SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Scott IA, Greenberg PB, Poole PJ. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests. Intern Med J 2008; 38: 1209.
  • 2
    Lord SJ, Irwig L, Simes RJ. When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomised trials? Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 8505.
  • 3
    Chow CK, Sheth T. What is the role of invasive versus non-invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of patients suspected to have coronary heart disease? Intern Med J 2011; 41: 513.
  • 4
    Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, Walker S, Cook J, Jia X et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess 2008; 12: iiiiv, ix–143.
  • 5
    Ollendorf DA, Kuba M, Pearson SD. The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 30716.
  • 6
    Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 153140.
  • 7
    Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, Davis JL et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 95470.
  • 8
    Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS et al. American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 2003; 108: 140418.
  • 9
    Winchester DE, Jois P, Kraft SM, Wymer DC, Hill JA. Immediate computed tomography coronary angiography versus delayed outpatient stress testing for detecting coronary artery disease in emergency department patients with chest pain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10
    Maffei E, Seitun S, Martini C, Palumbo A, Tarantini G, Berti E et al. CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Heart 2010; 96: 19739.
  • 11
    Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Neefjes LA, Meijboom WB, Galema TW, van Mieghem CA et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 6309.
  • 12
    Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 123747.
  • 13
    Chow BJW, Freeman MR, Bowen JM, Levin L, Hopkins RB, Provost Y et al. Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study. Field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 10219.
  • 14
    Nissen SE. Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 21457.
  • 15
    Ladenheim ML, Pollock BH, Rozanski A, Berman DS, Staniloff HM, Forrester JS et al. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 46471.
  • 16
    Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Scheffel H et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 2008; 248: 41423.
  • 17
    van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Pundziute G, de Roos A, Schalij MJ et al. Comparison of non-invasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of men with known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 6536.
  • 18
    Sarno G, Decramer I, Vanhoenacker PK, De Bruyne B, Hamilos M, Cuisset T et al. On the inappropriateness of non-invasive multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger off coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 5507.
  • 19
    Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 21324.
  • 20
    Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Ross MA, O'Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomised controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 86371.
  • 21
    Chang SA, Choi SI, Choi EK, Kim HK, Jung JW, Chun EJ et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J 2008; 156: 37583.
  • 22
    Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Jaffe R, Karkabi B, Flugelman MY et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 2007; 115: 17628.
  • 23
    May JM, Schuman WP, Strote JN, Branch KR, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW et al. Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1504.
  • 24
    Burt JR, Iribarren C, Fair JM, Norton LC, Mahbouba M, Rubin GD et al. Atherosclerotic Disease, Vascular Function, and Genetic Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study. Incidental findings on cardiac multidetector row computed tomography among healthy older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 75661.
  • 25
    Wilson SR, Sabatine MS, Braunwald E, Sloan S, Murphy SA, Morrow D. Detection of myocardial injury in patients with unstable angina using a novel nanoparticle cardiac troponin I assay: observations from the PROTECT-TIMI 30 Trial. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 38691.
  • 26
    Imaging Subcommittee of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Current Clinical Applications. Sydney: CSANZ; November 26, 2010; [cited 2011 Apr 15]. Available from URL: http://www.csanz.edu.au/Portals/0/Guidelines/Procedures/Nonivasive%20Coronary%20Artery%20Imaging%20-%20Current%20Clinical%20Applications.pdf
  • 27
    Redberg RF, Walsh J. Pay now, benefits may follow – the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 230911.