, Andersson P, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Felländer-Tsai L. High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task. Surg. Endosc. 2006; 20: 12751280.
  • 115
    Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ et al. Visual-spatial ability and the objective assessment of technical skills. Can. J. Plast. Surg. 2001; 9: 104107.
  • 116
    Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, Anastakis DJ et al. Visuospatial abilities relevant to learning psychomotor skills in surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002; 43: 47954799.
  • 117
    Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Caminiti MF, Anastakis DJ, Grober ED, Reznick RK. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery 2003; 134: 750757.
  • 118
    Wanzel KR, Anastakis DJ, McAndrews MP et al. Visual-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents. Am. J. Surg. 2007; 193: 507510.
  • 119
    Boom-Saad Z, Langenecker SA, Bieliauskas LA et al. Surgeons outperform normative controls on neuropsychologic tests, but age-related decay of skills persists. Am. J. Surg. 2008; 195: 205209.
  • 120
    McClusky DA 3rd, Ritter EM, Lederman AB, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. Correlation between perceptual, visuo-spatial, and psychomotor aptitude to duration of training required to reach performance goals on the MIST-VR surgical simulator. Am. Surg. 2005; 71: 1320.
  • 121
    Keehner MM, Tendick F, Meng MV et al. Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. Am. J. Surg. 2004; 188: 7175.
  • 122
    Bann S, Khan M, Datta V, Darzi A. Surgical skill is predicted by the ability to detect errors. Am. J. Surg. 2005; 189: 412415.
  • 123
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Park WC, Tebbit CL, Kumari NV, O'Leary PJ. Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills. Surg. Endosc. 2005; 19: 101104.
  • 124
    Madan AK, Harper JL, Frantzides CT, Tichansky DS. Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 16861689.
  • 125
    Boyd T, Jung I, Van Sickle K, Schwesinger W, Michalek J, Bingener J. Music experience influences laparoscopic skills performance. JSLS 2008; 12: 292294.
  • 126
    Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg. Endosc. 2003; 17: 10821085.
  • 127
    Rosser JC Jr, Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L, Gentile DA, Klonsky J, Merrell R. The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch. Surg. 2007; 142: 181186.
  • 128
    Paschold M, Schröder M, Kauff DW et al. Virtual reality laparoscopy: which potential trainee starts with a higher proficiency level? Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2011; 6: 653662.
  • 129
    Van Hove C, Perry KA, Spight DH et al. Predictors of technical skill acquisition among resident trainees in a laparoscopic skills education program. World J. Surg. 2008; 32: 19171921.
  • 130
    Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CB, Smith CD. Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 12941297.
  • 131
    Badurdeen S, Abdul-Samad O, Story G, Wilson C, Down S, Harris A. Nintendo Wii video-gaming ability predicts laparoscopic skill. Surg. Endosc. 2010; 24: 18241828.
  • 132
    Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ, Sidawy AN, Cronenwett JL. Choice of vascular surgery as a specialty: survey of vascular surgery residents, general surgery chief residents, and medical students at hospitals with vascular surgery training programs. J. Vasc. Surg. 2004; 40: 978984.
  • 133
    Berguer R, Hreljac A. The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons. Surg. Endosc. 2004; 18: 508512.
  • 134
    Schueneman AL, Pickleman J, Freeark RJ. Age, gender, lateral dominance, and prediction of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 1985; 98: 506515.
  • 135
    Donnon T, DesCôteaux JG, Violato C. Impact of cognitive imaging and sex differences on the development of laparoscopic suturing skills. Can. J. Surg. 2005; 48: 387393.
  • 136
    Powers TW, Bentrem DJ, Nagle AP, Toyama MT, Murphy SA, Murayama KM. Hand dominance and performance in a laparoscopic skills curriculum. Surg. Endosc. 2005; 19: 673677.
  • 137
    Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 525528.
  • 138
    Harris CJ, Herbert M, Steele RJ. Psychomotor skills of surgical trainees compared with those of different medical specialists. Br. J. Surg. 1994; 81: 382383.