Resistance spot weldability and high cycle fatigue behaviour of martensitic (M190) steel sheet
Article first published online: 28 JUN 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01489.x
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Issue

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Volume 34, Issue 1, pages 46–52, January 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
PAL, T. K. and CHATTOPADHYAY, K. (2011), Resistance spot weldability and high cycle fatigue behaviour of martensitic (M190) steel sheet. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 34: 46–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01489.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 28 JUN 2010
- Received in final form 24 March 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- interfacial fracture;
- resistance spot weld;
- stress intensity factor;
- transition in fracture mode
ABSTRACT
Resistance spot welding characteristics of martensitic sheet steel (M190) was investigated using a peel test, microhardness test, tensile shear test and fatigue test. Tensile shear test provides better spot weld quality than conventional peel test and hardness is not a good indicator of the susceptibility to interfacial fracture. Unlike DP 600 steel, the maximum load carrying capability is affected by the mode of fracture. At high load low cycle range, weld parameters have a significant difference in the S–N curves. But, almost similar fatigue behaviour of the spot welds is noted at low load high cycle range. However, when applied load was converted to stress intensity factor, the difference in fatigue behaviour between welds and even DP 780 steel diminished. Furthermore, a transition in fracture mode, that is, interfacial and plug and hole type at about 50% of yield load were observed. [* Note: Correction made on 16 Aug 2010 after first publication online on 28 June 2010. The authors' affiliations were corrected. Under Results and Discussion, in reference to the HAZ hazardness in the ‘Micro hardness profile’ section, Figure 2 was changed to Figure 3. In reference to the welding parameters under ‘Tensile properties’ section, note that Figure 4 represents 7/200 and Figure 5 represents 5/300. In reference to the low cycles behaviour of S-N curves in the ‘Fatigue’ section, Figure 5 was changed to Figure 6.]

1460-2695/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=c87703d9db962189a900f41ea52052248f8b5108)